PTC Council: ‘Slow down on regional review of West Village’

Tue, 08/22/2006 - 4:59pm
By: John Munford

Peachtree City’s City Planner is worried about how quickly regional planners will handle a request from two developers to annex and rezone 859 acres and build more than 1,600 homes on the city’s west side ... despite the fact that the City Council hasn’t even voted whether or not to annex the parcels and rezone a third tract necessary for the project.

The development proposed by John Wieland Homes and Levitt and Sons is large enough to be considered a “development of regional impact” and thus must be reviewed by the Atlanta Regional Commission and the Georgia Regional Transportation Agency. Rast said he learned at a recent meeting that the matter may be ready for a planning commission meeting as early as November.

Several city council members said, “Whoa!” at Thursday night’s council meeting, noting they weren’t about to sign off on the plans based on the number of homes proposed.

The City Council, Planning Commission and Comprehensive Plan task force will hold a combined meeting Monday night at 7 p.m. at City Hall to hear details from both developers about the current status of their plans. Both Levitt and Wieland have filed “step 2” annexation applications with the city.

Rast said if the city changes the density 20 percent in either direction from the figures presented to the regional agencies, the plans would have to be resubmitted.

A density change of more than 20 percent “is more than likely,” said City Councilwoman Judi-ann Rutherford. Councilwoman Cyndi Plunkett also indicated she was opposed to the densities of the projects.

Levitt has not revised its requested density despite a strong suggestion from council to do so when it first agreed to consider Levitt’s proposal several months ago.

Wieland tempered its original request with a lower density for the annexed property, but the density on the 80-acre townhome parcel already in the city is quite high, especially considering it is currently zoned for general industrial use.

The parcels proposed for annexation, which are currently in the unincorporated area of Fayette County, are zoned by the county for lots with a minimum size of two acres each. The county defended a lawsuit several years ago that ended with the court upholding that zoning designation.

Rast noted that this is the city’s first large-scale development that must be reviewed by the Atlanta Regional Commission and the Georgia Regional Transportation Authority. State regulations require the DRI review process to begin when a developer initiates a request for action from the local government, but it does not require any action from the government.

ARC’s policy is to include local government agencies when reviewing DRI plans, according to the ARC web site.

But Rast feels differently after leaving the first ARC meeting held on the project.

“My feeling is that the city is left out of the process,” Rast said.

Rast explained that GRTA would require the city to finish any necessary transportation element of the subdivisions should the developer default on either.

Wieland wants to build 881 homes on 458 acres on the city’s west side, with 335 townhomes and the remainder being single family homes. Just to the north, Levitt wants to build 752 single family homes on a 400-acre parcel in a self-contained “active adult” housing community.

The townhome plan for Wieland calls for 335 townhomes on a 79-acre site. Wieland also wants to build a 5.7 acre neighborhood retail center.

Both developers will participate in building a bridge so MacDuff Parkway can span the railroad tracks and link with Old Senoia Road — also known as Old Highway 74 —at an at-grade crossing. MacDuff will ultimately link up with the traffic light at the intersection of Ga. Highway 74 and the northern end of Kedron Drive.

Rast noted that growing the city by annexation was a significant concern for many residents on the city’s recent planning survey.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Steve Brown's picture
Submitted by Steve Brown on Wed, 08/23/2006 - 12:04pm.

I cannot believe that Wieland is proposing 335 townhomes - that is a disaster. Wieland had previously agreed to around 300 homes total, I made the motion, on their site (see City Council minutes, phase I approval) and that included construction of the South Kedron access. Now the number is 881, unbelievable.

The Levitt people are going for a killing also. If we annex, how are we paying for municipal services to that area again?

Maybe it's time to regroup.

Steve Brown


Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Wed, 08/23/2006 - 3:50pm.

I was in favor of what Weiland had originally proposed, which I believe included ball fields etc.

Have they sold all of the townhomes they have built to this point? That always seemed to be the slowest product. They are nice, I've been in them, and they aren't cheap. Maybe they are selling MUCH better than I realized.

Submitted by Jones on Tue, 08/22/2006 - 8:22pm.

I honestly think that the developers are going to extort the city council over that @#%* bridge. We will give away the store just to get some candy. It is all going down the tubes.

PTC Guy's picture
Submitted by PTC Guy on Tue, 08/22/2006 - 8:37pm.

No bridge, no approval? At any density.

-----------------------------
Keeping it real and to the core of the issue, not the peripherals.


bad_ptc's picture
Submitted by bad_ptc on Tue, 08/22/2006 - 8:54pm.

GRTA, to a city near you.


PTC Guy's picture
Submitted by PTC Guy on Tue, 08/22/2006 - 8:57pm.

We will see.

-----------------------------
Keeping it real and to the core of the issue, not the peripherals.


Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Tue, 08/22/2006 - 8:49pm.

I totally agree.

Spear Road Guy's picture
Submitted by Spear Road Guy on Tue, 08/22/2006 - 11:21pm.

But McDonoughDawg, the real question is what is the bridge really worth? I think there's a good reason Levit & Sons hasn't dropped a single housing unit from their plan: they have the city by the throat over the bridge. If the plan doesn't meet reasonable standards, you have to be able to walk away from it and try again the next time.

In all honesty, I don't think the city council has the guts to play hardball with Levit and Wieland. I sure hope I'm wrong, but I think the council is going to say, "Alright do whatever you want as long as we get the bridge."

I think the TDK property purchase set the tone for how the council will behave. Pathway wouldn't commit on selling all the way up to the FAA deadline and Logsdon and company finally said, "Here take all the money, just give us the land!"

Based upon the latest news postings, it appears we're all going to pay a heck of a lot for that extention road.

Vote Republican


Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Wed, 08/23/2006 - 10:16am.

What's it worth? Who knows? It could be considered priceless if it's installed. It could be worthless if we never have traffic tie up the southern end of McDuff.

I really don't have a problem with the density of the Senior Project myself. It's going to be fairly well self contained, and full of Old Timers who won't cause trouble. I've been in his developments, and believe me, they are nice.

On the other hand, I think Wieland needs to scale down his density somewhat. 1 per acre probably isn't reasonable, but there has to be a compromise.

Best thing for us to do, is let our BOC (PTC) know how we feel.

The development in Coweta, that's somewhat expected by me, I've driven to Newnan enough to realize they want it, and they want it bad. We must get 74 ready, and look for another route to the Interstate for this area that doesn't include 74.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.