-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.

if I could. Perhaps we can have a challenger in the 77th next time.
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.

I owe you lunch. After the new year... let's git-r-done. I look forward to the visit. I'll give you a tour of my place of employment next. Have you ever been in the kitchen of Burger King before? It's got lots of cool stuff like where you work.

I never tell lies about people on my blog.
Especially if I think the truth will do more damage.

I think you both get paid by tax money!

You may own a Burger King, but I doubt you work there.

Absolutely!!! I really want to see just how hard Jane works. Is she on the fry or burger line?

-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.

There is no "or" to it, I'm on all lines all the time, no stopping, and keep everyone else moving too. . .gotta go, that buzzer thingy is going off. . .need to see if it's the fries or the fire alarm!

Certainly Mr Brown will take stands on what he believes to be right, and for that I laud him. What is of concern, however, is that by doing so he will alienate himself from the majority of our party under the gold dome. Fayette County runs the risk of being denied grants or, at best, reduced funding based upon the performance of the District 72 Representative.
Has he mellowed to the point of siding with multiple term contemporaries who hold the purse strings when it comes to something of significance to our district? If elected, I certainly hope so. But in reality, I cannot believe that in two short years that he has changed his character from what it was as our Mayor.
This election is of significance. Do we elect an individual who we know to be divisive, or an up and comer who remains noncomittal and vague with the obvious backing of the purported "good old boys."
Tomorrow is the day, let's all get out and vote if we haven't already. Fayette County deserves to be represented by a majority of the registered voters not just a concerned minority.

I think Ramsey has already been briefed on what he should do!

I doubt anyone has told Brown what he should do!

Take your pick for the least mistakes.

I liked what you had to say in the campaign. You and Sturbaum ran a good race.

Put Steve Brown in now. If he acts like a liberal jerk, vote him out in July. Heck, you can run against him.

Brown ain't gonna vote for more development or traffic in PTC. Rammy will.

I understand your concern, Mr. King, but truthfully, the next elected representative from District 72 will have the absolute lowest seniority in the state legislature. I suspect Fayette county will not see much, if any, grants or funding until the next general election.

I cannot recall the late Rep. Lakly securing much in the way of grants or funds for Fayette either...I could be wrong.

In any event, "nothing" is preferable to the shiny state-approved TDK road that I believe Matt Ramsey would "gift" us with.

No one is that bad!

But it wouldn't hurt for someone to go there who doesn't already have an agenda.

Steve Brown is the Safest Choice. I would agree.

Sniffles is Right About Brown

He can't hurt us much. Rammy can. Brown will be elected AFTER the legislature opens up. How much time will he have? Rammy on the other hand already has Seabaugh waiting with open arms to sign off on a TDK Bill in the House, complete with whatever "Goody Bag". He already warned us "I am ready to go."

So, What Exactly Is Rammy Going To Ram Up Our.... Whoops, comprehensive plan.

Andrew Dice Clay, you make an astute observation in stating that Lawyer Ramsey is ready to roll. His agenda is set and his financiers have fully funded their objectives.

I never tell lies about people on my blog.
Especially if I think the truth will do more damage.

The point you make about TDK is the issue. With it on the drawing board, Peachtree City as we know it is doomed. The only one of the two who actually supported TDK was Mr Brown before he was against it (Memories of a past campaign?). Pardon me if I have a concern about what this could do to our city.
Hopefully, Mr Brown can make me believe he is truly against this project this time. After all, wasn't it him who used substantial city dollars to promote the project?

I thought you were for it!
Might as well be, it will be done at this late date.

You say we perhaps need to overlook Steve Brown who appears somewhat divisive because he fought and bucked the 'corrupt and unethical lawyer / developer hacks' that he opposed? You think being divisive (standing up to the bad guys) is worse that profiting personally via government power at the expense of the taxpayers?

Perhaps it is a good thing you lost your election. I wasn't so sure until now.

I never tell lies about people on my blog.
Especially if I think the truth will do more damage.

Perhaps you need to read what was said. I simply point out two major distinctions between the two (my opinion). There are pros and cons to either.
Mr Brown is to be commended for exposing the corruption within Peachtree City, but in doing so he stumbled to the point of receiving some nineteen percent of votes cast in his runoff loss to our current mayor. In short, not all of his stances were correct.
Perhaps, attaining a conconcensus or maybe better communication would have won him an additional four years.
Never will I say look over someone, I merely point out the need for the electorate to exercise their right to choose by casting their ballot.

So he lost because he bucked something wrong, which most of those who voted the other way didn't know.
Better to do right than get re-elected (or promoted in the case of the military).

I simply point out two major distinctions between the two (my opinion)

I only saw that you were making your distinctions as negatives toward Brown without mentioning the negatives of his opponents.

I merely point out the need for the electorate to exercise their right to choose by casting their ballot.

I'm sorry but after reading again your post, I didn't see anything that would show distinctions between Brown and the candidates. Only shots at Steve being divisive.

As for me... my thoughts are we put Steve in and see how he does for the next year or so. After that??? If he sucks, we'll hopefully have a better slate of candidates to choose from. Of the four that are running, Steve Brown is the cream of this

I never tell lies about people on my blog.
Especially if I think the truth will do more damage.

My apology is offered if I was not equally negative to both. That said, other than the substantial outlay of contributor cash is there to say about young Ramsey?
Should either win, there relection next year will be interesting because Mr Brown will not change course and Mr Ramsey's treasure chest will remain considerable.

You are a good man to discuss issues with. Perhaps we need to keep you around for a future run. LOL! I stand by my original assumptions and believe you to have been a good candidate.

I never tell lies about people on my blog.
Especially if I think the truth will do more damage.

You sir, are a breath of fresh air. Thanks to you, Sniffles, ptctaxpayer and others perhaps we have placed what I consider to be the most pressing issue facing our town to the forefront--TDK.
Now I have to get some work done.
MERRY CHRISTMAS!