Bobby and PTC deserve Calulla Hills and worse, and it is coming. BOHICA. You are the same people that demonized Steve Brown. Steve Brown is the only Mayor that PTC EVER had that was not co-opted by Black, Mitchell and the Development Crowd. Fred Brown even had the audacity to leave the Mayor's office and be a lobbyist for the Developers. Now the very disaster that Steve Brown fought (overloading us with residential on our already underfunded, overcrowded schools) is happening. And all of this at a time when there is a glut of houses for sale, sales tax revenue going down, property taxes going up, road budgets escalating. And it will only get worse. I agree with Don Haddix--- the city attorney never said that there wouldn't be a precedent. For Logsdon, being Mayor has been one very profitable pub crawl and all of you people that put him in office are to blame. And that includes Spear Road Guy and those tired old Republican wine-and-cheesers who also put Horgan in for fear of electing a black guy. Back to PTC ---think about it-- what did Brown do wrong? He was abrasive, contentious, yes, but he never ever even touched the land use plan. You hypocrites hammered him because he supported the Lutheran Church rezoning as excuse to get him out all while the Church sits on a State Highway on the opposite corner of a strip shopping center and across from a bar and grill. You people deserve the hell hole in Fayette you are getting.

If you think PTC is a "hell hole" then I would hate to see where you live. I've lived all over Atlanta, and in my humble opinion, not much comes close to being as nice overall at my little City.

First of all, I agree that the re-zoning should not take place, especially given the close proximity to the airport. But if you want a park to be built, who is going to pay for it? Are you saying Pathways should donate the land and pay for a park just because they are developers? Would you donate your house to the city for the purpose of building a park? Of course you wouldn't. Why would Pathways decide any differently? Should the city take the land by eminent domain? Well, if the city tries that, they better check with the lawyers first. And even if it was legal, the city would still have to compensate Pathways fair market value for taking the land. And if there was a dispute over fair market value you can be sure it would involve a long expensive court battle. Then the city would still have to pay to develop the park.

The Pathways scum is really pushing too far this time. I promise signs, pickets and a flyover airplane with banner when they try to open this abortion of a development.

Yes Steve you are right it will be a 3-2 vote to approve, but at least it will make the November elections more interesting. At least we will have a real issue this time.

I too will be out of town, but hubby wil be there with bells on. It is a good look for him, but do not touch him ladies - he's mine.

I see this development as fantastic place to locate Section 8 Housing residents. Who else in there right mind would want to dwell there? Is there anything 'The Three' will stand up to or stand for besides the developers? What are these characters thinking?

Are You Freer Today Than You Were Before Obama?