Don't know. Last time O'Dell was upfront that he was fixing the election for Bush:

Voting Machine Controversy

I think he was surprised by the criticism because people like to think that they have some say in the process. In any case, I haven't heard him say who his pick for us is this year. You'd think Romney since he is Bush on steroids, but that's just supposition; I have not heard it from O'Dell.

Maybe Mixer knows. He moved to Ohio to work for Diebold and fix the elections there again. I wish he would go ahead and tell us who was going to win and end the suspense.

Maybe they have not told Mixer and the other members of the vast right-wing conspiracy who to be for yet. You'd think our friend Mixer would have told us already if he knew.

First of all, I seriously doubt Diebold would tamper with their voting machines in a Democratic election.

I don't think there is any fraud. Hillary and Obama targeted different groups: Obama went after college-educated and rural voters and Hillary went after low-income city dwellers.

The issue here is that Diebold had their machines in virtually all the urban city centers, and Hilary won that vote.

Obama won a huge margin among rural voters, and most rural voters were in towns where hand counts were done.

The large number of hand-counted rural Obama supporters and the large number of machine-counted urban Hilary voters explains the perceived discrepancy.

Quite frankly, I'm more surprised that Romney didn't use his millions to have Diebold tilt the election to himself.

Thanks for the update, bad. This is really disturbing, if this is found to be true. Are we in for the same mess we had in the previous presidential elections, fighting over CHADS again. This is outrageous. Obama won 38% over Hillary 34%??!!!

DIEBOLD MACHINES VS. HAND COUNT