New blogging rules

JeffC's picture

I have noticed that there are several complaints about spelling, sentence construction and such here on the blog. I am hereby sharing the proper rules taught to me by my writing classes. From now on, please follow the following rules and your writing will be much improved:

Always avoid alliteration. Prepositions are not words to end sentences with. Avoid clichés like the plague -- they're old hat. Parenthetical remarks (however relevant) are unnecessary. It is wrong to ever split an infinitive. Contractions aren't necessary. Do not use a foreign word when there is an adequate English quid pro quo. One should never generalize. Comparisons are as bad as clichés. Don't use more words than necessary; it's highly superfluous. Understatement is always best. Exaggeration is a billion times worse than understatement. One word sentences? Eliminate. Always! Analogies in writing are like feathers on a snake. The passive voice should not be used. Take the bull by the hand and avoid mixed metaphors -- even if a mixed metaphor sings, it should be derailed. Don't use commas, that, are not, necessary. Do not use hyperbole; not one in a million can do it effectively. Who needs rhetorical questions? Never use a big word where a diminutive alternative would suffice. Subject and verb always has to agree. Be more or less specific. Placing a comma between subject and predicate, is not correct. Don't never use double negatives. Use the apostrophe in it's proper place and omit it when its not needed. Don't repeat yourself, or say again what you have said before. Use youre spell chekker to avoid mispelling and to catch typograhpical errers. Don't be redundant. Again, don't be redundant. Hopefully, you will use words correctly, irregardless of how others use them. No sentence fragments. Don't indulge in sesquipedalian lexicological constructions. Don't overuse exclamation marks!!! A writer must not shift your point of view. Place pronouns as close as possible, especially in long sentences, as of 10 or more words, to their antecedents. Everyone should be careful to use a singular pronoun with singular nouns in their writing. The adverb always follows the verb.

Blog on!

JeffC's blog | login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
pentapenguin's picture
Submitted by pentapenguin on Wed, 05/30/2007 - 6:27pm.

Thank you Mr. Carter for the laugh! Smiling

------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Get Firefox for a better, safer, and more enjoyable web browsing experience!


Richard Hobbs's picture
Submitted by Richard Hobbs on Wed, 05/30/2007 - 5:34pm.

Jeff,

I want you to know, I copied and shared this with my booger eating bedwetting liberal attorney friends who debate with me online. I assume your article was not plagerized, so I gave you full faith and credit for your work.

I do wonder how you have so much time to do such things. I mean you aren't a governmental employee or anything are you?

Enjoyed the read. Will of course wait to reply to something contraversial when something comes up.


Gump's picture
Submitted by Gump on Wed, 05/30/2007 - 11:25pm.

Jeff,
I read your "grammar tips" and immediately forwarded it to a couple of English teachers I know. Even if you didn't write it, thanks for passing it on! (I did credit you as the source, just like Richard did.) I just hope they haven't already seen it before.

By the way, I was at Marist back when you were at Woodward. I seem to recall we routinely whipped you guys at just about every sport. Did you play any team sports back then?


JeffC's picture
Submitted by JeffC on Thu, 05/31/2007 - 1:03pm.

Gump, You couldn't be talking football. I remembered it a little differently and took a few minutes to check it out. Sure enough, Marist was the Regional Champ in 1979 following a thirty year drought. I couldn’t find results on Georgia Military Academy before it became Woodward but some of that huge gap in Marist’s record can be probably be filled in by Woodward’s Regional Championships in 1970, 1973, 1974, 1976, 1977, 1980, 1982, 1983, 1985, etc. Maybe Marist was the team that beat us the year I graduated in 1970 when we went 13-1 and won the State Championship. If so, y'all were probably so happy to beat such a powerhouse that you remember it as a great season.


Gump's picture
Submitted by Gump on Thu, 05/31/2007 - 1:26pm.

We made it to the state playoffs in '72, my senior year, but lost to Westminster. I also played soccer, and I was hoping that maybe you were on the Woodward team that we played. Woodward probably did beat us--our soccer team wasn't much good back then. But I remember that we had Woodward's number in football, at least during the years when I was on the team. (I was second-string, so it wasn't because of my presence that we won.) We also used to be rivals with St. Pius. Of course we always mis-pronounced "Pius" to sound like a kitty-cat, as boys will do. Eye-wink


Gump's picture
Submitted by Gump on Thu, 05/31/2007 - 5:21pm.

I confirmed that Woodward did indeed win the state championship in '70, but I also show that we beat Woodward 7-0 that year in the regular season. Of course, we all tend to remember the part that favors us, so I remembered the win and not the rest. You remembered the state championship, as well you should.

Anyway, it was a good excuse to get out the old yearbooks and reminisce.


Submitted by dollaradayandfound on Thu, 05/31/2007 - 4:40am.

I take it Marist is Catholic and Woodward is Baptist? Notre Dame has a lot of those Irish who play football: Magursky, Lobotomiski, dumkirkiski, and polanski.

Gump's picture
Submitted by Gump on Thu, 05/31/2007 - 8:40am.

Marist is Catholic-run, but primarily college prep, not religious. As far as I can tell, Woodward is not affiliated with any denomination. It started out as a military academy, as did Marist. When I went to Marist, we wore Air Force ROTC uniforms every day, and it was male-only. Two years after I graduated, Marist dropped the military part and allowed girls to attend. (Big improvement, as far as the girls, but I was disappointed they dropped the ROTC program.) I was not Catholic, and about half the student body is not Catholic, so don't think of it as a Catholic parochial school. It's college prep all the way.


JeffC's picture
Submitted by JeffC on Wed, 05/30/2007 - 10:40pm.

I really did get some of it from a class so it's not all mine. I do not know who should get the original credit.

No I'm not a government employee, heaven forbid! Besides, all the governments are run by Republicans now. Who would hire me?

I, too, am waiting for the controversy. If Bas didn't provoke people, half the blog would disappear.

By the way, I think all the Mexicans who are here illegally should just be granted citizenship ASAP. That way they would not be illegal anymore. Problem solved!


cruiserman's picture
Submitted by cruiserman on Tue, 05/29/2007 - 10:21pm.

is a preposition.


Submitted by dollaradayandfound on Wed, 05/30/2007 - 6:21am.

You caught Jeff writin down also a mistook!!

I never noticed eny mistooks in his writin thar!

Looked fine tuh me.

Denise Conner's picture
Submitted by Denise Conner on Tue, 05/29/2007 - 1:28am.

Hilarious Laughing out loud

Haven't read this for a while but always find it amusing. Go ahead, $ & Bas, & laugh. I know that you will. Smiling


Submitted by swmbo on Mon, 05/28/2007 - 11:33pm.

Don't never use no triple negative. Laughing out loud

-------------------------------
If you and I are always in agreement, one of us is likely armed and dangerous.

Paul Perkins's picture
Submitted by Paul Perkins on Mon, 05/28/2007 - 11:05pm.

__________________________________________________________________
All good points. The bigger question I see is this. Is it possible to end a sentence with the word the?


Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Mon, 05/28/2007 - 11:04pm.

I'm toast. Smiling

________

"That man was Griffin Judicial Circuit District Attorney Scott Ballard".

CLICK HERE FOR THE REST OF THE STORY


Submitted by bladderq on Mon, 05/28/2007 - 10:58pm.

Dude, where did you go to school...Woodward?
By-the-way, I recognize "Irregardless" as a perfectly good word.

Denise Conner's picture
Submitted by Denise Conner on Tue, 05/29/2007 - 1:24am.

Nonstandard English -- Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when, in fact, it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or (very) casual writing [to put it politely].

Its usage has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless, resulting in the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir– prefix and –less suffix in a single term causing redundancy.

How can one be less unmindful, or un-unmindful? Puzzled

Sorry, I couldn't resist! Laughing out loud


JeffC's picture
Submitted by JeffC on Tue, 05/29/2007 - 12:07am.

Why am I up at 1:00 when I have to be at work tomorrow? Woodward, Class of '70.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.