-->
Search the ArchivesNavigationContact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
Why I’m voting for Dunn, WellsThis election, life would be simpler if I were a Democrat. Few choices, few decisions, no thinking. But I’ll be asking for a Republican ballot, as usual. And thus I’ve had to do some pondering on several of the races. My decisions, not easily arrived at, are as follows: Fayette County Commission, Post 4: incumbent Linda Wells. That’s who. Here’s why. First, Dunn and Wells. For me, the choice must boil down to one overriding concern: Who will best conserve what we have today in Fayette County? Both Dunn and Wells have consistently stood as a bulwark against ever-increasing demands of developers to build bigger and more dense projects. Dunn and Wells have been conservatives. Both Dunn and Wells can be counted on to vigorously defend the existing county land use plan against all pressures, including the pressure of the cities to expand their density into larger areas. Dunn and Wells have been faithful to protect existing homeowners against encroaching density. Their record in this one, overriding regard is long, loud and clear. Dunn and Wells will act like true conservatives: They will conserve what we have. What about the sheriff; what about tone; what about legal bills; what about disagreements between this paper and the commission? Think with me: Those issues, while significant, pale in comparison to the future development of this county. Dunn and Wells have a proven record in this most important local government issue. We can trust them to continue to conserve. Can we trust challengers Eric Maxwell, Sam Chapman and Jack Smith? I don’t know. And that’s the point. We just don’t know what they will do. All we have are their words. There might even be a stealth candidate or two among them, likely to rezone and replan our county’s future to our dismay. With Dunn and Wells, we have their records. And on this one overarching issue — Fayette’s future development — their record is very good. Maxwell et al have made a compelling case that the legal squabbles between the sheriff and the commission have cost money. They have pledged better “cooperation” with the cities in Fayette. But those are minor issues to most homeowners. And I have to stand with the homeowners. Law enforcement in Fayette has not declined in quality because of the lawsuits. The sheriff still does a fine job of running a fine department. The courts will eventually rule. But that outcome will not affect population density, traffic congestion, overcrowded classrooms and overall quality of life in a still-green and often rural county. As to cooperation with the cities, I contend that the commission represents a check and balance to cities that become annexation-hungry, sewer-expansion-prone and developer-friendly. I submit that if Maxwell, Chapman, Smith, etc., produce a get-along-go-along majority on the county commission, we homeowners will ultimately suffer from all their good will toward city expansion and project development. If the commission just goes along with hired bureaucrats to make land use decisions, they will have failed in their responsibility to the voters. It’s a good thing — no, a great thing — to have the county stand in the way of city government ambitions. Otherwise, you’ve got Fayetteville snaking its density all the way down Ga. Highway 85 to the Coweta line, Tyrone bulging all the way to the Fulton line and Peachtree City selling sewer to every developer who pulls out a checkbook. Consider Dunn and Wells as your protection against paving over paradise. Forgive them their other faults. In the race for the only purely Fayette seat in the General Assembly, I respect both men. But consider this: With two respectable conservatives running against each other, why change? Dan Lakly came through for us in a crucially important test: district voting. He rallied the House against installing voting by district against the will of just about everybody in Fayette. Lakly came through when it counted. That earns him my vote. School board, Post 4: Bob Todd makes a compelling case for electing him. His opponent has not made his case. School board, Post 5: Faith Hardnett has an enormous reservoir of good will in her favor, as well as years of good work in the trenches in our schools. Her opponent seemed to awake to the illegal student issue only when election time arrived. Hardnett gets my vote. login to post comments | Cal Beverly's blog |