OPINION: PTC Council is about to sell us down the sewer line

Tue, 05/30/2006 - 7:35pm
By: Cal Beverly

OPINION

By CAL BEVERLY
editor@TheCitizen.com

So the Peachtree City Water and Sewer Authority wants to act like a for-profit business and wholesale its sewage treatment — OUR sewage treatment — to out-of-county Senoia users who have yet to move in next door.

And so the Peachtree City mayor and council are moving toward a vote to approve that sewer deal, worth many millions to the Senoia city government and untold tens of millions to developers on the other side of Line Creek.

Here’s what makes me want to spit sewage into the face of every one of those Peachtree City bureaucrats and witless politicians about to sell us all down the sewer line:

Senoia will pay 88 cents a thousand gallons LESS than I do for the same thousand gallons of sewage to be treated at the Peachtree City plant.

I and thousands of you have been paying exorbitant sewer fees monthly for 20 years or more. Fees here were always higher than most neighboring jurisdictions — while the sewer plant was privately owned and later in the late 1990s when the city bought it with a $28 million-plus bond issue.

Is it not enough that the avaricious WASA people and the witless PTC Council will unleash a flood of high-density, not-well-planned development on our very border, whose thousands of yet-to-arrive vehicles will back up on Rockaway Road morning and evening and clog even the four-laned Ga. Highway 74?

But to add true insult to real injury, these sewerheads are going to sell our sewer system to Senoia for 88 cents a thousand gallons less than we pay, we who have been paying exorbitant sewer prices for decades.

You and I pay $4.38 in sewage fees for every thousand gallons of water that shows up on our water bills, while johnny-come-lately Senoia will waltz in at $3.50 for every thousand gallons that's actually pumped to the treatment plant. Is that right?

So do you want to continue paying 25 percent more for your sewer treatment while Senoia climbs on board at a bargain rate of 88 cents a thousand gallons less than you pay?

Do you want to continue paying for sewer service that you never use?

That’s your lawn sprinklers and car washing and backyard pools, every gallon of which you are charged as though it all goes through the city sewer lines.

But, in a great fraud being continued under the WASA and with the connivance of the Peachtree City Council, you are continuing to pay for sewer treatment that you never receive.

Do you suppose the new folks in Senoia will have to pay such an outrageous overcharge?

I doubt it.

If the PTC Council is going to break faith with the council of the late 1990s and with all the residents here at that time and undo that solemn public pledge never to extend the new city-owned sewer system outside city limit lines, then the least they could do would be to charge the new users the premium rates for the privilege of tying onto the city system.

But that’s not what the sewerheads have in mind for us unworthy Peachtree City sewer customers.

No, they intend for us docile Peachtree City folks to continue paying the premium sewer rates while they offer Wal-Mart sewer rates to all newcomers, whether in this county or not.

If you think that’s OK, then stay as quiet as you have been and make no waves.

But if you, like me, believe that the sewerheads are about to soak us in the sewer pond with continued high rates while becoming the sewer bargain basement for the benefit of developers who want to build for new Coweta residents yet to arrive, then let your local sewerhead council members know what you think at 7 p.m. this Thursday at Peachtree City Hall.

That’s if they let you speak at all under their new rules.

Don't be shy: Post online what you think of this sewer deal. Log in and post away.

CORRECTION: Thanks to a more math-minded poster than I, the above is now corrected to read "per thousand gallons" rather than "per gallon." The basic unit for which fees are charged is one thousand gallons.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by familyman on Wed, 05/31/2006 - 7:33am.

Cal,
As you are aware, the WASA meetings are open to the public. When was the last time you were at a meeting to ask questions and actually get some facts, rather than just toss out allegations. If you had gone to one of the monthly meetings you would know that in the last 14 years, PTC residents have experienced only one rate increase for their sewer service. Even with that modest increase, the average monthly bill for sewer service is in the bottom five for all of metro atlanta. As we review the rates that the citizens pay every two years, my information is accurate. Also, at this time there is no contract in place between WASA and the city of Senoia regarding how much they would pay for their sewer service. And, do you really care or are you just trying to fill people with the same hatred and contempt you seem to have for all government? Does is bother you that people who live in apartments or mobile homes pay a different rate than you, as a single family homeowner?
You are obviously in tune with the growth that is occuring in all of the areas bordering PTC and you are aware that the City of Senoia is experiencing rapid growth. Whether we provide sewer capacity to them or not, will not affect that growth. Senoia is going to continue to develop their residential areas, within the city limits, exactly the same as PTC has done for the last 20 years. Surely you can not be suggesting that PTC try to control the growth of our neighboring communities, simply because it is causing a burden on our roads.
You won't like this either because I am going to provide more actual facts. The last upgrade to the sewer system in PTC provided enough capacity for all of PTC. Allocations were made for every inch of residential and commercial land being developed, as well as every home and business being converted from septic to sewer service. In addition, we also took the possibility of the west village being annexed and developed at maximum density, into account. With all of that, plus Photocircuits still operating, we left a contingency of over 200,000 gallons per day. Currently, if everything were to stay the same, with the loss of Photocircuits and if we were to accept 500,000 per day from Senoia we would be left with over 400,000 gallons of excess capacity. Did you know that Photocircuits paid over $400,000 per year for their sewer service? The cost associated with treating that much waste do not decrease on a straight line. In other words the loss of $400,000 revenue may only account for a reduction in costs of $10,000-$20,000. So, what that means is that that revenue will have to made up by you, myself and the other citizens and business owners of the city.
Lastly, the Peachtree City Water and Sewerage Authority has absolutely no interest in whether the west village or any other area is annexed into the city. We are required to provide sewer service to all areas of the city. No employee or board member has any vested interest in how the city develops, which is precisely why the board of directors is appointed and not elected, to remove political motivations from the process. Providing sewer capacity to the city of Senoia is something that will benefit all of the citizens of PTC by allowing us to maintain the low rates that everyone is accustomed to. There is no gain for WASA as an entity.

Submitted by Annie-Caroline Fritz on Wed, 05/31/2006 - 9:23am.

You little people are entirely too selfish. Familman is right when he says "There is no gain for WASA as an entity." WASA doesn't gain--- its the fine leaders of our community that gave us so much that deserve a small recognition in exchange. Those are real heroes here.
You didn’t expect these farmland pastures to be undeveloped, did you? And why make Wal-Mart and Home Depot move to some other spot when they just “liked” Hwy 54 better ? After all, “we could get sued.” Goodness gracious, we had to cave in. And then we got all these nice apartments.

And isn’t it a bit ungrateful not wanting the developers to benefit from the sewer that they bought for our benefit and then magnanimously sold to us ? So they bought the sewer system for one dollar from the county and sold it to us for $24 million— but they made it so nice for us to use. The sewer system was such an adorable little "fixer upper". And all they wanted was the Tennis Center and a sump pump into the hotel motel tax. That outside counsel that called all of our fine community leaders who sacrificed so selflessly “crooks” was just a malcontent. And when the GBI said that more investigation was needed to determine if any crimes were committed, well that’s as good as an exoneration. Isn’t it ?

In this land of plenty, you peasants need to share. You need to be more openminded to good things like Section 8 Apartments, MARTA and cozy traffic jams like Gwinnett. And as for the criminals like the one in the Coventry subdivision garage, its our chance to show compassion.

Submitted by Sailon on Wed, 05/31/2006 - 8:24am.

I heard talk like this when the "Avenue" was proposed and how traffic would be just fine. Don't you get it? We don't want all this crap here! One in five people in the USA now work in government---paid by taxes---and we don't want or need any more. Another one in eight work in Banks and the like, and developers offices and real estate agents.

PTC Guy's picture
Submitted by PTC Guy on Wed, 05/31/2006 - 8:36am.

Yep. We were all stunned at that proposal there.

It will all be fine. We got a plan for the traffic. Blah blah blah.

Sounds like the statements on widening 54 will fix this and all the other issues.

Bottom line is the Good Ole Boy developer back system is in full swing again.

-----------------------------
Keeping it real and to the core of the issue, not the peripherals.


Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Wed, 05/31/2006 - 8:08am.

It doesn't take a genius to see what he's up to. No research, no facts, just blabber from him. I like the paper in general, but his rants are getting old.

fancypants's picture
Submitted by fancypants on Wed, 05/31/2006 - 7:55am.

Cal does what Cal does best, sling a bunch of mud, or sewage in this case and hope that some of it will stick. I realize he is the editor, but for crying out loud, I wish he would do more in-depth research before writing up his editorials.

To all of the The Citizen employees: Don't let your boss make you guys look foolish and proofread his articles!


PTC Guy's picture
Submitted by PTC Guy on Wed, 05/31/2006 - 7:50am.

You neglected to address two key points.

First, is Senoia paying a single bill to justify the volume rate? If not, and their are individual billings, how do you justify them getting a lower rate?

Second, when expansion is needed, in the future, will they also be billed at an increased rate to pay for it?

Yes, currently there is no such need. But in seeing so much short-sightedness in decision making is that going to be a financial time bomb?

-----------------------------
Keeping it real and to the core of the issue, not the peripherals.


Submitted by familyman on Wed, 05/31/2006 - 8:05am.

PTC Guy,
Nice questions. Yes, Senoia would pay a single bill. They would be responsible for collection from each of their users. In addition, Senoia would be responsible for all of the infrastructure associated with their system. If a spill were to occur from their system, it would be soley their responsibility.
The expansion that John Munford mentioned is some kind of "master plan" that EPD has concocted that will likely never come to fruition. In that plan, they envision PTC becoming a central facility to treat 20,000,000 gallons per day for the region. Of course, this would have to be approved by PTC to even be part of it. As I mentioned, the only way the existing sewer system will ever have to be expanded is if the city council decides to annex more and more of the outlying areas around the city.

PTC Guy's picture
Submitted by PTC Guy on Wed, 05/31/2006 - 8:28am.

I understand bulk rates.

I do foresee a lot of annexation. I do see the current Council biting into the that vision.

-----------------------------
Keeping it real and to the core of the issue, not the peripherals.


Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Wed, 05/31/2006 - 8:04am.

Is that yes, Senoia is paying the bill. We would be giving them a "bulk" rate.

PTC Guy's picture
Submitted by PTC Guy on Wed, 05/31/2006 - 8:31am.

Hey, Dawg.

So far the Council is going right down the path I predicted at the election.

So, I hope you see my concerns on their short-sightedness and developer orientation.

Good grief! They are still pursuing that stupid roundabout, like some kind of status symbol.

-----------------------------
Keeping it real and to the core of the issue, not the peripherals.


Submitted by dkinser on Tue, 05/30/2006 - 9:50pm.

Mr. Beverly,

First off, in the general sense of your opinion; yes I agree with you. It does not makes sense that Peachtree City residents pay higher costs than those residents of another city that lies soley within another county.

The fact that Senoia is supposed to lay the pipes and maintain them does reduce the costs, but I would like to see where WASA has confirmed their estimates and based upon what volume. But just because Senoia is prepared to do that does not mean you need to discount the system. Simply put, supply and demand. We have it, they are demanding it; make them pay.

Senoia will bleed off some of our capacity, and the day will come when WASA will need to add more capacity, supposedly 2011 - 2020. Everyone's rates will go up to pay for that, but Senoia residents will always pay less despite the fact that their burden is what will drive the necessity for higher capacity earlier than would be necessary should WASA not offer them the usage of the system. If this deal was denied, how long would it be before WASA asked for higher capacity, 2020 - 2025?

What happens when a sewage spill occurs in Senoia. It will be WASA that is hammered by the state and WASA will be paying the fines, or should I say, Peachtree City residents will pay the fines via higher costs for sewer. WASA will undoubtedly be receiving calls from Senoia complaining about sewer issues. Will WASA simply defer them to Senoia or are they planning on adding staff to take these calls.

If Senoia is looking to expand their own sewer system, then they should go for it and expand to cover the demands that they are now wanting to buy from Peachtree City plus projected growth for 15 - 20 years.

Bottom line, this proposal simply doesn't make sense. Not in a fiscal way and not in the long term. We Peachtree City residents will take it in the wallet for years to come over this.

Something doesn't smell right here and I don't think it is simply the sewer.

On another note Mr. Beverly, I personally hate to see you label WASA personnel or possibly the Peachtree City Council with names such as "sewerheads". Despite a disagreement or two with a couple of posters, I have always tried to keep this blog what it should be. Above board and informative. I realize I can't censor you, but I personally would like to see the name calling dropped.

Just my opinion.

Dana Kinser

Submitted by glassisfull on Tue, 05/30/2006 - 10:39pm.

Seems to me that Cal is once again slanting the story, must be a slow news week. The $4.38 per 1000 gallons of flow that current PTC residents pay probably includes the cost of the collection system (pipelines) AND the treatment plants. I would assume that Senoia's rate of $3.50 per 1000 gallons only covers the cost of the treatment plants since they will probably go straight to one of the the two plants that border Coweta county and not use any of the WASA pipelines. That is fair, pay for what you use. Charging Senoia more than this would be profiteering, which is what Cal is alleging and that is wrong for a public agency to do. Go ahead and don't sell the excess capacity to Senoia, see what happens to rates when the shortfall from the loss of Photocircuits continues. Why continue to pay for capacity you are not using? The infrastructure is there, why not sell it if you are not using it? Remember the current capacity is enough to serve the whole City through COMPLETE BUILD OUT, including those homes on septic tanks and every undeveloped parcel. Unless PTC is planning on annexing Brooks or other parts of Fayette county, why would you need more capacity? As far as sewer spills, Senoia has their own permit with the State, if they have a spill, they will get fined for it, not PTC. I agree with the Mr. Kinser's assessment of Cal's disparaging remarks, when you don't have a good argument fall back on name calling, nice...

PTC Guy's picture
Submitted by PTC Guy on Wed, 05/31/2006 - 7:53am.

Some good points.

But I don't like operating on maybes. Are your thoughts actually the reality?

I hope some one finds out.

But I still see issues here that smell.

-----------------------------
Keeping it real and to the core of the issue, not the peripherals.


PTC Guy's picture
Submitted by PTC Guy on Tue, 05/30/2006 - 10:01pm.

I think the problem is short term thinking.

An election promise to reduce or freeze taxes and fees, selling sewer capacity, collected Stormwater monies with no hirings to do work, backing developers without infrastructure plans and funding in place, a desire to absorb the Tennis Center debt and so on.

Add them all together and it smells big time of the Good Ole Boy money machine in full swing, for themselves.

I know Dana didn't say that. But that is what I feel is the underlying King in the Tower and tell the peasants only what they need to hear I see now and predicted at the election.

Something is very very wrong here. And worse, was very foreseeable.

-----------------------------
Keeping it real and to the core of the issue, not the peripherals.


Submitted by snark on Tue, 05/30/2006 - 8:28pm.

You and I pay $4.38 in sewage fees for every gallon of water that shows up on our water bills, while johnny-come-lately Senoia will waltz in at $3.50 for every gallon that's actually pumped to the treatment plant. Is that right?

So do you want to continue paying 25 percent more for your sewer treatment while Senoia climbs on board at a bargain rate of 88 cents a gallon less than you pay?

Where are these numbers coming from? I can't make sense of it.

And if the average person uses 70 gallons of water per day, are you saying the average Peachtree City water/sewage bill for a family of 2 is over $18,000 per month? What am I missing?

Cal Beverly's picture
Submitted by Cal Beverly on Tue, 05/30/2006 - 8:37pm.

I have corrected the above opinion to reflect the actual rate that is charged per one thousand gallons of sewage. John Munford's story following my opinion also contains the accurate math.

Thanks for your sharp eyes.

Cal Beverly
publisher
The Citizen
Fayetteville, Ga. 30214


Submitted by snark on Tue, 05/30/2006 - 8:39pm.

No problem. Feel free to delete the whole series of posts to save the folks the time "wading" through it.

Submitted by Sailon on Tue, 05/30/2006 - 8:06pm.

Why does the WASA want to do this? Or, is it really the PTC administration? I'm sorry, but I knew when the last election results were announced what we were in for as far as development was concerned. I felt sick about it but the majority did speak---albeit that many of those voted against something rather than for something, for which they were not aware. As has been said before, there are yet many millionaires to be made here, and many millionaires to be made multi-millionaires, and many multi-millionaires to be made grossly rich. We middle class do not count for much and wage earners lower than that account for nothing. Besides we need more government jobs here since we have no new industry as there is none to be had.

Richard Hobbs's picture
Submitted by Richard Hobbs on Tue, 05/30/2006 - 10:31pm.

Thanks Cal for keeping us apprised. Even though I pay no sewer fees, I question the need for why we want to encourage the flood of quarter acre homes so close to our borders. Each home will have 2.3 children, 2-3 cars and for every dozen or more homes we need another gas station, then super market, then more and more and more. What in the world is wrong with requiring homes to be built on acerage that can accomadate septics? Because developers make more profits when they can fill 100 acres with 300+ homes, rather than 40 homes.

Mr. Mayor, how does this benefit those of us who have invested in our own quality of life in PTC, or at least those of us who are not developers? Why are you interested in helping them? How does it help us?

I'm at a loss as to how this can be a good thing for PTC. What reasonable explanation can there be? I sure hope those that contributed to your campaign, don't benefit from this sell out too.


Submitted by glassisfull on Tue, 05/30/2006 - 10:53pm.

If something doesn't smell right, then it's probably your failing septic tank. All septic tanks eventually fail, especially in the clay soil found here in Georgia. Building wastewater treatment plants and the associated piping is the environmentally sound thing to do. When you lose a major sewer customer, find someone to take their place or spread the loss of revenue over your existing customers. Seems like selling the excess Photocircuits capacity to Senoia is the economically sound thing to do. It will keep sewer rates down and that is how it will help PTC residents.

Richard Hobbs's picture
Submitted by Richard Hobbs on Wed, 05/31/2006 - 8:25am.

Fayette County and Peachtree City have a quality of life that is far greater than any other area around this wonderful State. The reasons are that we have some controlled growth in the County and in the city we have very well planned growth-save that of the numbers of apartment complexes that have sprung up of late.

To now encourage another municipality to utilize our sewer so that they can grow faster than the land will allow them to grow is just short sighted. The only benefit would be to the developers. The limited amount of money saved by selling off the system is miniscule when compared to the additional congestion of traffic and businesses.

I remember when they built the pavillion in Fayetteville. Oh, that was going to help the tax digest for the citizens. No one mentioned that this one small square mile would increase our jail capacity several fold. No one thought that we would have more Fulton and Clayton cars parked in the lots than ever before. . . . no one thought, or did they.

Growth must be controlled, or if not, then in 20 years the Hwy 54/74 intersection will look like Morrow Industrial/Hwy 19/41. I can't wait till the first Pawn shop and Check cashing Store opens up.

Whats good for the developers isn't always good for the people. Lower sewer rates may mean we give up some of what makes this City so beautiful.

IMHO.

As to septic tanks, I may be wrong, but the last time I spoke with the County regarding Septics, they insisted that Septics were the most enviornmentally friendly way to go, at least for homeowners. Perhaps I was mislead.


Submitted by familyman on Wed, 05/31/2006 - 8:50am.

Richard,
I understand your point of view. I don't know how long you have lived here, but when I moved here in 1998 the city was much different. The areas where the Avenue and the WalMart/Home Depot are, were just farm land or vacant lots. There was no trafic problem at 54/74 and we could actually get out of Planterra on to 54 with just a stop sign. Here is the problem with your desire and that of Highgreen109, you can't stop the growth. Remember, the city council tried to go to court to stop the sale and development of the WalMart land and the city attorney found out that we had no basis or hope of preventing that development because the land was zoned, from the beginning as commercial. We have absolutely no hope of trying to control the growth of Senoia, Coweta county or any of land outside of our city limits. On the good side though, there is virtually no commercial land left in the city. There is plenty of O&I (office and industrial) but no commercial. I agree completely with you, in that I moved to the city because it was small and quiet and wish that it would have stayed the same.

Richard Hobbs's picture
Submitted by Richard Hobbs on Wed, 05/31/2006 - 10:42am.

I disagree entirely.
You mention the big boxes, well that land was pre-zoned with the original land use maps designed for this planned community. I suspect when it was originally zoned, big boxes weren't that popular or even thought of, but the land was planned ahead of time and sometimes foresight is limited.

As to controlling Senoia, no we can't control them per se. But to give them our sewer is to open the flood gates to 1/4 acre subdivision lots, to more businesses and more Home Depots and Walmarts on the south end of our community. Next thing you know we will look just like Jimmy Carter Blvd. (Which coincidentally is a great homage to him and his presidency. Filled with trashy stores, no way to turn around, nothing but concrete for miles and miles.)

So again, helping Seonia grow is not in our best interests period. If they do it on their own, so be it, but to help them merely to lower our sewer rates is plain stupid.


Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Wed, 05/31/2006 - 1:12pm.

Why help Senoia? I agree, unless I hear some very good arguments in favor of doing so, I will be against it. I'm willing to pay a higher sewer rate to hold off development in that area if we can. And yes, that will be the biggest argument to help them, we lost a HUGE customer, and if we don't add another, our rates will go up.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.