-->
Search the ArchivesNavigationContact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
Spear Road Guy: Where were you?Where were you when Gitreal and I were having our knock-down drag-out but stay-friends the whole-time discussion on why one votes democratic or republican? With the "vote republican" tag line at the end of your posts, you obviously have an opinion. Hopefully you'll entertain this question from me: Why? I was at the guitar center today lookin at some sweet electronic drum kits when I saw one musician's car. The bumper sticker said "Democrat and Republican: Same @#$% different name." My initial thoughts were that this bumpersticker is bread of ignorance or apathy. You either don't know the party's stands on major issues or you just don't care about them. For instance, if one wants the billions of dollars being spent on Iraq's infrastructure to shift towards domestic infrastructure and the war in Afghanistan, you'd best vote for a democrat. If you want a less intrusive Patriot Act, better financial accounting in Iraq, stricter control on security contractors, expansion of SCHIP and programs to help the over 1.8 million veterans who have no health coverage (an increase of 290,000 since President Bush took office according to the Department of Veteran's Affairs), you would need to vote for democrats, as Republicans are currently opposing such reforms. If you feel torture should not be reworded and used under a different name, again, democrats along with John McCain and Chuck Hagel are your best bets. If you want to see diplomacy given a full chance before we run head first into war with Iran, democrats are the safer bet. If you would like the Consumer Protection Agency to grow teeth and pursue manufacturers of lead based and toxic toys, an expansion of powers that the GOP appointed Director amazingly opposes, you'd best vote in democrats. Right now you're saying "these expansions would cost money. How do we pay for it?" Well, not like our President currently pays (using financing that our kid's kids will pay). Like Warren Buffet is pointing out: He pays about 16.8% of payroll income in tax. His secretaries and rank and file employees pay, on average, 30+%. Does this make sense? The people who have the least money benefit the least from our supply side tax structure? If this does make sense, by all means, vote Republican. But I, like Warren Buffet, feel that bringing the mega rich's tax obligation in to a range comparable to the average guy's percentage of contribution would help us balance the federal budget and ween ourselves from indebtedness to China. This is more an idea of democrats than it is of don't tax but still spend republicans. If you, like me, feel that gays are used as political footballs in a very hatefull way, you might vote for the democrats (did you hear another REPUBLICAN, Richard Curtis, quit today because his CROSS-DRESSING and gay sex were discovered?) I believe republican anti-gay rhetoric fuels churches like the one in Kansas that pickets funerals saying "God hates F@##s". They certainly aren't motivated by democratic literature. They have said they feel troop deaths in Iraq are due to our nation's tolerance of gays. Sounds like Falwell doesn't it? Republicans I'd vote for? Hagel, Specter, Walter Jones (R-NC), Olympia Snowe, Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) So, Spear road guy: Why should any independent or fence-rider vote "straight" (pardon the pun) Republican tickets, aside from the fact that it is fixed at the bottom of your posts? I'd like to hear your logic. Kevin Hack King ps: Isn't Logsden a Republican? AF A-10's blog | login to post comments |