Bush most liberal of U.S. presidents

Tue, 11/08/2005 - 5:00pm
By: Letters to the ...

In reading Trey Hoffman’s comments regarding liberals (“Liberals seem like poor losers”), it occurs to me that he has an identity crisis.

I assume from his letter of 10/19 that he views Republicans, including the President, as conservative. Nothing could be further from the truth.

I’m surprised that it hasn’t occurred to more Republicans that the current Republican administration in Washington is among the most LIBERAL of any administration in modern times. The proof is clear and abundant, and is becoming more so with each passing day. Consider:

1. Fiscal policy. How is it, despite Iraq and hurricanes, that our federal budget deficit and discretionary spending is a tsunami of red ink? The liberal Republicans of the current administration throw money at pork willy-nilly and run up huge debts no matter the consequences. My conservative forebears taught me that you don’t spend what you don’t have.

2. Energy policy. How is it that, content with ridiculously low fuel efficiency standards, the liberal Republicans are happy to use oil resources as if they were inexhaustible?

This liberal thinking exposes us to the whims of the religion (you know, the religion of the government of Saudi Arabia from whence 15 out of 19 of the 9/11 hijackers came) which this president has said we must defeat?

To my conservative (do you notice that word “conserve” in the word “conservative”?) way of thinking, if the liberal Republicans truly were conservative, the policies would be those of a wise caretaker prudently managing a dwindling resource. You think our nation’s security and $3 a gallon for gas are issues now? Just wait.

3. Military policy. How is it that the scum responsible for 9/11 (remember Osama Bin Laden?) is still alive and breathing? If the liberal Republicans truly were conservative, it would be abundantly obvious that an eye for an eye, and then some, would be a good place to start and then FINISH as the first and most important priority in dealing the terrorists led by (what’s his name?) Osama Bin Laden.

In addition, anyone with half a military brain, and I am a veteran by the way, knew that 20,000 troops, in a country with 275,000 square miles of topography infinitely worse than the Badlands, would not constitute the conservative, i.e., overwhelming force required to guarantee bringing that man (what was his name, Osama Bin Laden?) to justice. I won’t even go there as concerns Iraq because I could fill up the entire newspaper with the liberalism of the debacle.

4. Immigration policy. How is it that illegal immigrants are, essentially, welcomed with open arms, and treated in many cases better than our own legal citizens? To my conservative mind, I wonder why the liberal Republicans don’t enforce the laws on the books. I suspect our forefathers are spinning in their graves as we speak.

5. Judicial policy. How is it that, in the glaring light of our liberal president’s latest Supreme Court nomination, one issue, Roe v. Wade, is this liberal president’s litmus test for qualification to serve on the highest court in the land?

I’m amazed that the current liberal Republicans can say, “We need a judge who won’t legislate from the bench,” with a straight face.

Personally, I’m against abortion, and have living proof in my life of the wisdom of my views, but basing qualification for the Supreme Court on one issue is naive and myopic at best, far from conservative, and considering the scope of other cases to arise in the future, an ominous sign.

6. Washington politics. How is it that this liberal president, who shouted promises to clean up the swampy mess of politics inside the beltway and restore integrity to the White House, instead primed the pump (read Tom Delay, Jack Abramoff, Ralph Reed, etc.) for an explosion of lobbyists and cronies that has taken swamp politics and the liberal Republicans to a new low?

A true conservative should recognize that a Republican who is truly conservative would know that less is more, especially where Washington is concerned, and that integrity really does matter in life. Really.

Sadly, there’s plenty more, but if you don’t see the sheer and flat-out disgusting liberalism of the current Republican administration by now, you probably never will.

Suffice it to say that I can’t think of a single governmental issue that affects my life where I don’t see rampant liberalism in the current administration.

The matter at hand isn’t the “poor loser” liberal Democrats, but the liberal Republicans who are soon to be losers because they’ve forgotten what it means to be a conservative.

Paul Wilder
Peachtree City, Ga.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by Jeff Carter on Wed, 11/09/2005 - 3:58pm.

I was totally baffled by Paul Wilder’s letter accusing Try Hoffman of having an identy crisis, (“Bush most liberal of U.S. presidents”), until I realized that everything he doesn’t like has to be called “liberal.” It seems to me that the crisis’ is Mr. Wilder’s and that he is in serious denial about today’s conservatives. Fiscal policy? When the Bush administration took office, the country was a little over $5.7 trillion in debt. As of the beginning of November this year, the debt is now over $8 trillion, an increase of over two and a quarter trillion dollars. At the average interest rate published by the Bureau of Public Debt that adds up to an increase of over $108 billion of interest per year. The numbers are so large as to be almost meaningless but perhaps saying that the increase in the interest on the public debt run up by the Republicans and President Bush is more than $296.9 million dollars per day is more comprehensible. Yes, that is just the increase in interest payments. Astonishingly, it was back in the liberal Clinton days when Alan Greenspan warned that the US was paying off the debt too fast and projected a $500 billion surplus for this year. Since the conservative Republicans have taken over the entire government, that problem at least has been solved. And complaining that fuel economy standards are too low is because of “liberal” Republicans is just weird. Its real liberals who have been trying to increase CAFE standards and who have been fought bitterly by the administration and the Republicans. Does Mr. Wilder know any Republicans who support increasing fuel standards or who favor government development programs for alternative energy? I admit that I don’t. Then, it seemed to me anyway, Paul slipped from weird into bizarre complaining that the administration has forgotten about Osama bin Laden and the war in Iraq. I fear he has taken my liberal Democrat position that the President and the Republicans, who, I have to note again, control all branches of government, lost sight of the 9/11 attackers and elected instead to invade Iraq which was not involved. I agree it’s a debacle but since he didn’t want to go there, I won’t either. However, I would say that it is mighty hard to blame that one on the liberals. Immigration policy? I can’t say much about the administration’s immigration policy although I’ll be happy to comment if they ever formulate one. But the truly strange part of Mr. Wilder’s letter concerned the criticism of the selection of Supreme Court nominees based on their willingness to overturn Roe vs. Wade as a liberal litmus test by the President. I disagree with the most liberal amongst us on the issue but surely Mr. Wilder knows that EVERYTHING is subservient to Roe vs. Wade in conservative’s acceptance of a nominee. And his final point associating liberals with Tom Delay, Ralph Reed and Jack Abramoff and the Republican policies allowing an explosion of lobbyists and cronies in a political swamp? Well, I can’t even get my head around that one. But all is not lost and I have good news for Mr. Wilder. He can come on over to our side. Support fiscal sanity, a real energy policy, a military strategy that doesn’t include elective wars and that doesn’t support disregarding real military officers planning and conducting a war if one becomes necessary. Recognize that the identity crisis is yours Mr. Wilder and that all those things you are complaining about are the conservative positions and are only liberal in your fantasies. Join us in the reality based world. We real liberals need all the help we can get.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.