Why people break vows

Father David Epps's picture

Recently, I wrote an article about the sacred vows that many ministers make at their ordination to the ministry or to the priesthood. I remarked that, all too often, those vows get broken.

Why do people break their vows? It is painfully obvious that people do, indeed, break their vows, even those that we deem “sacred vows.” Why is this? Why do clergy jettison their sacred promises made before an altar in the “presence of God and witnesses”?

Certainly, most clergy are honorable and keep the vows they have made; else all in the church world would be chaos. Yet, enough do betray their vows that much discord and pain is experienced.

After 35 years of ministry and working with congregations and clergy, I believe there are three primary reasons why men and women of God betray their vows:

1. Disappointment. A minister may become disillusioned about his/her congregation or the denominational structure or hierarchy. Bishops and other denominational officials are imperfect and those who are not prepared to accept the flaws are likely to lose heart.

It is a fact that God calls flawed people to do his work. It has always been so. Deacons, priests, pastors, and bishops can be just as small and petty as the next person. If clergy do not come to grips with this reality and accept it, disappointments may set in.

There may also be unrealized expectations that lead to disappointment. Perhaps a person feels that his career path will take a certain route but when it does not or it is slow in coming, resentment may set in and lead the person to violate his vows.

Certainly, church members by the millions leave churches each year, violating whatever membership vows they may have taken, because the pastor or board or congregation disappointed them. Clergy also leave because the congregation, the officials, or the denomination, in their mind, didn’t live up to perceived or inferred promises.

2. Ambition. A certain amount of ambition is a good thing. Jesus did not discourage people who wanted to be “great.” He did, however, teach that this was achieved by becoming a “servant of all.” Selfish ambition, however, is a diabolical motivation that drives people to do things that benefit themselves without thought or care of the harm done to others.

I knew a man who was continually critical of his bishop, calling him names behind his back, casting doubts upon his calling and abilities, and questioning every decision the man made. Shortly after he left the denomination in anger, he located a tiny denomination that made him a bishop.

Suddenly, all became clear. Apparently, the man believed that HE should be the bishop and, upon deserting his denomination, shopped around until he found someone to declare him such. In our communion we call this “purple shirt fever” (our bishops wear purple clergy shirts).

Selfish ambition and rebellion go hand in hand. When Benedict Arnold wasn’t revered by the Colonial Army as he thought he warranted, he switched sides hoping to find better treatment and greater respect from the British.

3. Pressure. Sometimes the pressure is from family or friends who feel that better treatment will be received elsewhere. “They just don’t appreciate you and your talents,” they may say. The temptation is to seek greener fields.

Friends will often persuade others to join them in some illicit adventure. “We’re unhappy in our church/denomination! You should be too! Come with us in our rebellion.” They don’t say that but it’s what they mean.

In the Iraqi prison scandal, someone, somewhere first came up with the idea to mistreat prisoners. Others were enlisted or convinced to participate in actions that landed many of them in a military stockade. Corrupt cops may attempt to influence other officers to go “on the take.” Financial pressure has tempted many a man to become a spy or a traitor. The promise of easy gain has tempted police officers to “look the other way” in communities both great and small. Pressure from friends, family, or even superiors can persuade otherwise honorable pastors to commit dishonorable acts.

While these are reasons some people betray their vows and break their promises, they are not excuses. Throughout history, both secular and sacred, vows and promises have been taken seriously.

One who makes a vow to give truthful testimony in a court proceeding and then fails to do so may be charged with a crime and incarcerated. Soldiers who betray their vows may be executed, police officers may be stripped of their responsibilities and fired or jailed, spouses may be divorced, and clergy who betray or violate their sacred vows may be defrocked or even excommunicated.

As human history demonstrates, a person known as a “Benedict Arnold” or a “Judas” is a person held in contempt by society.

Keeping one’s vows is a matter of honor, of integrity, of character. A person who keeps vows is known as a faithful individual. It is the vow-breaker whose character is suspect, his motives questioned, and his integrity doubted.

It is the keepers of their vows who may content themselves, knowing that they are honorable and faithful people.

login to post comments | Father David Epps's blog

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
PTC Guy's picture
Submitted by PTC Guy on Sat, 06/24/2006 - 2:01pm.

With respect, you make pronouncements but never answer questions.

Your vows are to your denomination. Not Christ, which a church is suppose to represent. Especially the pastor.

How dare I say that? Because of your own words.

All you speak of is denomination positions of power and authority. Vows to a denomination. Vows to other men.

Our vows should be to Christ as our authority. Not a denomination.

And that was why I asked you before about when someone presents a solid Biblical case your denominational doctrine is wrong, what do you do?

The answer is you back your denomination, not Christ. That is obvious from what you have said.

Vows are important. Which means to whom the vows are given in what order are the most important.

A pastor SHOULD make his vow to Christ, not a denomination. And any vow to a denomination SHOULD contain the clause 'as long my vow does not violate my vow to Christ.'

Since you make these posts here, why do you not feel any duty to respond to questions and challenges?

If you feel your vows and ordination make you superior and a maker of pronouncements and not an answerer of questions, then I tell you flatly you need to review your spiritual priorities.

You say vows are issues of faithfulness. I agree.

But I would add there is wisdom in to whom one makes their vows and wisdom in the taking care what those vows say and prioritize.

Paul is most adament, in Galatians, about the error of following men and their teachings over Christ and his. He calls it division, which should not exist.

-----------------------------
Keeping it real and to the core of the issue, not the peripherals.


bad_ptc's picture
Submitted by bad_ptc on Sat, 06/24/2006 - 2:32pm.

PTC Guy

Is there a thundersotrm over you house right about now?

Not criticizing, just asking.


PTC Guy's picture
Submitted by PTC Guy on Sat, 06/24/2006 - 3:21pm.

Bright and sunny.

And what makes you think God gets mad at those who follow the Bible over denominational doctrines?

Think about it. So many denominations all disagreeing with each other and all holding themselves above question. And so many pastors upholding their vows and denominational teaching over the Bible?

An example, other than Mr. Epps denomination:

You have some Baptist denominations that say taking a sip of beer is a sin. That the Bible says any alcohol is bad and sinful.

Yet, Christ drank wine, he changed water into wine and so on.

Question them on it and get their denominational doctrine cited, not the Bible. 'We Baptists believe' instead of the Bible says or shows.

And forget being a member if you refuse to uphold that doctrine. Not going to happen.

My point is what Christians are suppose to uphold, worship and follow over what many uphold, worship and follow.

Or denominations that teach salvation via works and abiding by THEIR doctrine. Yet the Bible teachs salvation by repentence via grace by faith in Christ's self-sacrifice on the cross.

Just food for thought in a day where the Bible no longer holds much value, truth or authority in the 'Christian' world. What and who is the final authority on spiritual truth for one who claims to follow Christ?

Absolutely no offense taken in the question.

-----------------------------
Keeping it real and to the core of the issue, not the peripherals.


bad_ptc's picture
Submitted by bad_ptc on Sat, 06/24/2006 - 4:00pm.

PTC Guy

I myself have had no affiliation with “organized” religion for many years now.

I for one don’t believe that I need to “led” anywhere, especially not to my savior. It is my belief that my savior is with me everywhere I go in my hart, mind, thought and deed. A blind man can find GOD just fine without anyone’s help. All they have to do is look in, not out.

I also don’t believe that one needs to be “led” to salvation. There are many paths that will get you there, you simply must chose the one that works for yourself.

I can and have debated organized religion with many from many different beliefs and it usually boils down to “if that’s what you believe than that’s good enough”.

Your example of, “You have some Baptist denominations that say taking a sip of beer is a sin. That the Bible says any alcohol is bad and sinful”, is a perfect example why “organized” religion doesn’t work for me. It was written by a man, NOT GOD. To my knowledge Jesus didn’t write a gospel, others did.

Then there the ones on TV that will “HEEEEEAL” you. As far as I’m concerned that should come on TV just before or after professional wrestling.

I do enjoy watching the carnage in the church parking lots just after mass lets out. I can’t help but sit and laugh at the thought of all those “saved ones” just sat through an hour of being saved and or led and now it’s the Indy 500 to get somewhere else other than church. They can’t keep the “Spirit” in them for 10 minuets never mind a whole week.

Please don’t be offended if anything I wrote offends you. That was never my intention.


PTC Guy's picture
Submitted by PTC Guy on Sat, 06/24/2006 - 4:25pm.

While I disagree with denominationalism, I do not accept there are many paths to God and salvation and being comfortable with any one is just fine with God.

It is simply logical the true God would give us a true avenue to him. And we can be guided to it if we so allow.

You would be welcome to come and discuss these things on the site in my profile. I believe you will find more there than any path will work and it being purely self based.

No. Christ did not personally write any Gospel. But most assuredly he embraced and endorsed the Old Testament, and no other, as being from God. And he annointed and appointed the Apostles to build the Church on the foundation he laid.

No. That is not Catholicism or any denominationally organized churches. It is the Body of Christ, the Church, manifest in individuals who should meet and work together.

It is a big topic of discussion. But simply in execution.

And there are tests and proofs to reveal who and what is real and who and what is not.

-----------------------------
Keeping it real and to the core of the issue, not the peripherals.


bad_ptc's picture
Submitted by bad_ptc on Sat, 06/24/2006 - 4:39pm.

Thank you for your offer to discuss/debate on your site. I love debate but I have to admit that when I debate religion, I do it badly.

The first rule of debate is to NEVER attack the person, attack the issue.

I have come to find that the topic in and of itself is held vary tightly by those that truly believe and my debating it with them takes on an odor of both arrogance and ignorance as I won’t be swayed in my ways. Therefore the debate usually becomes personnel nature and no longer has it’s desired intention.


PTC Guy's picture
Submitted by PTC Guy on Sat, 06/24/2006 - 4:49pm.

Well, as the site owner I can promise you that if you don't go personal the discussion will not go personal.

Go and read as a lurker. Then decide if you want to get involved.

But, you will find those that present historical, scientific and other reasons for what they believe.

And we do discuss other religions, atheism and such as well.

Admin and mods there do not care if you debate well. Only if they can find a point in what you say.

Up to you.

By the way, we are non-denominational for the most part. Facts mean more than anything else to us.

-----------------------------
Keeping it real and to the core of the issue, not the peripherals.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.