-->
Search the ArchivesNavigationContact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
Taxes and local officials: Where are the adults?On the issues facing Fayette: Where are the adults? What should we think of local officials whose response to declining tax revenues is to seek higher tax rates? Why would they do that, instead of automatically seeking to cut nonessential services and nonessential personnel to match their out-go with their income, the way the rest of us do? The question has more than one simple answer. First, to most local elected officials and almost all government employees, there is no such thing as nonessential services and personnel. I beg to differ. My definitions of essential local government services are public safety (police, fire, EMS and emergency communications), basic public health, maintenance of roads and bridges, water, sewer and trash pickup services. That’s it. I will gladly pay taxes or fees for efficient delivery of those essential services. Everything else is nonessential, nice-to-have, optional stuff. When we can afford those nonessentials, let’s pay for them. When we can no longer afford those nice-to-have services, let’s cut them until we can afford them again. Do not raise my taxes to pay for running a swim center and a dozen sports fields. If I can no longer afford to pay for premium cable with all the channels, then I cut back to expanded basic ... or basic ... or cancel my cable service. I can live without it. The Fayette County School System should chop central office workers, the part of the system least touched (and least essential) by budget cutbacks. The Fayette County Commission should postpone or cancel the multimillion-dollar parkway to nowhere. It’s unneeded now and into the foreseeable future. A bad idea doesn’t get better just because public officials stubbornly dig in their heels. The Peachtree City Council should act like responsible adults and slice off some expensive slabs of beef from the hindquarters of the city’s most sacred cow: Recreation. And therein lies another part of the not-so-simple answer: Spoiled consumers of “free” government services. Drag a few promised new sports fields in front of at least one councilwoman and a relatively few diehard supporters, and they will be willing to accommodate whatever other traffic and density poisons a clever developer wants to inflict on the rest of us. It ain’t worth it, folks. It’s bribery by amenity, and we can no longer afford its toxic side effects. Children demand things their parents cannot afford. Tough love requires that a parent must say no to unrealistic demands. Let’s cut nonessential local government services, projects and people so that current tax income equals spending on essential services, projects and people. When good times return — and they always have in the past — add back in the nice-to-have services as current income allows. Do NOT increase our taxes. [The above is a column of opinion by the publisher and editor of The Citizen.] login to post comments | Cal Beverly's blog |