To print undercover deputy’s wife’s name is wrong

Ben Nelms's picture

There are a million pieces of news out there and a million people to talk to when trying to report it. Like every other area of life, it’s pretty easy to get things wrong and it’s even easier to miss the innuendo or the intent of a particular speaker when assembling a story.

Occasionally I see something in print that makes me wonder what was going on in an interview, whether on the part of the interviewer, the one being interviewed, the editorial board reviewing the article, or all three. One of those less than ethical occasions occurred last week in the pages of the AJC.

The main thrust of the article was about the never-ending conversation about Sheriff Randall Johnson’s allegedly questionable expenditures, questionable at least to Fayette County Commission Chairman Greg Dunn and some in Fayette County government. But expenditures are not the issue.

On the AJC’s pages, and now worldwide on the Internet, was the name of Fayette County’s undercover drug task force supervisor. That’s not the end of the Earth since his name has been in the paper before.

The issue is that the agent’s wife was also named in the article. And that’s another matter altogether.

Stupid doesn’t even qualify for this one. It’s much worse. In this case, politics and/or editorial preference have potentially put a person’s life in danger.

The reason this is so stupid is that the agent’s wife, who is not an agent but is the person that shares the agent’s home, his family and his life, was blatantly included in the article.

For most law-abiding people this may seem to be no big deal. But put yourself in the place of an undercover cop who has spent a career arresting drug dealers, convicted felons and people who carry and use weapons as a part of their illegal trade. And you work in metro Atlanta, one of America’s premier drugs meccas.

Would you want these people to have the ability to find what I found so easily on the Internet? Would you want your wife’s name plastered all over the pages of a major newspaper and on the World Wide Web? Has anyone ever heard the term retribution?

Anyone who thinks this is overstepping or stretching the realm of possibility simply doesn’t know much about the realities of law enforcement, the threats sometimes made to officers and deadly consequences that sometimes accompany them.

Is it possible that the ones responsible for her name being in print just don’t see it that way? Is it possible they just don’t care?

The news is the news, they say. Don’t filter it. Just tell it. I believe that, too.

Yet I also believe that I must conduct myself in a manner that does not potentially put someone’s life in jeopardy.

Fayette County, the AJC or other news outlets will likely take issue with that statement. I don’t care.

Whether from a Fayette County source, the writer of the article or the paper’s editorial board, naming the name of a spouse of someone that works in undercover narcotics is stupid, arrogant, unethical and, I believe, immoral.

Granted, I hold no journalism degree nor have I ever taken a journalism class. My view of the fourth estate is one that says report the news as precisely as possible, do it in such a way that the innocent are not put in jeopardy, do everything possible to give a voice to the voiceless and don’t back off from a fight.

As for opinions, they go on the editorial page. Now you’ve heard mine.

login to post comments | Ben Nelms's blog

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by fayetteobservers on Wed, 06/07/2006 - 12:22pm.

Nelms is Right

It would have detracted nothing from the AJC story to remove the names. I don’t care. Frankly, I don’t care about the clothing. If Dunn wants to debate the issue, that’s fine. But for Dunn, the slimy county attorneys and the AJC to put the agent’s name and his wife’s name in the paper was reckless beyond belief.

You know what this guy does for a living---- for me and for you—— trying to motivate dealers to do business in any county other than Fayette. First you get a couple of cops to really dress down. Really dress down. They usually look very mangy, unkempt and nasty. They fit the part. The women do not look like prom queens. They set up a staging area with the backup. The undercover go in to a house on invitation, they make a sale. But its like Nicholas Cage said in the movie National Treasure, “The problem with fishing is that it usually doesn’t work out too well for the bait.” Now the sale goes down. And it has to be done right or some lawyer gets the dealer out. Then the backup unit busts the dealer, hopefully with no one getting shot. It is very difficult dangerous operation.

Think you got a tough job ? This is the only profession where cigarette smoking is a given. I may think I work hard and I whine about the commute but I’m not worried about anyone killing me in revenge.

We have awful choices for Commission. Maxwell and Chapman who will bulldoze and pave the county or Dunn and Wells who have now shown that they will do anything to compromise our law enforcement.

This one by Dunn was way over the top. Fire Dunn. Fire the lawyers. Restrain Maxwell’s agenda when he gets in there. Is the Sheriff’s department perfect ? Hell no. But you have to stand behind your guys and Dunn and backstabbed them on this one.

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 9:24pm.

Simply put...Greg Dunn and Company are corrupted and have resorted to desperate and shameless tactics in an attempt to maintain power and influence others. Peter's defense of Greg, Linda and McNally is also shameless. We are all for the defense of the Fayette County Land Use Plan. However, hiding behind it will not work. The difference between Democrats and Republicans is that when a Democrat does wrong he is protected. Whe a Republican is corrupt...well..let's say he becomes a part of history. You guys are history.


G35 Dude's picture
Submitted by G35 Dude on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 7:52pm.

If there isn't a law against outing an undercover officer and his family I think there should be.


Submitted by Fayetteresident on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 7:00pm.

Kevin Duffy, the author of the AJC article, has also been referred to as Fayette Co. Commission Chairman Greg Dunn's publicist! All of his information came directly from Dunn in an attempt to once again discredit our local law enforcement.

What makes me upset is that Greg Dunn has now taken his personal vendetta a step beyond the Sheriff and is now going after the officers themselves!

The invoice submitted by Capt. Mike Pruitt was for reimbursement of a jacket. The $180.00 jacket was part of his clothing allowance for the year. According to county records, this was the first jacket Pruitt submitted for reimbursement in his 25 years with the Sheriff's Department. Since his work is in an undercover capacity, he cannot wear the County issued jackets.

THE INVOICE was refused by County Finance because the invoice contained his wife's name. That issue could have been easily cleared up with the explanation that the Visa debit card used was hers. Pruitt never questioned the refusal of reimbursement and the issue was dropped... SO HE THOUGHT!

WHY WOULD our County Commission Chairman feel the need to pursue this to the point of trying to discredit one of our local officers? To what extent is Greg Dunn willing to go to further his vendetta?

I think this should be cause for dismissal from the County Chairman seat!

mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 7:40pm.

"outing" an undercover officer is treason at the national level.
What Dunn did is not actionable under federal laws, but serious to me. Let's "out" him in July.

Kevin is also guilty of something - not sure what, but more than his normal stupidity.
meow


Submitted by lifeinptc on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 5:59pm.

I read about this last night and it sickened me. I know the AJC is a liberal rag and probably would take pride in exposing undercover police but I think the police need to make sure this is not just some rogue reporter.

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 9:06pm.

The AJC shouldn't be an the issue here. Forget about them. I don't think any of us would expect anything less from them. The criminal act here is how Dunn and McNally have put the life of this deputy and his family in danger. Who knows what cases they may have jepordized. Has anyone thought that there might be other law enforcement personell who's lives may now be in danger as they continue their operations?

Greg Dunn & Company...You are shameless. I voted for you twice before and yes I have trashed on you because of your recent abuse of the power we had entrusted you with. Unfortunately we the taxpayers of Fayette County will pay the price. Your replacement will not be a benefit to the county. Nor will Linda's replacement. Dang it man. The only good thing is that maybe McNally and Klan will have to find a new job.

Man...with all the clowns in the races this year it just sickens me. I am what the politicians call a super voter. Never miss an election no matter how small. And I won't sit this one out. Sooo....instead of voting for the characters on the ballot I am going to write in Donald Duck. It is my duty to vote and so I will. What the hell is happening to our government and our country?

One more thing for The Natural, Janet, uh oh, and just askin. How in the hell do you defend this? Yeah...I'm mad and their ain't much I can do about it. Whew....I feel better now.


Submitted by uh oh on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 10:17pm.

Whew! That was a mouth full, even for a lion-
I agree with you on this issue. Greg Dunn has abused his power- but what do you think will be done to him about it? He will lose at the polls in July and probably move back north with his tail tucked between his legs- but what about the damage he can do between the election and Jan. 2007?
I agree- he should be made to walk the streets of Fayettedale wearing the infamous jacket- hopefully an easy target for the druggies!

uh oh!

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Wed, 06/07/2006 - 12:13pm.

Thought you were one of the Janets.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.