I'm so old I had to Google Jenna Jameson. I'm more of the Sally Field type but I worry about her taking too much Boniva. Seems like she takes it every few days instead of once a month.

At least you didn't dis Lindsay Lohan. I'm waiting for her to weigh in on the Israel / Palestine situation before I take a position.

"...it was just John being John."

You mean, him being a senile old man. Maybe that is truly why he gets a pass from the MSM.

Yes, just John being John.

It is McCain's Wife, and he can say most anything he wants about her in my humble opinion. Not all of the entrants into the contest get topless, I know that for a fact. I've had friends who have seen it.

"...he can say most anything he wants about her..."

Like when he called her the C-word?

John McCain can say whatever he wants about his wife, but the kind of moment he had in Sturgis shows that he is just a foolish old man. Not the kind of judgment I want in a President.

Perhaps not all Miss Buffalo Chip contestants have to be topless, but I strongly suspect the winner must.

One Candidate is fairly liberal, the other candidate may be the most liberal person we've ever had running for POTUS from a major party.

I think most folks' problem with this story are two fold:

1. Obama is skewered by the right and constantly covered by the media for words and deeds people he knows or people who he worked with or people who were his pastor have said. When Barack actually says something (bitter people clinging to the gun issue or God issues) there is a thunderous rolling of criticism from the usual suspects explaining how out of touch the young senator is.

John McCain calls his wife the "c" word and the media wash away the fingerprints. The right does not even acknowledge there ever was a crime scene.

John twists facts, throws curse words, or suggests our future first lady enter a contest named for feces; a contest featuring banana swallowing contests, and there is................ silence from the right. Amazingly some of my conservative friends on these blogs see no problem with that behavior from their potential future president. Amazing!

When I couple that with the jokes about killing Iranians with cigarettes and "bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb Iran," I just don't see a person I want in the White House. As for the "most liberal" comment toward Barack: Is that a BAD thing? And is it even true with his support of the second amendment in DC or FISA legislation. Just food for thought.

Cheers,

Kevin "Hack" King

BUT come on, we have ziltch (is that a word?) when it comes to the incoming First Lady!! Both will be an blot on our history...one just worse than the other!!

"...we have ziltch (is that a word?) when it comes to the incoming First Lady!!...one just worse than the other!!"

I'll take the Harvard graduate over the St. Pauli Girl, any day.

Even though I have no great admiration for Cindy McCain, nothing she has said or done can compare to the angry,unpatriotic (never been proud of this country) Michele. To me, there isn't much worse than believing that!

Do you have any idea just how many millions the Pauli girl just got from a European company who bought Bud? She owns a ton of it!

We all will get free Bud upon inauguration.

Free Bud upon inauguration!!!! WOW!!! Throw in some Pizza and it might just be enough. We may not like the President, but with enough Bud...WHO CARES?

The Germany trip was a perfectly legitimate campaign stop even if it did irritate those people who hated seeing Europeans waving US flags in support of an American politician instead of burning them like they do when Republican politicians visit.

Besides, after the successful Iraq trip, and a quick stop in Bethlehem to visit his birth place, it was right on the way home. Why not stop?

That the US is it's Ally.

Are you saying we should worry more about the European's feelings than our own US Citizens?

You posted a silly video with silly comments, I simply replied with my own silly comment.

You saw my tongue in cheek comment about Bethlehem so I think we’re actually on the same page about silly but I think this is a very serious mistake for McCain’s campaign on a serious level.

I’m my opinion, and that’s all it is, the campaign is a referendum on Obama. He’s new, he doesn’t have much of a track record, he doesn’t look like those other Presidents on the dollar bills, etc. etc., while everybody knows who McCain is; or thinks they do. If he keeps this up, trivializing the race with Cindy in a questionable beauty pageant, Paris Hilton, tire gauges, and so on, it’s going to give the Obama people the opportunity to recast the race as a question about McCain. Take the focus off the “unknown factor” about Obama and it seems to me that’s a losing strategy for McCain. McCain’s people have tried to do everything but talk about issues. That may work in August but it’s not going to fly in October. I suspect the Obama people are storing this stuff up for ads in October where they will be able to heavily outspend McCain.

They may be right but it’s a risky strategy and I don’t think a very good one.

Anyone running against the current administration's policies has an advantage in the November election. I admire those who consider themselves Bush loyalists. The Bush policy is a difficult position to defend with the economy, war, global warming, energy, etc. as the issues of the day. McCain's people are using distractions in order to divert attention from the issues. At least this week, both candidates discussed the issues. . . but I wish McCain would improve his delivery!