-->
Search the ArchivesNavigationContact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
Spending Cuts, Now Really....I wondered just how long and how desperate our political leaders would have to be to use the term 'spending cuts'. I guess it took a truck driving former male model declaring that the seat he was seeking actually belonged to the people of his state and not to any one individual or political party. Our President must do this for political capital, certainly not that what he's asking for will stem the tide of red ink. Pundits point to a $15 billion dollar savings this year and perhaps as much as $250 billion over ten years should our esteemed Congress approve the measure. The problem is that when compared to the annual deficit, this amount equates to far less than one percent of the annual expenditures. It’s kind of like urinating in the ocean in hopes to make it yellow. But there are those Kool-Aid drinkers out there who actually believe this reduction will work. These are the same folks who if our President said that his administration governs in the open would still believe in spite of proof to the contrary. Just for fun, let’s get serious and propose a few reductions that just might help: 1-Disband the Congressional Flight Detachment and ground then sell all its assets. Should Congress need to fly on a junket, have an aide purchase a ticket. 2-Eliminate within 48 hours ninety percent of the Federal Department of Education for everything they do is duplicated at the state level. 3-By Executive Order ban all foreign aid for a period of twelve months, maintaining an option for another twelve. 4-Cut all federal departments and agencies by fifteen percent immediately, and cut another ten percent within the next twelve months. 5-Stop the War on Drugs and just surrender. These are but five cost saving measures that have a chance of being effective, if implemented. I’m sure many more exist. Mike King's blog | login to post comments |