OH MY GOSH! Now we know the rest of the story ...

Take a look at who's supporting Matt Ramsey for the late Dan Lakly's seat.

It's the same people who support TDK, Peachtree National bailout and Mayor Harold Logsdon.

If it was a movie, you'd call it "Taxpayers Get the Shaft II." I don't want to see the sequel of that horror flick.

Matthew and Melissa Ramsey

The Committee to Elect Mac Collins

Hollis L. Harris

Steve & Anne Ramsey

Chris & Kim Thompson

Dan & Kristin Vano

Joseph Domenic Greco II & Kathryn Greco

Ben & Heather Maroney

Ken Steele, Mayor, City of Fayetteville

Joel Cowan, Former Mayor, Peachtree City

Ralph Jones, Former Mayor, Peachtree City

Robert Lenox, Former Mayor, Peachtree City

Chip Conner, Former Mayor, Peachtree City

Fred Brown, Jr., Former Mayor, Peachtree City

Thomas & Vicki A. Turner

Paul Gorski

Robert & Brandi Tindell

Kevin & Laura O’Neill

Robert & Kathryn Muller

Mark Gray Insurance, Inc. (Mark & Kathy Gray)

Crescent II, LLC (Michael Holcomb & David Sparkman, Members)

Douglas and Carol Warner

John Lee Bethune III & Dorothy Bethune

Jeff & Lynn Roberts

Chad & Jennifer Cummings

Michael J. Mahaffey, D.M.D.

Chris & Susan Parrott

Henry & Valerie Inglesby

J.B. & Mary Sue Behnken

M.D. Publishing, Inc. (John Krieg, President)

johenry's blog | login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by Jones on Wed, 11/28/2007 - 2:23pm.

Why does that cast of unsavory characters surprise you? They were a given. This is Harold Logsdon, Part Two.

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Wed, 11/28/2007 - 9:01am.

For publicly posting his donor list as requested before the election instead of forcing us to wait until after the election. We will however, see what it looks like when it comes out the Secretary of State's disclosure webpage after the election. There might be some contributions that Mr. Ramsey may desire to postpone disclosing until after the election. Eye-wink

I agree with Mr. Henry. At least we now know Ramsey's true 'make-up', so that at least we (the voters) can make an informed decision as to whether we desire a 'controlled growth' candidate or a 'developer / lawyer high density growth' candidate.

Happy Voting! Smiling

tortugaocho's picture
Submitted by tortugaocho on Wed, 11/28/2007 - 9:10am.

The newspaper asked each candidate to disclose. That's why Matt Ramsey did it.

What he didn't disclose is even more important: (1) when was the money given [was he planning on running against Dan] (2) how much did each of these parties give (3) what are their trades or occupations (are developers, lawyers or bankers) (4) what was the total amount given from contributors who gave less than $101? If he puts that on this website I will be impressed. Until then, "we won't get fooled again".

I will vote for Matt Ramsey if he will promise three things:
(1) to support a metro-wide moratorium on new construction until the drought is solved; (2) vote to never support, fund or vote for TDK in any way; (3) to never support changing any of our districts. Just say no-- and this includes ALL districts. Brown's referendum idea would be ok. Until then, we are fine the way we are up and down the line.

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Wed, 11/28/2007 - 9:25am.

Turtle Man,

Did you read my entire post or just the Subject line?

Anyone, with any knowledge and history of our area can look at the names disclosed and put two and two together. Also, like I said, the 'straight poop' will come out after the election. After it's too late.

I've said it many times and it bears repeating; just look at the company Lawyer Ramsey keeps and it's ever so obvious as to how much of 'Judas Seabaugh' this guy will turn out to be.

On the issues at hand, I don't trust this guy as far as I can throw him. And that ain't very far.

tortugaocho's picture
Submitted by tortugaocho on Wed, 11/28/2007 - 9:32am.

Poor Git...But Spear Guy agrees with you apparently on the district voting thing. On that issue, I say don't change any districts, don't increase staffs and payroll. None of that.

On the disclosures...Look, if Ramsey raised say $10,000 from 7 people a few weeks before Dan died that means that they opposed Dan (I supported him) and they had an agenda worth investing money in. Instead, let's assume they were making their cash calls during the funeral. I still don't most of these people and I don't know, for example, if the Group VI lady gave $2,000 or $200. Big difference.

Submitted by skyspy on Wed, 11/28/2007 - 8:14am.

You are definitly known by the company you keep, no matter how low you have to go to find a friend.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.