PTC Mayor: bridge necessary for annexation

Thu, 06/01/2006 - 3:57pm
By: John Munford

If Peachtree City Mayor Harold Logsdon had his way, CSX would abandon its construction of what is essentially a parking area for trains adjacent to a residential area.

But Logsdon acknowledged Wednesday morning that he’s not likely to convince the railroad to abandon the project. The railroad has said it will close several rail crossings including one that the city planned to use to connect MacDuff Parkway to Ga. Highway 74 at the location of the former Comcast Cable building. That at-grade rail crossing would allow MacDuff to be extended to connect to Hwy. 74 where it currently intersects with the southern leg of Kedron Drive.

“That road has always been in our master plan on every document I’ve seen,” Logsdon said. “I’d like to keep it there.”

Logsdon hopes to at least get the company to screen the “rail siding,” which will allow a train of up to 110 cars long to get off the main tracks so it can be passed by other trains.

CSX officials told the city that trains could park on the siding for as short as a half hour up to 12 hours, said City Public Information Officer Betsy Tyler.

That has sparked safety concerns because of the use of railroad cars to carry hazardous chemicals. That also brings on security issues, and Logsdon noted that the siding is located on the only section of track that is not screened from view from Ga. Highway 74.

Logsdon wants the railroad to add landscaping to buffer the rail siding, and he also hopes the railroad will contribute towards the construction of a bridge over the railroad tracks so MacDuff Parkway can be extended to Hwy. 74. If built as proposed by the city’s traffic engineering consultants, MacDuff would link up with Hwy. 74 with the northern leg of Kedron Drive where a traffic light currently exists.

Logsdon said if the Comcast rail crossing is closed, the bridge will be necessary if the city is to consider annexing 787 acres for a subdivision with and a senior “self contained community” with 700 homes.

Logsdon hopes to convince the railroad to help pay for the bridge, along with the two developers seeking the annexation: Levitt and Sons and John Wieland Homes.

“I don’t think the City Council would vote for the annexation if we don’t have a way out of the West Village to 74,” Logsdon said.

While the city might be able to find a small way to chip in toward the bridge project, perhaps by doing some engineering work, the city would not be able to fund any significant portion of the cost.

“We’re not going to put a big chunk of a financial investment in a bridge,” Logsdon said.

Logsdon noted that Levitt and Sons is working with John Wieland Homes on their annexation proposals, and he sees that as a plus.

“They’re being very open with the public about what they’re doing,” Logsdon said. “There are no secrets.”

Between the two companies, they have secured all but 123 acres of land to be developed in the proposed “West Village” annexation, which includes land currently in the unincorporated county north of the city limits running up to the city limits of Tyrone.

“That senior development is going to be a plus for Peachtree City,” Logsdon said, noting that he visited a similar Levitt and Sons development in Canton, Ga.

Last week, Logsdon penned a letter to CSX officials about the city’s concerns regarding the rail siding last week but he has not heard back from the company.

In his letter, Logsdon not only cited the possible difficulty with hazardous chemicals, but also the safety problem with closing the Comcast Cable crossing, which would deny one access road in and out of the West Village. Logsdon noted that about 1,200 residents live in the West Village area and the proposed annexations would add another 2,500 residents potentially.

“Many residents are asking why the siding is not located elsewhere — in our industrial park, or along one of the many thousands of miles of agricultural land throughout the state,” Logsdon wrote.

At least if the rail siding is completed and the Comcast Cable crossing is closed, there could still be a benefit for the city, as trains might be able to travel through the area without blowing their whistles, Logsdon noted.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
puppycat's picture
Submitted by puppycat on Fri, 06/02/2006 - 8:39am.

Yes the convienience of a bridge or road for the West Willage neighborhoods would be nice but how about one needed out of necessity! If they are going to park trains that contain hazardous chemicals.....what happens if there is an "accident" and the neighborhoods (Centennial, Chadsworth, etc) have to evacuate? There is only one way in and one way out! Even on a good day, it can be a challenge! The bridge or road is needed and should not be a choice but a necessity. I am also puzzled as to why CSX is making all the decisions? I am new to the area but it just surprises that PTC with all of its other codes and restrictions has allowed this to take place. What bothers us most is that this city has had this Master Plan for years and suddenly CSX can come in and change this plan? All we need now is a can of spray paint and a good artist and we will look just like the other "train yards" in all the great cities!


Submitted by ElVee on Fri, 06/02/2006 - 9:42am.

Railroads are generally regulated at the federal level. The Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995 (ICCTA) and the Federal Rail Safety Act of 1970 (FRSA) generally exempt the railroads from local ordinances. Simply put, PTC doesn't have much of a say in the matter.

PTC Guy's picture
Submitted by PTC Guy on Fri, 06/02/2006 - 9:16am.

The Master Plan myth is a joke. What this supposed plan was 20 years ago, when we moved in, has no resemblence to what has happened in the intervening 20 years.

And please. There is more risk of a chemical dump from a moving train than a parked one. This is a non-agrument in reality.

Why puzzled on CSX making the decisions? They own the track and land. And it is insane to think or say every government agency on their path has to approve what they do. Nothing could ever get build or done if that was the case.

PTC cannot stop them from building anymore than they could stop the State or Feds from building or widening a highway.

Plant more hedges. They block the view quite nicely.

But I agree more access is needed to the West Village area. Anyone reading what I have said knows I have very strong opinions on that issue.

-----------------------------
Keeping it real and to the core of the issue, not the peripherals.


Submitted by Sailon on Fri, 06/02/2006 - 3:10pm.

Oh, come on! Do you work for the RR? Parked chemical RR cars are safer than running cars? It is kind of hard to blow up or cause to leak a running car, isn't it? These will be toys to our youth around here. I don't think our current administration in PTC or our developers gives a rat what the RR did, does, or will do, as long as the houses are already built, do you? The short thinkers of the developer days of PTC (80s and 90s) were either ignorant about their jobs as saviours of the people, or made some money on it, by creating the whole West side of town as it was done. Why was it done there? Ever try to buy the land, say, east of Robinson road, or along 74 North, where all that should have been. Wrong people owned it.

PTC Guy's picture
Submitted by PTC Guy on Fri, 06/02/2006 - 6:53pm.

No. I don't work for the RR.

When is the last time you heard of a chemical dump from a parked train? I cannot remember any.

Yep. I said before the teens and such would be playing on them. I believe I was the first to bring up that point, in fact.

Your missing the point, Highgreen. The Council has no authority to stop the RR from doing what they did.

And I agree about the 80s and 90s. Every time we turned around it we were asking outselves why a lot of things that were done were done.

-----------------------------
Keeping it real and to the core of the issue, not the peripherals.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.