US Naval Security Threatened by Racism

The Reverse Racist Policies of the Naval Academy is creating less qualified graduates to command and run highly sophisticated military technology. More qualified students are not allowed to enter Annapolis.
The admissions policy is based on diversity, not ability. White applicants must have all A’s & B’s and SAT Scores above 600 on English & Math, and only one of every 10 of those will be selected. But Minorities need only SAT’s in the mid 500’s and grade of C’s for automatic admission.
Minorities with SAT’s in the 300’s and grades of D are also admitted after a year of taxpayer – supported remedial school. This is systematic discrimination and a National disgrace of racism. Not taking the best qualified will result in naval mistakes in operating defense equipment in time of war and end in defeat of our Navy. Fully 35% of Naval grads now fall into the 300-500 SAT Scores with grades of D & C, with an immediate goal of 42%.
You can bet your bottom dollar, China, Korea, Russia, Iran & other enemies will have their best technicians as Soldiers & Sailors. When a Nation can’t protect its borders and citizens it is doomed to the ash pile of antiquity, like the Roman Empire.

The Shadow's blog | login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Mon, 07/13/2009 - 3:06pm.

Please cite your source(s).
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


Submitted by Bonkers on Mon, 07/13/2009 - 6:55pm.

During the Korean War the Navy had maybe a dozen black sailors, don't know where they kept them.
The ships had Filipinos on them who did all of the cooking and serving for the officers.

It is better now.

Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Mon, 07/13/2009 - 7:04pm.

Truman did the right thing with Executive Order 9981. But it took time for it to happen. I find it so despicable that black veterans (and blacks in general) were treated the way they were. Shameful.
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Mon, 07/13/2009 - 3:42pm.

The Shaddow's Stroy Link

snappynappy's Story Link

Same story for both.
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Tue, 07/14/2009 - 6:43am.

And a lawsuit? Without a doubt headed to the Supreme Court where our brightest and best will defend the Constitution without any regard to race quotas or personal agendas.

Wonder how the so-called mainstream press will report on a story like that?


The Wedge's picture
Submitted by The Wedge on Mon, 07/13/2009 - 3:44pm.

Each service academy slices and dices their admission data for Congress and the GAO/IG. It may be getting worse since I last looked at the data in the late 80's


Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Mon, 07/13/2009 - 3:46pm.

Government jobs have preferences.
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


Submitted by AtHomeGym on Mon, 07/13/2009 - 4:08pm.

Cy, maybe things have changed since I retired 8 yrs ago, but I was a Govt Supervisor who did hiring and never had any such preferences imposed on my hiring selections.

Submitted by Bonkers on Mon, 07/13/2009 - 6:31pm.

Did you get to see and review ALL applicants or from a list given to you?

Submitted by AtHomeGym on Mon, 07/13/2009 - 7:11pm.

We didn't do individual interviews but I did get all the original applications along with the list prepared by personnel officials.

Submitted by Bonkers on Tue, 07/14/2009 - 6:40am.

What you enumerate about Personnel (HR) determining who you can hire is one of the things wrong today.
In fact, if I understand, you don't get to interview anyone personally.

When it is determined that a supervisor is incapable of hiring his help and that must be done by experts (HR) then supervisors are emasculated, so to speak.

Supervisors used to be trained just how to interview and hire-- along with many years of experience in the field.

Personnel (HR) was the support for supervision, not the dictator. They only looked for or sorted out exactly what you told them to do.

Of course, I realize that the civil service and the military do have special circumstances, but after all they are somewhat "Special!"
One can't blame "laws" for supervisors not being authorized to hire who he wants.
If he selects someone who can't be hired due to "laws" then HR can advise the reason.
I can understand nowadays why HR should be consulted before making the offer yourself.
The details of the hiring letter should be done by HR at your instructions.
I'm sorry but that is the way to make progress. We proved that in the 40s, 50s. 60s, and 70s.
Then we made recent grads and bean-counters supervisors!!!

Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Mon, 07/13/2009 - 4:26pm.

Don't know about your area but I do know that the Friendly Aviation Association will "re-calibrate" its potential candidate list based on what OKC directs. Criteria can range from experience, education, veteran status and other things...... The hiring manager works off of this list.
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


Submitted by AtHomeGym on Mon, 07/13/2009 - 4:36pm.

I would write the Job Descripton and develop required Knowledges, Skills, & Abilities. The personnel office would advertise, screen applications against the JD and KSAs and eventually send me a list of those considered qualified. I then chose from that list. Now there were certain special cases, for example employees returning from overseas without a job got some priority but I never got pressured to select by race or to consider "diversity". I was primarily interested in "Best Qualified" and that's what mostly drove my selections.

Submitted by Bonkers on Tue, 07/14/2009 - 1:30pm.

Are you avoiding saying that HR might have selected according to prejudices? Before you got the list.

Submitted by AtHomeGym on Tue, 07/14/2009 - 3:54pm.

There's no way to tell how HR did their evaluation but regardless, it was not mandatory for me to select from their ranked list. Truth be known, I could have reviewed all the apps and made a selection without HR involvement, absent regulations said they had certain responsibilities. So regardless of what HR did, I still had the final word on selection. And because our jobs were so technical, HR had few personnnel with the skills to do accurate evals of the apps anyway. In their case, it was mostly a "word game" match between the JD, KSAs and the Application. I did the true technical eval and added the common sense factor prior to making a selection.Never had a complaint filed.

Submitted by The Shadow on Mon, 07/13/2009 - 3:27pm.

humanevents.com/article.php?id=32595
drudgereport.com (Pat Buchanan, Dumbing Down the US Navy)

snappynappy's picture
Submitted by snappynappy on Mon, 07/13/2009 - 3:25pm.

http://www.niagarafallsreporter.com/buchanan7.14.09.html you can copy paste to this article.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.