Justice
Two 17 year old male kids had sex with two girls about 15-16 yeas old, and at separate times.
In the one case the act was filmed by a fellow party goer.
In the case of the other one, the girl became pregnant.
In neither case was any force used and both appeared to be consensual, if illegal.
Now in the former case the male was found guilty and sentenced--later released after serving some time.
In the case of the latter, there doesn't appear to be any indication that the male will be charged with anything.
I don't know how many girls under 17 get pregnant every week in the USA, but it is obviously many thousands. Mostly not by rape.
Rarely is anyone charged, which begs the question as to why some are charged.
So, what are the differences in the two cases cited above?
Well, one was filmed by another party-goer and we were shown what we were told was sex.
The only evidence available in the other case is a pregnancy---no film.
Well, there is some more differences: one was black--one was white, and one was poor and one was rich.
Also, in the latter case the girl was obviously allowed to date privately with the boy.
Any suggestions as to what else may have contributed to the different treatment?
FEAR, maybe?
d.smith700's blog | login to post comments
|