Having a bit of a background in spiritual matters, including philosophy, I'd have to say that Creationism should NOT be taught in our schools, unless and of course, if my Brain should think that it should.

Descartes once opined "I think, therefore I am." Sounds an awful like, "I am that I am," from Moses' dialogue with the burning Bush.

So, for me, whether its Jesus Christ or the Spaghetti Monster, it doesn't really matter, because none of this is happening anyway, . . . unless that it is, inside my Brain held in a bucket of fluid and connected to some alien computer. (Can you say "Matrix?")

But more importantly than this, is not only my search for the "am" in Who am I, its the ever pressing loss of time in making that journey. It seems that the older I get, the faster time seems to be passing me by. Like Sands in an Hour Glass, these are the Days of our Lives.

When do we ever really experience the "Moment?" Well, maybe a few times, when time seems to stand still. Your first love, the time yearning to be near her, the birth of your children, the many celebrated times of "existing" with my loved ones, and of course, when you get a chance to experience the "Big Bang", which I'm told in the French is described by words equating the meaning of "touching heaven". So, whenever I get a chance to touch heaven, which isn't near as often as I'd like, then I'm more in the present than at any other time, which for me, is life.

That should be taught in our Schools, unless it shouldn't be.
You can quote me on that, unless you don't.

Creationism failed completely in its legal attempt in Pennsylvania courts. It is not science in any way , shape, or manner. By the way the judge was a Bush appointee. If you want to teach creationism do in the newly created State Bible class

As most should have learned in school, scientific method teaches us to make a hypothethis, test the hypothesis and then draw conclusions. From this we reach the best fit to explain our observations. They are not always correct (spontaneous generation for example), but subsequently scientific method is applied and we get a better fit. Current science supports a universe in excess of 10 billion years of age and and an earth in excess of 4 billion years, both of which are slightly more than ~6000 years of creationism. Since the foundation of creationism currently appears flawed, we should teach our children the best theory, which is currently evolution, until scientific method moves us to teach new science.

the concept of balancing a checkbook. Perhaps then, when these young ones grow-up and become productive members of society, they can make an intelligent decision on who to vote for.
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.

Well, we shouldn't just stop at teaching Christian creationism, so let's also include some of the other religions too.

Let's include the creator Xenu and his space planes that flew to earth to eradicate over-population by exploding people in ancient volcanoes to release their souls (thetans) into the universe, and the thetans eventually inhabiting humankind:

XENU CREATIONISM

...as long as EVERYONES version is included

Natural selection explains the existence of every type of animal on this planet save one single species. There is a creature that defies natural selection. If natural selection (evolution) held true, this creature would have froze to death in the winter, as it was almost the only land dwelling mammal not to have a thick coat of fur, quite the opposite, it barely had any fur at all.

It would have starved to death because its jaws were to weak to tear raw meat and its stomach to weak to digest it.

This creature would have had a very high mortality rate due to its inability to defend itself from other predators as it had no fierce fangs or sharp claws to attack or stave off a hungry beast.

And surely, this creature should have died off a long time ago for the sole reason that, unlike other creatures when born, the size of its head at birth proved an enormously difficult and injury causing threat for the mother and the newborn animal.

This creature is the only one that directly defies natural selection, paradoxically evolving into a weaker and less naturally adapted animal than its predessesors, yet thriving in the process.

At some point this creature realized it was naked. At some point this creature realized it had emotions. At some point this creature tended the birth of its children. At some point this creature looked up to the heavens and saw heaven looking back, either with the burning and all seeing orange orb that punishes with drought and thirst, yet brings warmth in the morning and summer and spring, or the graceful and approachable orb of the night, waxing and waning and full, to remind us that yes, at one time we were part of the cycle of natural selection, as our Mother's still strum to the tune of the 28 day moon cycle.

But make no mistake about it. WE ARE NOT NATURAL. 15 million years of selection with fur, huge jaws and teeth, small brains, primate walking gait, all disappear in a period of time less than 10 percent in length, and we LOSE these selected traits? How did our brain double in size while we lost our fur, lost our strength, lost our digestive capacity, and lost our teeth.

We just "got" smart one day? There is one theory alone that could explain this that doesn't involve a higher presence. We would have had to evolve (ironically) cut off from the world. At some point our ancestors would have found themselves bound to a relatively small piece of land, probably a medium sized island, free of any large predators, but rich in self generating soft foods such as fruit and insects. Easy to eat and digest. In a tropical climate available year round. Its quite possible, if an island, that volcanic activity may have been present to give us a short lesson on fire and its uses. DNA testing shows that we all came from a group of roughly 5,000 (if I recall, see "Eve Project" on net) but not millions of years ago, rather a few 10s of thousands of years ago. And from that few, in a few thousand years we went to building skyscrapers and space shuttles.

I wonder if the island might have been a research facility for gene testing the local primates. Most perculiar, they have an opposable thumb, a great cardiovascular system for oxygen delivery... what would happen if we gave them some brain mass... Oh, we couldn't do that, they might think in a few thousand years that they were created by us instead of just evolving...

The fact that the question is asked should be a clue. The fact that most of the world believes it should as well. That it is opposed by sheer conjecture and speculation should be the answer, "Of course".

Man, I hate to agree with you, Snif! My belief in intelligent design is my belief but I do NOT want my or anyone else's beliefs being taught as science in school. I believe that there is a Being that created this world and I can see, through observing nature, the evidence of this. But it isn't the same as how science would come to that conclusion. I recognize the subjective portion of my beliefs and that is not science. It has no place in our school's curriculum.

Never Ever!!!!! Yep a silly question...

Not silly....just plain not too bright.

"and the politicians throwing stones...."
"once in a while you can get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right"
"listen to the thunder shouting, "I AM, I AM, I AM"

;>} Have a grateful day ;>}