House Bill Aims to Strip Nearly All Americans of Second Amendment Right

DarthDubious's picture

A sinister bill working its way through the House may eventually serve as a companion piece to the Department of Homeland Security’s “Rightwing Extremist” report that labels veterans and advocates of the Second Amendment as dangerous terrorists — H.R. 2159, The Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act of 2009, sponsored by Rep. Peter King of New York.

The bill would “increase public safety by permitting the Attorney General to deny the transfer of a firearm or the issuance of firearms or explosives licenses to a known or suspected dangerous terrorist.”

On April 29, with little fanfare or corporate media coverage, H.R. 2159 was introduced and referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. The bill would “increase public safety by permitting the Attorney General to deny the transfer of a firearm or the issuance of firearms or explosives licenses to a known or suspected dangerous terrorist.” The entire bill can be read on the Govtrack website.

A similar bill was introduced in the Senate in 2007 but did not make it out of committee.

As noted above, the DHS has compiled a long list of folks the government considers terrorists. The bill, if enacted, would allow the attorney general, a documented gun-grabber, to deny millions of Americans due process. “[Rep. King] would deny citizens their civil liberties based on no due process,” Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America, tells WorldNetDaily.

Pratt worries that the new bill will be used in conjunction with the DHS “Rightwing Extremism” report. “By those standards, I’m one of [DHS Secretary] Janet Napolitano’s terrorists,” Pratt continues. “This bill would enable the attorney general to put all of the people who voted against Obama on no-gun lists, because according to the DHS, they’re all potential terrorists. Actually, we could rename this bill the Janet Napolitano Frenzied Fantasy Implementation Act of 2009.”

On May 1, 2009, Infowars reported on the existence of another DHS document, the “Domestic Extremism Lexicon.” It adds more suspected terrorists to the government’s list, including people working in the alternative media, anarchists, pro-life activists, skinheads, lone terrorists, members of the militia movement, “decentralized” terrorists, and others.

The DHS reports were distributed to “federal, state, local, and tribal counterterrorism and law enforcement officials so they may effectively deter, prevent, preempt, or respond to terrorist attacks against the United States.”

Earlier this week, a man was stopped in Louisiana and detained by police for the crime of displaying a “Don’t tread one me” bumper sticker on his car. A background check was conducted to determine whether he was a member of an “extremist” group, according to The American Vision website. “Don’t tread on me” was originally displayed on a flag designed by general and statesman Christopher Gadsden during the Revolutionary War. It is depicted as a terrorist symbol in the DHS “Rightwing Extremist” report.

Stephen Halbrook, Independent Institute Research Fellow and author of the book The Founders’ Second Amendment, testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee in opposition to Attorney General nominee Eric Holder.

During Holder’s shoo-in confirmation hearings earlier this year, Stephen Halbrook, Second Amendment attorney, detailed Holder’s vehement opposition to the right to bear arms. Holder’s role in the Waco massacre and Ruby Ridge were expected to be brought up during the hearings but were not.

Shortly after 9/11, Holder penned a Washington Post op-ed entitled “Keeping Guns Away From Terrorists.” In the article, the future Attorney General argues that a new law should give “the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms a record of every firearm sale.” He also states that prospective gun buyers should be checked against the secret “watch lists” compiled by various government entities. In order to make his point, Holder makes the ludicrous hypothesis that Osama bin Laden would be able to purchase an unregistered firearm at a gun show in America.

The government now possesses the appropriate “watch lists” and has designated specific categories of Americans as domestic terrorists. If H.R. 2159 becomes law the Obama administration and the Justice Department will go after opponents to their far-reaching plan to disarm the nation and deliver it defenseless into the clutches of bankers and corporatists determined to reduce a once proud constitutional republic to the status of a feudalist backwater.

DarthDubious's blog | login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by jekaborman2 on Sun, 05/17/2009 - 6:44pm.

deleted

Submitted by AtHomeGym on Sun, 05/10/2009 - 4:32pm.

DD, this is a Chicken Little post--there is no evidence about determination of who will be considered a 'known or suspected terrorist'. If you have some concrete info, pls tell us.

DarthDubious's picture
Submitted by DarthDubious on Mon, 05/11/2009 - 11:25am.

it is whoever the Attorney Gen deems a "known or suspected terrorist." This is an infringment on the 2nd amendment so it should be fought against, period!

Go read the DHS documents, and then you can argue.

In Liberty,

DarthDubious


Submitted by AtHomeGym on Tue, 05/12/2009 - 7:56am.

DD, I actually read the legislation. One will have to be involved in some activity that is deemed terroristic or of support to terrorists and the determination made that the gun will be most likely used in terrorist activities for the denial of purchase. And then there is an appeal process where the Govt will have to show evidence of the above. I just can't see the USAG inventing that sort of stuff only to be embarrassed in court. I don't believe most citizens will have any reason to worry if the legislation passes--I know I won't. BTW, did YOU read the legislation? If yes, what is your interpretation? Did I get it wrong?

DarthDubious's picture
Submitted by DarthDubious on Tue, 05/12/2009 - 4:05pm.

DHS Docs

DHS Lexicon

In Liberty,

DarthDubious


Submitted by AtHomeGym on Tue, 05/12/2009 - 5:24pm.

What, specifically,ties the DHS Docs to the Legislation? I think the DHS Docs were released prior to total coord or validation. I believe the USAG would be hesitant and reluctant to use any of that erroneous DHS info to deny a citizen the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms.

Submitted by thorvaldr on Tue, 05/12/2009 - 3:05pm.

No, one does not have to be involved in any activity. One need only be "appropriately suspected". Then the involved person has to file an appeal and wade through a bunch of redacted documents in order to get his civil rights back. That's not the way due process is supposed to work. And yes, give Eric Holders views on civilian gun ownership, I can definitely see him doing something like this.

Submitted by AtHomeGym on Tue, 05/12/2009 - 8:01am.

Plus, Rep Pete King (R), who sponsored the legislation, is certainly no libereal wimp. He has a reputation as a well-informed independent-minded guy who will take on major power in either party. Check him out.

Submitted by thorvaldr on Tue, 05/12/2009 - 2:58pm.

I don't remember anyone saying he's a "liberal wimp". Based on this legislation, he appears to be a despotic tyrant bent on subjugating anyone who disagrees with the government in the name of safety.

Submitted by AtHomeGym on Tue, 05/12/2009 - 3:31pm.

I think you are confusing "disagreeing with the govt" and "conducting activities or being involved in activities that are terroristic or are in support of terroristic actions leading to a reasonable, substantiated assumption that the gun would be used in terroristic activities. Besides, I always thought that "Security of our nation" was one of the true functions of govt. But yes, we individuals can participate by not doing stupid things so as to bring suspicion upon ourselves or others. I bet the legislation passes.

DarthDubious's picture
Submitted by DarthDubious on Tue, 05/12/2009 - 3:52pm.

and just like sniffles yours will be one of the first bodies into the ovens. VETERANS are on their lists!!! You best fight this legislation or you will be unable to defend your freedom from the coming fascist control grid that is tightening around you.

The bankers have taken over our country and you are to blind to see it. Call for their arrest!!! This is the only solution to what is happening. They are criminals. They have stolen $14.8 TRILLION since last October. We now must pay with interest for our own slavery, and no one is being helped with their mortgage. You know $9.5 trillion would have paid off ALL mortgage debt in the entire country. But no it goes to the criminal bankers who still keep liquidity from the public.

In Liberty,

DarthDubious


Submitted by AtHomeGym on Tue, 05/12/2009 - 4:30pm.

DD, I don't mind getting involved in doing the right thing but I like to have some belief that I can actually have some influence and not just spin my wheels and spout off because it makes me feel better. The banking industry is beyond my reach. I write my elected representatives and tell them what I think. Just for your info, I never have and never will "lick anyone's boots--wouldn't know where to start. BTW, what's a mortgage?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.