Chairman descends mountain, speaks to us

Cal Beverly's picture

“All government, of right, originates with the people, is founded upon their will only, and is instituted solely for the good of the whole. Public officers are the trustees and servants of the people and are at all times amenable to them.” — (Constitution of Georgia of 1983, Article I, Section II, Paragraph I.)

“I have held firm the belief that your vote for me reflected your trust in my ability to serve as your representative and to make sound and informed decisions on your behalf; and this I have and will continue to do.” — Jack Smith, chairman, Fayette County Board of Commissioners, “An open letter to the citizens of Fayette County,” July 8, 2008. (Reprinted here.)

Well, see, Jack, there’s this slight problem with your point of view: You work for us. And we didn’t give you a four-year mandate to ignore us, the lowly taxpayers.

And while not all of us voted for you, I suspect that not even one of us elected you to be a sovereign ruler, oblivious to the political and economic concerns of your constituents. You were elected, not crowned.

That’s why we are raising some objections to your politically tone-deaf push toward sweeter county pensions and higher county employee pay in the teeth of a recession and falling tax revenues.

Do you really believe — as you seem to indicate in your “open letter to the citizens of Fayette County” — that you can govern in a vacuum, just you and the county workers?

Are the recipients of your largesse — our money — the only constituents you are concerned about?

Don’t you get it that it’s not about the sizes of individual raises or larger pensions, but it is ALL about you giving ANY raises and sweetening ANY pensions with OUR money in such perilous economic times?

I know you ran as a putative Republican, Jack, but good grief, the local Democrats are singing your praises.

“I only wish they would wake up to the fact that [commissioners Smith, Frady, Horgan and Maxwell] make decisions more like 21st century Democrats than the current leaders of the party whose name they run under. These guys don’t act like Free Market Friedmaniacs. I for one would welcome them all back to the Party of the People,” says an email to county Democrats from a high county Democratic official, who goes on to urge a vote for Republican incumbents Horgan and Frady.

We taxpayers are hurting, Jack, and you blithely look down your patrician nose and instruct us to eat your “truth” and stuff our objections.

May I respectfully remind you: You are NOT the county CEO, pressing relentlessly toward a work force without turnover, regardless of the wishes of your constituents.

Your lack of regard for political appearances and economic timing is not brave; it’s just arrogant — rooted, I suppose, in your statement above that you consider yourself beyond political considerations until the next time you come up for election.

I’m writing this Monday, well before Tuesday night’s election results, so I don’t know who will be gloating Wednesday morning.

Despite that, I have some unasked-for information for you.

You accuse others of “self-serving, vicious attacks” on you and — I presume — three other commissioners. Then you launch into some attacks of your own with your definition of golden parachutes, questionable political contributions and turnover in management.

And how do you characterize those who question your political judgment? “Those ... are nothing more than political fear-mongers making a feeble attempt to regain their lost power and influence by using distortions of facts, innuendoes and rhetoric to create a false sense of insecurity in those they prey upon.”

“Prey upon.” Wow. Like predatory animals. Ummmm, Jack, could that be considered a “vicious attack”?

No, of course not; after all, by your own assertions, you represent the “truth,” the right way and the pure light, don’t you?

And your assessment of your actions so far? “I am confident we have exercised our responsibilities with due diligence, ensuring a conservative fiscal philosophy on spending your tax dollars and a priority on open government.”

Jack, really now. That’s not a bit self-serving of you, is it?

Which is more important, Jack: Sweetening county pensions and raising county pay? Or identifying with the lowly taxpayers and reasoning, “This is not the best time to implement pay raises and pension sweeteners while taxpayers are getting pounded. This can wait until better economic times.”

Let me ask you, Jack: Do we taxpayers get any say in this? What if we disagree that your decisions are fiscally prudent at a time of national financial crisis? Is it OK for you to ignore criticism from your constituents the day after you get elected and not expect any disagreement until your four years are up?

I guess it’s like that old joke about a woman asking her husband why, after 40 years, he never tells her he loves her anymore. “I told you I loved you when I married you 40 years ago; if there’s any change, I’ll notify you.”

Except, Jack, your position seems to be this: “You are lucky to have me, and I’m going to do what I believe is best for you for the next two-and-a-half years, whether you like it or not, and shut up until then.”

Gosh, Jack, I really do believe that you come under that category mentioned in the Georgia Constitution above: “Public officers are the trustees and servants of the people and are at all times amenable to them.”

Here’s the other thing, Jack: I wonder if you really buy that “servant” stuff. And I know you don’t get that part about your being “at all times amenable to them.”

Could it be that you believe you did us all a great favor by lowering yourself to run for public office, and if we don’t like what you are doing, it’s just because we are ungrateful wretches who just need the “truth” explained to us?

Your “truth,” that is. Who was that guy who asked, rhetorically, “What is truth?”?

Sorry, Jack: I just don’t buy that you are the sole possessor or dispenser of that precious commodity. In fact, I firmly believe you might be just as potentially wrong as the rest of us might be.

The difference is this: We pay for your mistakes, and we pay for your successes. Either way, we pay.

Being the polite Southern boy that I am, I would never say that you are just another high-handed, thin-skinned, politically unskilled good ol’ boy who believes he ought to be exempt from continuous public accountability.

Other than that, it was nice to finally hear from you in your open letter to Fayette County citizens. You ought to do that more often. Now, do they get to talk back to you?

Let’s keep in touch. We’ll be around.

Oh, and I recommend to you and your fellow board members a continual close reading of the Georgia Constitution, particularly Article I, section II, Paragraph I. I’m told on good authority that it’s a humbling thing to actually BE a servant.

login to post comments | Cal Beverly's blog

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by PTC Observer on Mon, 08/11/2008 - 8:23pm.

For you last editorial - it's time that our elected representatives understand that it is they that work for us, not the other way around. An entitlement mentality has no place in public service. - Observer

Ruth Kimble's picture
Submitted by Ruth Kimble on Wed, 07/23/2008 - 10:48am.

How dare you win an election. How dare you have an opinion of your own that is guided by a moral compass and values. How dare you not submit a weekly editorial to the Citizen. Didn’t you know it is a requirement of all elected Fayette County officials. Look to the example of Steve Brown and Peter Pfeifer. Don’t you know that Cal Beverly is the self-crowned King of Fayette County??? You were only elected by the people. You must pay homage to Cal Almighty or suffer the consequences. Because we know that Cal Beverly never engages in vicious personal attacks. Cal always backs up his venomous comments with facts and statistics (except for this one – guess it’s just the exception that proves the rule!)
Dear Jack,
I don’t even know you, but keep up the good work. If you’ve got Cal Beverly all worked up into a lather, you must be doing something right.
Do what the rest of us in Fayette County do. Just ignore Cal Beverly. And be thankful he doesn’t support you. Everyone knows when Cal comes out strongly in favor of a candidate (Steve Brown, for example) it is the kiss of death.
As for being a “servant”, thank you. Jack. Thank you for serving. You know the definition of servitude. By comparison, Cal is guilty of self-servitude. As for this being Cal’s “shining hour”? OMG, you’ve got to be kidding.

Ruth Kimble, Fayette County citizen

P.S. Polite Southern Boy???? Really now Cal! That one takes the cake. The only “truth” Cal has uncovered here is a huge demonstration of his own habit of engaging in vicious personal attacks. A more accurate title for Cal’s editorial would be: Editor rises from pit, launches vicious personal attack.


Submitted by PTC Observer on Mon, 08/11/2008 - 8:31pm.

Madam, or just a county employee?

veni_vedi_vici_fayette's picture
Submitted by veni_vedi_vici_... on Wed, 07/16/2008 - 9:32pm.

Mr. Beverly, You hit the nail on the head with this editorial. Mr. Smith is the most arrogant, condesending chairman we have ever had. It you thought Dunn was arrogant, he looks like a shrinking violet next the the current chairman. Some of my neighbors and I went to the commission a while ago regarding the west bypass. One of the gentlemen got up to speak politely and Jack Smith motioned for one of the Marshals to get in his face. It looked like the KGB. Smith cannot stand anyone to question HIM. He knows all.


maximus's picture
Submitted by maximus on Wed, 07/16/2008 - 5:44pm.

In your article I didn't see where you addressed the validity of any of Jack's claims on the budget:

“The county will not increase taxes this year, unlike many other jurisdictions; yet at the same time we will be able to maintain current service levels and have reduced the Fiscal Year 2009 budget by over 6 percent, representing a reduction in spending of approximately $4,800,000 – after implementation of salary increases.

Beginning last year in anticipation of reduced revenues, the Board of Commissioners directed the county manager to freeze all vacancies that were not critical in providing services. Currently there are 23 positions that have not been filled, representing a cash savings of approximately $1,200,000.

We hired in-house legal counsel, and that alone has saved $400,000 in legal expense during its first year.

We bid out insurance contracts rather than using a previously used intermediary, resulting in savings of approximately $900,000.

We invested in sorely needed technology improvements, saving in excess of $100,000 in personnel costs.”

How about some substance, Cal, instead of some say-nothing long winded rant?

Maximus


Submitted by PTC Observer on Mon, 08/11/2008 - 8:40pm.

Gluteus Maximus?

No one with half a brain buys the stuff you guys are putting out. Saving? How about cutting the size of government in half, now that's a cost savings we all can live with, and maybe just maybe the government would still be able to function. And function well.

I think it's pretty apparent that the taxpayers are doing with less and less. So, exactly why is it that the government can't?

Now go back to work.

Submitted by abaldwin on Wed, 07/16/2008 - 4:29pm.

Pension cost cannot go down with a defined benefit system over the long term. Do you understand that a defined benefit system guarantees an employee a benefit regardless of the return on investment?? Why do you think that corporations are fleeing defined benefit plans?? I guarantee it is not because they think they are less expensive. A defined contribution plan is the only fair way to reward employee service - fair to the employee and fair to the taxpayer.

Sadly, I don't think this election represents a well informed citizenry.

Submitted by swhusky on Wed, 07/16/2008 - 4:13pm.

Looks like the majority didn't agree with your attempts to change the election the way you wanted it!

Submitted by yada yada yada on Wed, 07/16/2008 - 1:17pm.

Cal, this was beautifully written. Perfect in every aspect. I could not agree more. Keep up the good work. Yes, the Democrat former Chair endorsed Smith, Horgan, Frady and Maxwell and asked all Democrats to vote for them. It seems it worked, too. The dems also voted for Ann Jackson,(who is one of them),since they had nobody to vote for on the local level in their party. What a shame.

Paul Perkins's picture
Submitted by Paul Perkins on Wed, 07/16/2008 - 8:54am.

I don’t agree with every action that Smith and the commissioners have taken, but the goal of Fayette County government is simple. Provide the needed services at the most efficient cost.

How does a “polite Southern boy” label someone a big spender when the pension cost will go DOWN over 500,000 per year under the proposed retirement plan?? Two independent actuarial studies have confirmed that there is less than a 5% possibility of the funding requirement ever even equaling (much less exceeding) the pre-2008 levels that the current plan requires.

I mentioned the concept of “the most efficient cost” above. When the county was running up to 30% employee turnover in EMS and 19% countywide, it wouldn't matter if you are paying minimum wage to everyone, you are running a more expensive and less efficient operation.

It takes about 5 years of training for an EMT to be able to work without supervision. The surrounding counties estimate training costs of over 30,000 plus over this time period. Employee turnover is down from the Dunn/Wells/Peter induced rate of 19% to about 3%-4%.

So I ask- which group of commissioners are the real wasteful spenders?

BTW-Maybe if emails from the commissioner’s office to the Citizen didn’t bounce back (giving the distinct appearance that they were deliberately blocked) there could be more of the “keeping in touch” you mentioned.


sniffles5's picture
Submitted by sniffles5 on Wed, 07/16/2008 - 9:25am.

Howdy Paul!

I'll admit I came late to the game regarding this "defined benefit"/"defined contribution" dustup.

I'm interested in reading those actuarial studies about the $500,000 savings, have you got a link?

I find it strange that our Republican commission has adopted "defined benefit" as their vehicle, as it is one of the Holy Grail "wants" of the national public employees union (ASFCME). My understanding is that decisions were made at "Wednesday working meetings" where public comment was not allowed.

I'm a little confused by all this and want to educate myself.


Paul Perkins's picture
Submitted by Paul Perkins on Wed, 07/16/2008 - 4:30pm.

Just saw your post as I was printing the boarding pass for a trip that will take me out of town for a few days.

There's no link on the county site yet, but I will go by Stonewall and get a copy when I get back in town next week.

If you don't want to wait, drop by the commissioners office and ask Floyd at the check-in desk for a copy.

Nuk-You are correct in the assumption that these plans can, in some cases, be expensive. What makes this one work is that the employees are willing to give up some of their current matching contributions and apply them to the new plan.

Also they only accrue 1.5% of compensation per year over a 30 year max. In other words starting at the date of implementation over the next 30 years of service you could earn 45% of compensation at retirement (1.5x30).

There would be immediate vesting meaning that a current employee with 5 years of service would accrue the right to 1.5% of compensation in the first year that the plan starts.

I realize that may be as clear as mud, but after you read it a few times it begins to make sense.


Submitted by Fayette Publius on Wed, 07/16/2008 - 9:34pm.

Hope you have a nice trip, Jack, I mean, "Paul". I'm sure Eric, (maximus) will be able to hold down the fort here with all the slick talking points you guys have come up with in one of your secret meetings.

NUK_1's picture
Submitted by NUK_1 on Wed, 07/16/2008 - 10:34am.

It's extremely hard to imagine how any commissioner would be against saving 500K, especially since defined benefit plans are almost always more expensive and benefits the employees more long-term by far, and here the County would be getting off cheaper! Way more benefit to the employee and a 500K savings...let's see that proof.


Submitted by BOLO on Tue, 07/15/2008 - 10:55pm.

In the WORST economy in over 30 years, this Board has seen fit to play the Big Giveaway with our tax dollars. And no matter what they claim to have done as "due dilligence", they have no way to guarantee that (even in the absence of a change in their formula) this will not result in an unfunded liability, period. To call them irresponsible is overly kind.

Please don't take your eye off this bunch. They're going to sell this county down the river and head for the hills with the spoils. But, of course, it will be for our own good.

Submitted by allin on Tue, 07/15/2008 - 4:58pm.

Mr. Beverly for conveying many of the taxpayers feelings and thoughts concerning the current board and chairman. I'm very concern with the define pension plan and the price tag that the taxpayers will have to deal with years down the line. I Have yet to see the quessamate? Or does anyone really know the long term costs for the taxpayers ?

I believe the current county matching 401K funds that are provided to the county employees is quite generous, this type of program allows for flexibility if the county employee decides to move on to another career or opportunity outside the county. The 401K can be rolled or moved while a define pension plan would be less flexible and also generates an attitude of entitlement.

I'm hoping the county board will not sell the taxpayers out to keep their commitment to the county employees for getting them elected in the first place.

sniffles5's picture
Submitted by sniffles5 on Tue, 07/15/2008 - 4:08pm.

Well said, sir. Well said.

These past two weeks' editorials have been your shining hour.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.