Candidate Maxwell, an attorney, deliberately deceives about legal fees

Tue, 06/13/2006 - 4:49pm
By: The Citizen

This letter addresses a totally deceptive political ad which appeared in the June 7, 2006, edition of this newspaper. The ad was from the Eric Maxwell campaign.

Normally I would be more diplomatic, but since this ad refers to lawsuits and Mr. Maxwell is an attorney and a judge in Peachtree City, I must conclude that the deception was intentional.

He refers to five legal cases the county has litigated or is still litigating. He implies that I initiated and lost all five cases. He further states I spent over $500,000 in fiscal year 2006 and lost all those cases in that same year.

I am listing the five cases as cited by Mr. Maxwell in this ad and will provide the facts:

1. Chairman Greg Dunn vs. Sheriff Johnson (drug money). This case was filed in 2004. Sheriff Johnson sued the Board of Commissioners. The case involved several issues, including drug money, but that issue gets most of the press. Drug money accountability is only a small part of the case. The county won a preliminary injunction against the sheriff. When the county sought a temporary injunction it was only partially granted. The case has not been to trial yet. To say that I (or the county) lost the case before it has even gone to trial is intentionally deceitful.

2. Chairman Greg Dunn vs. Sheriff Johnson (Marshal’s Office). This case was filed by the Board of Commissioners against Sheriff Johnson in 2003 for violating state law. He refused to incarcerate an offender apprehended by the Marshal’s Office. The sheriff had always done so previously. This time he refused without warning or adequate explanation. The county won this case in Superior Court. The sheriff appealed it to the Supreme Court of Georgia. The Supreme Court sent the case back to Superior Court because they felt the judge should have considered two statements he did not admit. That case must now go to trial. Again, the case has not been tried and Mr. Maxwell claims that I lost it. Again, intentional deception.

3. Chairman Greg Dunn vs. Fayetteville (annexation). This was a 2003 case. The case was filed by the Board of Commissioners against the mayor and City Council to prevent the annexation of a large portion of the Pavilion Shopping Center because it would create an “island” surrounded by the city of Fayetteville. To avoid making an “island” the city created a 10-foot wide strip connecting sections of the unincorporated county. This violates another section of the law. The judge agreed that it was a violation but allowed it anyway to allow the annexation. The county did lose this case but the rationale of the judge was, in a word, fascinating.

4. Chairman Greg Dunn vs. Tyrone (sewer with Fairburn). This was a 2001 case. The county sued both Tyrone and Fairburn to prevent Fairburn from bringing Fulton County’s sewer system to Tyrone across the county line. Fairburn was trying to build a 300-acre septic system on our northern border at the headwaters of Line Creek, one of our main water sources. The county objected in behalf of all county citizens, including those in Tyrone. Countless citizens of Tyrone are in an uproar over the exorbitant sewer rates and the increased density spurred by the sewer which now will have to be permanently provided by the Fulton County Sewer Department because Fairburn is not able to build the facility. Hundreds of Tyrone citizens now feel the county was right to oppose it. The county did lose this case.

5. Chairman Greg Dunn vs. Eric Maxwell (political signs). The proper name of this case is Eric K. Maxwell vs. Fayette County, Ga. Eric Maxwell sued the county. The county sign ordinance allowed only one sign on residential properties. He deliberately violated the ordinance. I say deliberately because he received a 10-day warning ticket from our Marshal’s Office. He refused to comply within the 10-day period and was then cited. In court his attorney argued he needed an injunction to allow at least eight signs on his property in order to support multiple candidates in the Peachtree City election. Mr. Maxwell can’t vote in Peachtree City. However, he won the injunction and then put up only one sign for one candidate in the Fayetteville election. He could have done that under the existing ordinance.

Even worse, Mr. Maxwell knew prior to suing that the county had been in the process of changing our ordinance for almost a year. He had nothing to gain but a political issue. He wasted taxpayers’ money to achieve it and now vows, if elected, to eliminate the Marshal’s Office which cited him. This case has not yet come up in court, so again nobody has won or lost. The county offered some time ago to settle the case as we now have a new ordinance and we do not wish to waste taxpayers’ money defending an ordinance which no longer exists. Mr. Maxwell has not yet accepted the county’s offer.

Fayette County lost two of the cases and three, including the one filed by Mr. Maxwell, are still pending, having not yet gone to trial.

Neither Greg Dunn nor the county spent $500,000 in FY 2006 on legal fees. We are still in FY 2006. He is probably referring to the $502,000 spent in FY 2005 but that includes every bit of legal expenses for the county in all our departments, not just a few court cases.

The vast majority of the fees are spent defending the land use plan, handling Workers’ Comp cases, formulating contracts, defending lawsuits against the sheriff’s office from the public, etc.

I believe this intentional deception is simply politically based, is unfair to the entire Board of Commissioners but most importantly it deliberately misinforms our citizens. Unlike Mr. Maxwell, Greg Dunn cannot and has not sued anyone. The entire five-member board must do so. I represent only one vote. In those cases where the county initiated a lawsuit, I believe we were right to do so. I believe most of our citizens would have done the same if they knew the facts in question.

Please check these cases for yourself. They are all public record and available to anyone who inquires. You can also visit www.ElectGregDunn.org or call me at 770-631-9630 for more information on the ad and other issues.

Greg Dunn, chairman
Fayette County Board of Commissioners
Fayetteville, Ga.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by Southside on Tue, 07/11/2006 - 6:51pm.

Am I the only one who has noticed, in a forum where your blog will dissapear within hours, a letter to the editor written a month ago remains the first one to appear on the letter to the editor link in font twice the size of all others? Anyone who has sent a letter since then has been moved to the bottom so that this letter remains the lead letter 4 weeks after it posted.

Not so suttle Cal. Message? Land use number one priority. Legal expenses, law enforcement, sixth commisioner, harmony, not significant to Cal.

Submitted by 30YearResident on Thu, 06/15/2006 - 8:16pm.

Mr Dunn,

Actually, you represent three votes on the commission because whatever you decide, you have two echos.

Also, if I'm not mistaken, Mr. Maxwell's suit is not "still pending" as you asserted, but in fact the county has offered a cash settlement that has been agreed.

Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Tue, 07/11/2006 - 7:04pm.

Dunn is indeed, Done. So is Linda. Peter will be fine as a lame duck. Herb will be chairman, unless you prefer Horgan (just kidding).

And there will be no echos - the new group will actually think and govern. What a refreshing change.


Submitted by lifeinptc on Wed, 06/14/2006 - 6:18am.

First of all Mr. Dunnn, most people won't dredge thru a letter that long, most people don't have the time. You appear to be saying it took you more than just one year to spend the $500,000. I can only speak for me but I think most people would say the point is not how long it took you to spend the money but what you spent it on.

If it was five law suits you lost then Maxwell made his point. Also I don't think the Sheriff sued you over the drug money. As I remember he was already in control of it and you sued to try and take over control. I think your comments on that issue were deceptive. You've helped me make up my mind.

Submitted by tonto707 on Wed, 06/14/2006 - 5:38am.

to publish a full accounting of all the money that has been spent on legal fees over the entire time these lawsuits have been going on, and be sure to include the money paid McNally and the sheriff's attorney.

Show the citizens of this county how real accountability is done.

Submitted by Fayetteresident on Tue, 06/13/2006 - 10:17pm.

"Chairman Dunn", I can't believe you actually put all of this in the paper! Do you really think that by printing this it makes you look better? On the contrary!!!

You even contradicted yourself by saying, "Mr. Maxwell knew prior to suing that the county had been in the process of changing our ordinance for almost a year"... Well why did you have the Marshals cite him with a TICKET then??? You FORCED him to take legal action... Any citizen would have been forced to do the same!

I THINK WE SHOULD GET RID OF THE MARSHALS too if all they have time to do is go around counting political signs! What a waste of taxpayer's money! Yes, the marshals are certified officers, but why do we need certified officers that are nothing more than mere "meter maids"?

Thank goodness the election is just around the corner. Eric Maxwell will have the good sense drop these trivial cases before they go to TRIAL and cost us more money!

tortugaocho's picture
Submitted by tortugaocho on Tue, 06/13/2006 - 9:52pm.

Greg Dunn worked in a large government bureacracy for too long. In justifying his lawsuites, he says "Oh well the half million in legal fees is for a lot of stuff."

Do you realize that every hour of every day of every week for the whole year (nights, holidays, weekends) we pay legal fees of $200 hour ???....That is obscene. The pendulum is swinging Maxwell's way.


Submitted by doc on Tue, 06/13/2006 - 9:02pm.

And then censoring any rebuttal?

Cal Beverly's picture
Submitted by Cal Beverly on Tue, 06/13/2006 - 10:28pm.

You are incorrect in your assertion that we are posting the above letter as if we wrote it.

Instead, the line that says "by" is an artifact of the computer code (which we did not write) that powers this Web site.

It shows who posted the item on the site, not who wrote it.

"The Citizen" is an all-in-one administrative sign-on for various staff members at the paper who actually upload and post the stories on our site.

Your clue should have come with the signature line, which states who wrote the letter.

"And then censoring any rebuttal?"

You may have noticed we did not censor you.

The only censoring that goes on on this Web site occurs when a registered user posts an obvious obscenity or calls somebody a libelous name like "Nazi" or the like.

The posting rules are contained in the FAQ, to be found in the lower left-hand rail of this page. Violate them and you are banned -- no questions and no appeals.

Your obedient ..... (And the "by" in this case accurately indicate who wrote this)

publisher
The Citizen
Fayetteville, Ga. 30214


Submitted by Sickened on Thu, 06/15/2006 - 3:47pm.

Okay, can I call them Fascists if not Nazi's? Because that is exactly what these anti-immigrant hate-mongers are.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.