PTC Manager charged with DUI; will remain in office

Mon, 06/05/2006 - 1:25pm
By: John Munford

Peachtree City Manager Bernie McMullen was arrested for DUI Saturday night outside the city’s amphitheater while driving his golf cart, according to a police report on the incident.

Peachtree City Mayor Harold Logsdon plans to assume direct supervision of the police department, pending council approval, but McMullen has not been removed from his position, the mayor said in a statement.

According to the police report, McMullen was charged with DUI, possession of an open container of alcohol and possession of alcohol in a park, the last of which is a city ordinance. McMullen refused to take the breath test police sought, although he registered a .104 on a preliminary breath test, the report said.

Under Georgia law, anyone who registers .08 or more blood alcohol content on a breath or blood test is considered “under the influence.” The initial reading was likely taken with a portable breath alcohol sensor, but a desktop machine is used to record official results.

The police report also indicated that McMullen had a glass of wine in his possession at the time of the incident, which was at the conclusion of a concert featuring the Temptations.
McMullen, of Panstone Drive, Peachtree City, was taken to the Fayette County Jail where he was released on bond Sunday, officials said.

The City Council met Sunday at 6 p.m. in an emergency meeting — almost all of which was in executive (closed) session — and judging by the timing of the meeting they likely discussed the incident. Another indicator they might have been discussing McMullen’s arrest was that he was not present at the meeting, which is a fairly rare occasion.

Georgia law allows public agencies such as the City Council to meet in closed session to “discuss or deliberate” the disciplinary action or dismissal of an employee. But the same law also requires Council to hold the meeting in the open “when receiving evidence or hearing argument on charges filed to determine disciplinary action or dismissal of a public officer or employee.”

Council adjourned the meeting without taking any vote or releasing any information on the topic of the discussion. City Attorney Ted Meeker was present to advise council during the meeting.

“The council members and I were aware of this unfortunate incident and have discussed it,” Logsdon said in a prepared statement released Monday afternoon. “Bernie has always performed his duties as City Manager in an exemplary manner. He has our full support and will continue managing the day-to-day operations of the city, with one exception. Pending Council approval, I will assume direct supervision of the police department as we continue through the budget process and until the case has been adjudicated.”

Logsdon added that the court case will go through the Fayette County State Court rather than through the city’s municipal court.

The police report lists the number-three ranking officer at the police department, Capt. Stan Pye, as the complainant. The second-ranking officer, Maj. Mike DuPree, was listed as a witness, though the reporting officer was Sgt. Brad Williams.
This is not uncommon as it is typical for Peachtree City officers to work security for the amphitheater when concerts are held there.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by Lawdawg on Thu, 06/08/2006 - 8:07am.

None of the public policy concerns behind the DUI statutes are present when talking about DUIs given to golf cart drivers. Spare me the "you can die" comments. Yes you can, should golf carts have mandatory seatbelts and child seats? Should the paths have speed limits? As for the Peachtree City police, my observation is that they are polite and knowledgable but they do not seem to use common sense when it comes to using their discretion on when to press charges. They seem to just follow the book and that is not always the best path. Does anyone think this guy was the same sort of public danger that a guy behind the wheel of a truck would be? One final point, read that open container ordinance. It is so broad that the boy scout troop picking up old empty beer bottles on the side of the road is violating it. Should they get tickets? After all, as one commenter said, the law is the law.

Submitted by dopplerobserver on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 3:06pm.

There must be 20,000 "understandings" around the country concerning whether the police stop or arrest people driving away from parties at country clubs, bars, amphitheaters, poker games, police balls, and of course the PTC town bar, "Longhorn." The drinking of alcohol to make a person better able to do his job during working hours is acceptable in the US. If it weren't, we simply wouldn't have enough jails to hold them. In all liklihood the police force itself has several on the force who practice such "relaxations." Occasionally, even the town teenagers will be given tickets when McIntosh High lets out each day--not too many though, or the static will be enormous. I am simply intrigued by this occurence and all of the other drinkers, wanting to justify him, who are saying, generally, "OK he drank, got caught, and should get a ticket. Forget it. He does his job". The very worst thing that can come out of this is that the hit was ordered by police officials for some personal reason. That would require many firings, in my opinion.

Submitted by Mia on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 2:01pm.

For the life of me, I cannot understand how anybody can justify a person driving anything, be it a golf cart, motorcycle or an 18-wheeler drunk! .10 is legally drunk. A city manager, who does represent the city at ALL times, should know better. How dare people say it is OK because everyone else does it. If it was OK, it would not be against the law. And to refuse a breath test is in all reality admitting to driving drunk. If he had not been drinking, then there would be no reason to refuse the test, plain and simple. Here we try to teach our children what is right and wrong, and just because someone else does it and gets away with it does not make it right. Who cares if he is City Manager, Mayor or the President of the United States, you still have to obey the laws and pay the consequences. IS ANYONE DENYING HE WAS DRIVING WITH A GLASS OF WINE, HAD WINE IN A PUBLIC PLACE, AND BLEW A .10??? That is all that should matter in this case. I dont think he should lose his job over it, but I do think he should legally pay the consequences. I will get off my soap-box now. Smiling

Submitted by RubyBegonia on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 9:27am.

We have season tickets to concerts at the Fred, have been going for a few years. There are plenty of people drinking alcohol during the entire concert then leaving, sometimes barely walking, to get in their golf carts and go home when the concert ends. Yes, PTC police officers are always there, but we have never seen an officer approach any one. The officers are usually directing traffic or walking around. As far as containers in the park.....we have seen people at the picnic tables in the park drinking alcohol and eating before the concert begins so many times I can not count!

We do not know Mr. McMullen, just read this article and was very surprised to hear that some one was actually arrested leaving the amphitheater in a golf cart with a glass of wine. I guess there weren't enough officers on duty to arrest the many others driving their golf carts with open containers. Yes, I read Mr. McMullen's alcohol level.........PTC police obviously have radar vision to detect a glass of wine on a golf cart late at night with many hundreds of people, golf carts, and cars all trying to leave at the same time.

Submitted by RubyBegonia on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 2:39pm.

I am not making exuses for Mr. McMullen, just stating my opinion, since I attend the concerts on a regular basis. Refusing to take an additional breath analyzer is Mr. McMullen's right. If Willie B, God rest his soul, had been stopped the same night, we would not be reading and commenting about it here.

A practical consideration is that by the time the police officer requests a sample of your breath or blood you are already under arrest. Even if you pass the test you will go to jail. After all the police will not "un-arrest" you. Instead, the State will say that because the test was taken some time after the time of driving your alcohol concentration at the time of driving was higher than at the time of the test and that you have simply had time to "sober up." The State will also argue that even if your alcohol concentration was not above the legal limit, you had lost the normal use of your mental and physical faculties as the result of alcohol consumption.

I agree with the poster who suggested a designated driver. Great advice to follow.

fancypants's picture
Submitted by fancypants on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 10:14am.

I'm certain he was "hand" picked for his offense, but if that was because officers recognized him, somebody complained to them about him, or if it was because the chief asked them to keep an eye on him, nobody will probably ever know for sure.

In any case, he DID break the law, plain and simple. Nobody forced alcohol down his throat, nobody held a gun to his head forcing him on his golf cart. All the bloggers crying foul now, are probably the same people who get all huffy and puffy if they get pulled over for speeding on 285/85/75: "Why are you pulling me over? Everybody else is doing it, too!"

Especially as a public official in a fairly high profile job in this city, he did know better and should have held himself to a higher standard!

According to the chart listed earlier, he had at least five drinks, that's about 4 too many to still be driving in my book.

If he was at the concert in any official capacity, he should loose his job. If he wasn't, let him keep his job and get over it. Plain and simple.


Richard Hobbs's picture
Submitted by Richard Hobbs on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 10:17pm.

This Chart is the number of drinks one must have to consume at a weight over a very short period of time. Understanding that the levels will be less, if drank over many hours.

Number of beers/glasses of wine/hard shots
Weight----1-----2----3----4-----5----6----7----8----9----10--

100 lb. .038 .075 .113 .150 .188 .225 .263 .300 .338 .375
110 lb. .034 .066 .103 .137 .172 .207 .241 .275 .309 .344
120 lb. .031 .063 .094 .125 .156 .188 .219 .250 .281 .313
130 lb. .029 .058 .087 .116 .145 .174 .203 .232 .261 .290
140 lb. .027 .054 .080 .107 .134 .161 .188 .214 .241 .268
150 lb. .025 .050 .075 .100 .125 .151 .176 .201 .226 .251
160 lb. .023 .047 .070 .094 .117 .141 .164 .188 .211 .234
170 lb. .022 .045 .066 .088 .110 .132 .155 .178 .200 .221
180 lb. .021 .042 .063 .083 .104 .125 .146 .167 .188 .208
190 lb. .020 .040 .059 .079 .099 .119 .138 .158 .179 .198
200 lb. .019 .038 .056 .075 .094 .113 .131 .150 .169 .188
210 lb. .018 .036 .053 .071 .090 .107 .125 .143 .161 .179
220 lb. .017 .034 .051 .068 .085 .102 .119 .136 .153 .170
230 lb. .016 .032 .049 .065 .081 .098 .115 .130 .147 .163
240 lb. .016 .031 .047 .063 .078 .094 .109 .125 .141 .156

I don't do criminal defense work, but I do keep this chart handy so I can be ready when I'm suing someone who has drunk and driven and injured a client.

FWIW


Submitted by DIXIECRAZY73 on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 10:43pm.

No Matter how you look at it. Drinking and driving is against the law. For every alcholic drink you drink and get behind any vehicle you are putting your self and others at risk. There are LAWS in this country and some seem to think NO matter who you are you don't have to obey them! It is a shame the PD can't sit at all Bars and Restaurants and arrest those who choose to get behind the wheel of any vehicle, Golf Cart or whatever. Yes, there was drinking at the Ampitheatre, but hopefully most of them were SMART enough to have designated drivers. My theory is STUPID SHOULD HURT. We don't expect our higher ups to disobey the law. Have any of you thought that the PD just happened to know this man, duh, and just happened to talk to or recognized him and noticed he had an open container? Lets congratulate the PD for standing there ground. Wouldn't it be worse if they just ignored the facts?

Submitted by bladderq on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 9:26pm.

Please as the president of the above (Drunks Against Madd Mothers) join us in our quest to wrestle some semblance of justice to the system of retribution in place now. Having seen this man a .01 would not be considered "drunk". The joke of all this is that with all the drinkin' & golf cart drivin' there has only been 1 golf cart death in PTC & alcohol wasn't involved. If he was trying to rein-in the police..more power to him. I urge all of you to spend time in Wed Court, esp. women being of smaller size. All should take note of the cases the PTC PD are bringing.

Submitted by skyspy on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 9:41pm.

Can't you drunk and desparate PTC housewives just stay at home and drink? It wasn't .01 it was .10 big difference, even if you have two martinis with breakfast everyday. Even your liver would have a hard time keeping up with that. Snap out of it!!

Submitted by skyspy on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 9:13pm.

People if you have to drink that much,.....STAY HOME. Have one or two drinks in public them go home and drink the rest. For those of you who think a golf cart is not as dangerous as a car here are some examples... The reason you get a DUI now for driving a golf cart under the influence is because of a Delta pilot who wraped his cart around a tree and they had to use the Jaw of life to get him out. That is when the officals in charge at the time decided to take extreme measures to get things under control. Another example is a neighbor who is paralized from the waist down because of a teen driving too fast who hit her.

As for the rift between the police chief and the city manager I have never seen any evidence of that. In the paper or otherwise. PTC police are very consistent....they are always very tough. The only time I see them be lenient is with the bad kids. One particular kid who has a special affinity for breaking and entering(when the people are home) took a swing at an officer recently, and the way it was handled I was expecting that officer to pull milk and cookies out of his squad car. I was praying for a Chicago cop who would have thrown that little punk face down in the dirt and broke some teeth while he was at it. This officer showed great restaint and tried to calm him down,(I appreciate his patience,but I still wanted that Chicago cop).
Bottom line is our guys are fair, too much in some cases.
Harold as for the budget, we need at least ten new officers to get this city somewhere in the vicinity of control. You have already broke your campaign promise, so raise our taxes and make it happen.

Submitted by allend on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 9:17pm.

Leaving us with the opinion you shouldn't drink when you post either.

Submitted by Oh Boy on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 7:36pm.

I don't dispute other's opinions, and valid points have been raised - BUT....

Why should he be treated any differently than any other citizen. I'm pretty sure that there are many other people that have been charged with DUI golf cart and open cointainer. Why does anything other than the fact that he violated the law matter? I agree with you that this is a personal matter, and I agree that he is innocent until proven guilty...but really...if he violated the law, he violated the law. I for one am glad to see that citations and arrests are distributed evenly amongst those of us who are average, and those of us who hold a public office/job.

Submitted by oldsimon on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 9:09pm.

he WAS treated differently because Murray is out to get him. While dozens of other golf carts with tipsy drivers passed on by, they turned a blind eye to the others. Murray used to bully the former City Manager, but this one is all business and Murray cannot scare him. So he is going to get him another way. Murray needs to go. His gestapo tactics are becoming alarming. .10 is not falling down drunk. It did used to be borderline before the laws were stiffened (no pun intended). After all he was not driving a SUV. He was not even out of the park. How fast can a golf cart go?

Submitted by flygirl on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 4:39am.

It doesn't matter that he wasn't OUT of the park. He was OUT of the ampitheater, obviously if he was on his golf cart. Who does he think he IS being so bold to drive his golf cart with a wine glass in his hand? I MEAN COME ON.. Thats ASKING for trouble. I guess he thought maybe he could get away with it since he IS the city manager. BUSTED!! and well deserved.

Submitted by skyspy on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 9:21pm.

Without a seat belt it is enough to paralyse people or worse. If you donl't believe me go and sit behind Morillion Hills on the cart path and watch.... if you dare. Also duck when you hear the gun fire or fire works that sound like a 22. You don't want to be in the line of fire. Go on I double dare you to sit back there between 6:30 and 9:00pm every night go on... be a man.......do it.

Submitted by Honestly on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 7:43pm.

If he was targeted because of who he was that is entrapment. This is the man who approves their budget. It almost makes me think they should have called in the State Patrol to deal with whatever disturbance he was making; which by the way we have heard nothing of any problem he was causing.

Voice of Fayette Future's picture
Submitted by Voice of Fayett... on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 9:19pm.

Was this a road block or just this one guy ? I could not tell.


Basmati's picture
Submitted by Basmati on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 9:47pm.

I'm sorry, but the thought of a sobriety checkpoint roadblock at the Amphitheater just cracks me up. They'd nail roughly 50% of the cart riders for DUI (CUI?) minimum, and many of them some of the "elite" families of PTC who would run good Chief Murray out of town on a rail once they sobered up and bonded out the next day. Not to mention one good night of busts would prolly send the Amphitheater's season ticket renewals into a death spiral.

Peachtree City residents should be very happy that Chief Murray has his "Raiders" focusing on improving their abilities to imitate 14 year old girls in adult Internet chat rooms rather than cutting down on alcohol related golf cart driving.

The real test will be a year or two down the road when our ambitious Chief Murray parlays his 15 minutes of fame as The Small Town Police Chief Who Nabbed More Pedophiles Than Interpol™ into the chiefdom of some medium-sized city and is replaced by someone who will put more emphasis on traditional community policing.


Submitted by oldsimon on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 9:26pm.

They were waiting for him and him alone and nabbed him just as he was leaving the concert. He was still on the premises. No one else was pulled over, either. POLICE POWER. Took him to jail and locked him up.

Submitted by skyspy on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 8:33pm.

Everyone knows PTC police are rabid dogs. If you even think about breaking the law they are all over you. It is refreshing to see that they don't play favorites. Except for the teenagers...they always seem to let them off way to easy. If anyone had a responsibility to know our ordinances it was this guy. Has anyone ever recieved a warning about anyting from PTC police?....Ever? I did't think so. They are always very polite, but you will never get off with just a warning.

Submitted by flygirl on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 4:41am.

or should i say "WHINE"

cogitoergofay's picture
Submitted by cogitoergofay on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 4:35am.

If not then this is an interesting case. As the one poster suggested, if there was a road block it would have the effect of reducing future ticket sales. There is extensive drinking and driving. Why did the previous city manager get a pass on his ? McMullen likely had 3 glasses of wine. How many others at the show (or coming off the golf course) are like that.


Submitted by Oh Boy on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 7:52pm.

I don't believe this fits the definition of entrapment...but I could be wrong. I don't think the police encouraged him to drink and get in the golf cart, and we all have choices as to drink and drive. Regardless of whether you agree with the law or not, you still have to abide by it or suffer the consequences. The Georgia courts through case law and statutory law have decided that a golf cart is a motor vehicle, and regardless of my agreement with it, it's the law. I expect to get a ticket if I choose to speed, and I expect to get a ticket if I run a redlight. Eveyone who has alcohol in a park, has an open cointainer in a motor vehicle, and everyone who drives drunk should expect to get a ticket or be arrested. I'm sure all of the facts will come to light as this plays itself out.

Submitted by Harvey on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 7:04pm.

Whatever the deal is, someone made a smart decision in sending this to State Court. I'm sure the city court would have been fair but sending it to State Court goes much further in helping it pass the smell test.

Advantage to defendant; If the circumstances did not warrant police stopping the golf cart, Judge Sams won't let it fly. Politics will not influence him.

Disadvantage to defendant; If the circumstances are there and the cops were right, a bad day in court, Judge Sams will lower the boom.

Submitted by loveptc on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 6:58pm.

Why does his job come into play? Driving while drinking is wrong, but to consider firing him? This is a mistake he made in his personal life, how does it effect what his postion is with the city?
And remeber... innocent till proven guilty!
P.S.- Cal, give me someway to spell check!

Submitted by allend on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 7:09pm.

We're sitting here at the end of our work day just making comments on what we read and we have jerks like Highgreen giving us a hard time on grammar and spelling. I say we let Cal not sweat it and let Highgreen just tweak out all he wants on our mistakes.

CarpeDieminPTC's picture
Submitted by CarpeDieminPTC on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 6:05pm.

1. The city manager and the Police Chief had apparently had a rather difficult relationship of late?
2. The Budget for the police was being picked apart and the Chief didn't care for it one bit?
3. The police at the Concert knew to specifically watch this one patron for the opportunity to arrest him should he do anything out of line?

DUI laws are serious, no doubt, but they were originally created to stop drunks from Driving 2500 pound vehicles at 70 mph on the public roads. I suspect that a DUI for driving a Golf Cart should coincide with the potential danger realized from that violation. Which in my humble opinion is not the same as for driving a car. (The legal limit is much stiffer for drivers of tractor trailers because of the increased risk, I assume.)

For all of his life, he will be forced to have a DUI on his record for something that arguably is not what the orginal intent of our DUI laws were all about, and if they were, then there needs to be something else charged for this behavoir.

If the Police Chief specifically used his authority and power to nab an adversary, then I would suggest this was far worse than driving at .10 on a golf cart. The police powers of our men with guns should always be equally used, and never to promote a personal agenda.

If of course this is true.. . . now if a certain newspaper's intrepid reporters were to do some "investigating", then we would all know.


Submitted by snark on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 6:24pm.

.10 is seriously drunk. It's not just a little tipsy.

If he was really wheeling around in a golf cart that drunk, political excuses are just that - excuses.

Submitted by Glomar on Thu, 06/08/2006 - 9:55am.

All you non-lawyers and non-law enforcement officers don't realize the injustice of posting the results from a preliminary alcohol screening. The report indicates that he had an open container. Anyone that knows anything about DUI law and these devices knows that you get a high faulty reading if someone has been drinking right before testing. Indeed, tests have shown that Listerine will show a reading that high if used immediately before taking a test. That is why the admissible test is the intoxilizer 5000 and the test subject must be observed not drinking for 20 minutes before being given the test. Despite the fact that it is stupid to give DUIs for golf carts (we allow 12 year old 6th graders drive them), he is innocent until proven guilty.

Basmati's picture
Submitted by Basmati on Thu, 06/08/2006 - 10:18am.

These "field tests" are not generally admissable in a court of law, or so I've been told.

I remember attending a Georgia football game in Athens a few years back. In the corner of the Varsity parking lot the Clarke County police had a "test your blood alcohol here" table set up.

I'd just finished my very first beer of the day, and was curious. So, getting tested about two minutes after finishing my beer (washing my mouth out with water first, as directed by the helpful police officer), I blew an incredible .21 on the field unit.


Submitted by Honestly on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 6:41pm.

.10 is not that seriously drunk. It used to be borderline until the limits got stiffer. I want to hear the nuts and bolts of what happened. Did he do something crazy or did they single him out for who he was? That's what is missing in this story. When I saw the headline I thought I would hear what he did to get the Police's attention. Where is that?

Submitted by snark on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 6:56pm.

It is seriously drunk and I know whereof I speak. I don't know any of these people involved and I have no dog in this fight, but my proposed answer to this -

Did he do something crazy

would be "Of course not - unless there were pedestrians or other golf carts around or he had passengers in his golf cart while he was driving around with enough alcohol in his system to blow a .10."

Submitted by allend on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 5:26pm.

I'm not sure everyone knows you can be charged with DUI on a golf cart. I guess it's because of all those violent golf cart head on collisions.

I guess the city manager should know though. I can't help feeling a little sorry for the guy. Hope this wasn't political.

Submitted by Sailon on Thu, 06/08/2006 - 10:45am.

The test was taken because he had an open drink on a golf cart if I understand the thing. We seem to be trying to put ourself in the town manager's place and explaining away some of it, and not mentioning the rest---something like the current Bush administration tries to do. Refusing to take a required breathilizer test is a no-no for almost anybody. If he was arrested premeditatively what with many police wheels just hjappening to be there, then all are guilty of something and should have to face the law. I can't imagine what would happen to an ordinary citizen who struck an officer as Cynthia McKinney did and nothing yet be done. This is what we may have here. Authorities can't be embarrased too much, can they, especially the police?

Submitted by veni vidi vici ... on Thu, 06/08/2006 - 12:30pm.

It appears the police singled him out. That is a BIG problem. What about all the others that had been drinking at the concert? He should not have been drinking that is true, but why did the police get him and only him? Are they going to stop everyone who has a partially used wine bottle in their picnic basket? They charged him with open container and drinking on city property. A few hundred were drinking on city property. This was selective enforcement at it's worse. Bet anyone else involved in the budget hearings with the Chief will think twice about crossing him. Chief is on a power trip.

Submitted by vox on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 5:57pm.

Why was this man singled out from all the other wine drinkers that were leaving the concert? They were waiting for him and nabbed him. Many, many folks have a little wine at the concerts. Are the police going start stopping them all? They have always been forgiving in the past. This stinks!! Heads should roll over this abuse of POLICE POWER.

Submitted by flygirl on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 4:45am.

maybe he was singled out b/c he had the balls to walk out of the ampitheater with a cup of wine in his hand?? HELLO OPEN CONTAINER!!!

Submitted by workin7joe on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 6:01am.

The PTC police have charged many with DUI on golf carts. They've done it for years. They've charged people with open containers. Folks like to gather at the docks to watch the sun set. Used to be an older couple who'd sit & sip a single glass of wine. Not any more!
City judge sentences golf cart DUI offenders to go to the DUI School. One case, as the judge hands down the sentence, the officer tries to tell the judge the driver can't go to the school (Riverdale). He can't drive, because he doesn't have a license. He can't get a license because - the driver is blind! Judge asks the defendant "If you are blind, how do you drive a golf cart?" Answer: "Very slowly".
When those concerts let out - it is crazy traffic. Lots of pedestrians walking in all different directions because cars and carts are parked everywhere. They are in the lot, along both sides of the road, over at the school. Cars and carts all trying to leave at the same time. There is a cop to help with the traffic at the exit by Fisher’s Luck. He’ll stop traffic for pedestrians trying to cross McIntosh trail to get to their cars and carts and to get vehicles out of the lot.
It’s after dark but with all those headlights, it’s not hard to see if a golf cart has occupants with a beer bottle or a wine glass. A plastic cup or a pop can wouldn’t draw so much attention.
The high concentration of cars, carts and pedestrians at the end of a concert doesn’t mix with high alcohol consumption. It’s scary to see some of those folks stumble around the moving traffic – even if they aren’t the driver.

mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 6:46pm.

Singled out big time! Murray plays for keeps. Logsdon now supervises him directly and that should be interesting.

Abuse of police power is not going to see the light of day on this one, vox. Instead this will become a vigilance issue --- i.e. the police doing their job and getting the perps under control, no matter who they may be.
meow


Submitted by flygirl on Mon, 06/05/2006 - 5:41pm.

My brother got a ticket 20 years ago for "failure to come to a complete stop at a stop sign" and had to pay a fine (on a golf cart).
Would you want a drunk driving a golf cart in your neighborhood?

Submitted by flip212 on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 10:59am.

While it allegedly appears that a law was broken, what ever happened to ‘Professional Courtesy”? Unless, the individual in question was being obnoxious to the arresting officer, why not show some professional courtesy?

Could we not have offered to give him a ride home? Would the arresting officer acted in the same manner if this individual was a “brother officer”? One would have to question!!

Come on PTC Police…lighten up a little and show some Professional Courtesy!

Submitted by flip212 on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 10:36pm.

Did you forget to answer my question deliberatley??

let me ask again...Would the arresting officer acted in the same manner if this individual was a “brother officer”?

ptctaxpayer's picture
Submitted by ptctaxpayer on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 3:11pm.

That's Right---PTC Police Should Crack Down on DUI's.....

Start with The Y-Knot Bar....Whoops, we can't do that now, can we....


Submitted by flip212 on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 10:42pm.

Then they better get a bigger jail to house everyone that attends a concert at the Fred!

Be real folks......Can anyone honestly believe that he was the only person that had been drinking that night? How many Police Officers attend the Fred? Let me guess...none of them drink.....RIGHT...

I have a bridge for sale in NYC....and the sky is falling....

HELLOOOOO...duh...

Submitted by Miss Dixie on Wed, 06/07/2006 - 11:01am.

I don't know Mr. McMullin, but anyone reading the paper can see this was a set up. I go to the concerts on a regular basis. I have never seen ANYONE pulled over for drinking, much less on a golf cart.
I would venture to guess at least 50% or more of the patrons are drinking some alcohol. So they charged him with drinking on city property, now are they going to charge everyone there drinking? Come on- this reeks. They were waiting for him. Could this have anything to do the the budget hearings they are currently going on in the city???? Looks like abuse of police power to me.

fatdaddy721's picture
Submitted by fatdaddy721 on Thu, 06/08/2006 - 1:26pm.

Since when did it become so wrong to go to a concert and have a drink or two, so now I am a low life because when myself and my wife get out without the kids we like to go to concerts and listen to music and have a few drinks. Now I am no better than a drunk homeless person. But look at it on the bright side atleast someone pointed out to me that myself and my wife are both alcoholics because we have a drink at a concert. I guess instead of posting on here I should try and figure out where the closest A.A meeting is.


Submitted by Glomar on Thu, 06/08/2006 - 1:13pm.

Yaught: I guess Jesus was a drunk homeless person. First miracle was turning the water into wine. Drank regularly with his disciples. Was often accused of being a drunk by zealots. Drank wine with his disciples at the last supper before he died on the cross for you and me. HAVING SEVERAL GLASSES OF WINE DOES NOT MAKE YOU A DRUNKEN ALCOHOLIC.

tortugaocho's picture
Submitted by tortugaocho on Wed, 06/07/2006 - 7:31pm.

So Bernie was drunk. Agreed. But why hasn't the law been enforced before now (cuz the Fred would bite the dust) and why was Bernie the only arrest on Saturday night ? Yaught sez "I quit going because of the morons that cant control their drug intake and made fools of themselves." I agree. These were substandard performers in wheelchairs attended by drunken white trash. Hey, Yaught, if you could see the sea of obvious drunkenness, don't you think the police couldn't too ? So only one DUI on Saturday night ?


Basmati's picture
Submitted by Basmati on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 3:32pm.

There's been a number of "wink, nudge" posts on this site referring to the "special" status of the Y-knot bar. For those of us who came late to the party, can you tell us why that is? I do know they contributed to Mayor Logsdon's campaign, but is that all? Or is this where the PTC police go after work to tie one on?

(I haven't been in the Y-Knot for years, ever since they discontinued live music)


mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 7:44pm.

Maybe you should stop chewing on the cat and visit Y-Knot's again. The have chicken strips that taste like cat and drinkers galore. Sure enough, it is only a matter of time before the police go after the patrons there. Lots of targets from the good ole boy group.
meow


Submitted by Harvey on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 9:03pm.

I mean lion. Is that cat shaved or wearing body armour or what?

Submitted by uh oh on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 10:23pm.

Isn't Harvey the name of Jimmy Stewart's "invisible rabbit"? I guess you & the lion have something in common- big imaginations?

uh oh

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 9:45pm.

Okay. If I must. He is a cross between a house cat and a lion. Our cat became impregnated by a lion while on a field trip to the zoo several years ago with my daughters kindergarten class. I suspect the cat was a stowaway in her backpack. Best we can figure is that kitty got a way and got something??? Well kitty died giving birth to "the lion" and...well you know the rest. We raised the lion to his manhood. The picture is deceiving as the cat....I mean the lion stands 4'4" tall in the picture you see. So he has a natural lion burr for his hair do. I know that it may be against county ordinances to keep a lion on the property but as big as he is we have taught him to bark like a German Shepherd. That guarantees the county marshalls and animal control won't come around to investigate. Hope that helps Harvey. There's more to the story but this particular thread is not about the cat.....I mean the lion but it is about not drinking and driving. I wonder if I would get pulled over if I let the lion be the designated driver?


odoylerules's picture
Submitted by odoylerules on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 12:22pm.

On the one hand, he was breaking the law, along with likely a hundred or so other people (at least). However, he was in a golf cart and while they can do some damage, it isn't as likely as if he were driving a cement truck out of the parking lot. As any public citizen will tell you, if we were caught in this situation, it wouldn't even be on anyone's radar but we would have been dealt with the same way - jailed, bailed out and embarassed with a court date in our future.

As for the police, they follow people from establishment that serve alcohol all the time and they just wait for something they can consider a slip up, from a missed turn signal to a not quite complete stop at a stop sign. If you had even one drink, you're done, because you will likely admit that you had a drink, they'll assume you had more than one and when the tests come, you'll be nervous and fail at least some of the tests.

If they want to get you, they'll get you. That goes for speeding too. Officers could be lenient in some cases but they aren't likely to be. Why should they be? A broken law is a broken law. And police in PTC will enforce all the broken laws they can - anything to break up the monotony, I guess.

Just take this whole situation as a good lesson. Have a designated driver, every time. Even if it means splitting the duty with your wife and you not drinking one night. It is one less thing to worry about and a DUI can screw your life up big time.

Thankfully, I've never had one and lord knows I could have had several in my life. I'm sure there are a lot of posters that can say the same thing. I'm just glad I never hurt anybody.


mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Tue, 06/06/2006 - 7:12pm.

Seems like a real good idea - or at least it did until you said "Even if it means splitting the duty with your wife and you not drinking one night" Other than that stupid idea - you are onto something.

Drink or drive - not both. Pick one.
meow


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.