Media "attacks" on Palin

The GOP-Hannity-Rush storyline on Sarah-of-Arc Palin is now that she has been savagely attacked by the media, which wants to "kill" her.

Let’s examine these “attacks.”

Sarah Palin is nominated from out of right field. 98 percent of Americans have never heard of her. The media starts asking questions such as:

“Who the heck is Sarah Palin?”
“What is her experience?”
“What is her background?”
“What qualifies her from being a heartbeat away from succeeding a 72-yr-old president?”

She's a can-do Mom, ex-small city mayor and popular new governor, we learn. Extra-staunch social conservative who never met an oil rig she didn't like.

An ethical question or two has been raised. Her husband was for several years a member of a political organization founded by a secessionist who hates American institutions. (Said organization falsely claimed Sarah herself as a member at first, and the media dutifully reports its retraction of that claim.)

A couple days after the nomination the Palin campaign ANNOUNCES that 17-year-old Bristol Palin is pregnant. The media reports what was ANNOUNCED IN A PRESS RELEASE. Then they show lots of nice pictures of the family.

These stories pretty much come up and then go away as the news cycle moves on.

Can someone please explain how all this has constituted such a vicious and horrible attack on this poor defenseless damsel?

OR.... is this just the GOP strategy of using the “mainstream media” (which doesn’t really exist anymore, anyway) as the perfect straw dog upon which to build a campaign theme of anger and resentment?

I think we are witnessing a masterful manipulation of media by the very people who scream loudest about manipulative media.

bowser's blog | login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Main Stream's picture
Submitted by Main Stream on Fri, 09/05/2008 - 6:55pm.

This is what happens when a candidate is NOT properly and thoroughly vetted. The media and the public end up performing the vetting process.

The latest Palin story swirling is that Sarah's eldest son, Track, was shipped off to Michigan for a year, in High School, because he had gotten in to trouble by vandalizing a school bus.

I keep hearing that the Palin's are like "all of us" and so "down to earth" and "folksy" but she is NOTHING like me, or my family, or like anyone I would like to be around, not with all these issues and problems related to her and her dysfunctional family.

PALIN FAMILY VALUES


Main Stream's picture
Submitted by Main Stream on Fri, 09/05/2008 - 6:22pm.

I can hardly wait until the VP debates.

JOE vs. PITBULL - bring it on.


Submitted by lion on Fri, 09/05/2008 - 5:12pm.

Each year Alaska residents get a payout from the "Alaska Permanent Fund" for just living in Alaska. This payout is income earned by the state from oil revenues.

This year each resident (man, woman, and child) will get $2,069.

And each man, woman, and child will get an additional $1,200 from the State of Alaska as a "cash payment to help offset the high energy prices."

So each man, woman, and child will get $3,269.

Sarah Palin's family will get $16,345.

Not for working hard. Not for working at all. Just for breathing that great Alaskan air.

I do not think the solution for our energy problems is to drill more and drill now.

But for $3,269 I might change my mind.

How about Alaskans sharing some of that "golden egg" with the rest of us Americans?

Submitted by Nitpickers on Sat, 09/06/2008 - 6:11am.

A family of say five will get 10-11,000 dollars from the oil fund and an aditional 6,000 from the state this year. (16-17,000 total)

It has no limitations as to income or wealth.

Is it any wonder that many want to drill for more oil in that area of the world?

Not very many people in Alaska work, or work very hard! They can't even get to work in the winter (all of the time).

Yet, the Governor of Alaska is a died in the wool "conservative."
An evangelical who wears lipstick and has trouble with her and daughter's morals. (Mother was pregnant when she married, also.)

Not that there is anything wrong with a slip up occasionally! It is the constant hypocrisy that is the problem!

Fred Garvin's picture
Submitted by Fred Garvin on Sat, 09/06/2008 - 7:57am.

Barack Obama's mother was pregnant and unmarried at 17, so what are you getting at here?


Submitted by Bonkers on Sat, 09/06/2008 - 8:46am.

I'll take your word for Obama's Mothe being pregnant when she married, I don't know.

That is not the problem or the point.

The hypocrisy is preaching all of the time against protecting girls against disease and pregnancy and then when your own children, and you, were not practicing abstinence!

These sort of things rarely happens with just one moment of passion which could't be stopped! They go at it all the time!

Take the pill, wear the condom!

Submitted by iliad on Fri, 09/05/2008 - 10:34pm.

The Alaska Permanent Fund is funded by the gasoline we buy for our cars down here in the lower 48. What do you mean "share"? They should "return" the money they're taking from us!!

Submitted by MYTMITE on Fri, 09/05/2008 - 8:09pm.

The Alaska Permanent Fund was established in 1976 as a way to invest the mineral rights royalties for Alaskans. Because savvy people found a way to invest this money wisely, it has grown tremendously. Evidently this is legal, and since it was established 32 years ago, Sarah Palin cannot be blamed for this. I read about this many years ago and when I was in Alaska several years ago, I visited the alaska pipeline and read the history of this fund.
If the monies received from this fund had been invested foolishly there would not be this huge amount of money to distribute. I think they should be applauded for making these wise decisions.

If I am not mistaken, many Alaskan families are financially below the average established for poverty level.

Did you and other Americans return your stimulus checks the government sent out recently? Thought not, and that was a 'give-away'. Why should the Palins not receive the same compensations every Alaskan resident has received for the past thirty two years? Next someone will be saying she had that many children so she could collect more of this fund.

The nitpicking has begun.

Submitted by eldergent on Fri, 09/05/2008 - 5:24pm.

Alaskans pay much more for almost everything they buy. These payouts help cover the extra expense for living there.

Submitted by lion on Fri, 09/05/2008 - 5:56pm.

Alaskans get higher salaries to cover the higher cost of living there.

These oil payouts are on top of this.

Bottom line: Palin and other Alaskans are bribed to support oil drilling.

Submitted by eldergent on Fri, 09/05/2008 - 6:06pm.

to rely on the kindness of OPEC to provide us with oil or maybe you don't use any.

Submitted by lion on Fri, 09/05/2008 - 6:28pm.

I would prefer more honesty in the debate about whether to drill more or not.

When Sarah Palin takes a position on the issue and oh by the way gets a financial benefit because of that position, we should all ask some critical questions about what is really behind the view she takes.

I know that she is an "expert" on energy issues. In Alaska that means cashing that check each year.

yardman5508's picture
Submitted by yardman5508 on Fri, 09/05/2008 - 8:48pm.

Republican VPs are SUPPOSED to profit off their time in government service...that is what it is all about. Getting the most from the government. Why should Palin be any different than Cheney? Keep the faith.

Democracy is not a spectator sport.


carbonunit52's picture
Submitted by carbonunit52 on Fri, 09/05/2008 - 6:55pm.

Of course we will be drilling for more oil in Alaska, and in the Gulf of Mexico. We are not casual users of petroleum, we are hard core addicts, and our addiction is being treated by quacks. Cash money is strong medicine for the corporate witch doctors.

"I can't wait until tomorrow, because I get more lovable every day."


Submitted by Nitpickers on Fri, 09/05/2008 - 6:14pm.

Yeah, but even the stupid French knew not to depend on oil---theirs or ours!
They use nuclear mostly!

We like oil companies to much (and car companies) for that! Or at least in the past we have!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.