-->
Search the ArchivesNavigationContact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
Dunn pursues sheriff dispute to U.S. Att’y GeneralTue, 08/08/2006 - 4:31pm
By: John Munford
Fayette County Commission Chairman Greg Dunn has taken his dispute with the Fayette County Sheriff’s Department to U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Dunn has written a letter to Gonzales urging him to stop the disbursement of federal drug seizure money to the sheriff’s office or instead funnel the money through the county’s finance department. Dunn contends that Sheriff Randall Johnson “has not provided the board with documentation supporting how the funds have been expended.” Sheriff’s officials say that’s not so, noting that the funds have been reviewed on several occasions by county finance staff in addition to a forensic auditing firm that was hired by the county. “He’s lying like a dog,” Sheriff Randall Johnson said of Dunn’s allegation that his office hasn’t fully opened its books on the drug seizure funds. The county commission previously attempted to have the drug funds routed through the county coffers instead of going directly to the sheriff’s office. But the U.S. Department of Justice, which administers that program, nixed that because the funds must go directly to the intended law enforcement agency, according to federal guidelines. Nonetheless, Dunn’s letter to Gonzales states the county again wants to have the drug funds routed through the county’s finance department instead of the checks going directly to the sheriff’s office. In the letter, Dunn notes that the Department of Justice “classified this as a local issue for the county to handle” and takes issue with the drug fund payments continuing to the sheriff’s department since the county commission has declined to file two pieces of paperwork necessary to continue doing so as part of an attempted protest against the sheriff’s department. “The expenditure of these funds has the effect of increasing liability exposure to the board by the manner in which the funds are used (if not in compliance with the federal guidelines) or by the property which is purchased by these funds,” Dunn wrote. “This additional liability is unacceptable to the board.” Dunn suggested that since an “exception” for the paperwork requirement has been carved for Fayette County, the feds should also allow the county to be indemnified from any legal action that might stem from that new procedure. A local lawsuit is pending to resolve this and similar disputes between the sheriff and the county commission. The most recent order in the suit requires Johnson to dispose of property through the county, but does not require the sheriff to purchase property using county procedures and guidelines. Dunn’s letter to Gonzales indicates the county commission may not be ready to make nice despite a recommendation from the judge in the pending lawsuit that both sides should broker a resolution to the case. Dunn said in the letter to Gonzales that the board of commissioners wants the matter addressed, but the letter was only signed by Dunn instead of each individual county commissioner. Dunn recently lost his reelection bid in the Republican primary to a supporter of the sheriff, attorney Eric Maxwell. Dunn’s term runs through the end of December this year. login to post comments |