Council axes new PTC auto repair shop

Thu, 05/11/2006 - 4:08pm
By: John Munford

In a surprise move, the Peachtree City Council last Thursday voted against a plan to build a new auto repair shop for the public works department.

The current auto shop is not large enough for the city’s fire engines, and city mechanics have to work on them in the open, even in inclement weather, according to Public Works Director Tom Corbett. The city performs almost all maintenance on the fire engines in-house because of the quicker turnaround time necessary for emergency vehicles.

Councilwoman Cyndi Plunkett asked if staff had studied whether outsourcing the repairs would be cheaper in the long run than building the new auto shop. She was interested in how long it would take for the city to “break even” on the building costs by not sending the fire engines elsewhere.

That information was not available from staff.

The project is not dead, as Plunkett said she might change her vote if she could be provided with more information supporting the expense. Plunkett joined council members Judi-ann Rutherford and Stuart Kourajian in voting against the expenditure, with Mayor Harold Logsdon and Councilman Steve Boone voting in favor.

Rutherford said she has opposed this project from its inception and she didn’t plan to change her mind.

“It’s not money I want to spend,” Rutherford said. “I wasn’t willing to spend it two years ago and I’m not willing to do so now.”

Boone said he looked at the project differently.

“I call it a life safety issue if somebody’s out in the rain and cold, working to fix an engine,” Boone said.

Peachtree City’s mechanics are now certified to maintain the fire engines, but that hasn’t always been the case. One time, a fire engine was out for a week because it had to be sent back to South Carolina for service, said Assistant City Manager Colin Halterman.

City staff had planned to finance the $498,500 construction cost over a seven-year period instead of paying the full cost up front. That cost was the lowest of four bids the city received for the project.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by mattpretarius@y... on Tue, 05/16/2006 - 4:12pm.

Who were the 4 bidders?

Who was going to get the project?

secret squirrel's picture
Submitted by secret squirrel on Tue, 05/16/2006 - 12:40pm.

Good to see Mayor Logsdon and Councilman Boone doing what they said they would in their campaigns. There are so many ways PTC wastes taxpayer money- it's refreshing to see two politicians stand up for our community and the common sense expenditures we need. Outsourcing the repair work for our emergency vehicles is a dangerous game. Being without an engine for a week because it's in East Point or South Carolina is unacceptable. As a taxpayer, I'd like to think all our councilmembers could demonstrate the common sense of Steve Boone and Harold Logsdon. Once again, we are disappointed to see they do not. Thank you Steve and Harold.

I certainly hope Judi-Ann doesn't plan to "return to the well" for the same support she received from certain groups when/if she decides to run for re-election. She won't like the response many people would love to give her. Stuart and Cyndi are working themselves towards the same end.


Submitted by Joe Swanson on Tue, 05/16/2006 - 1:21pm.

The suggestion of buying a new fire maintenance facility for $500,000 upfront and a cost of millions over time is a boondoggle. Might it be that the proposed contractors are campaign supporters of Boone and Logsdon ?

Judi Ann Rutherford and Cindy Plunkett were absolutely right on rejecting this proposal. It is a needless waste of money.

It is silly, alarmist and childish to think that a fire engine will be out of commission for a week. Mechanics are regularly flown in to get the job done.

If Boone and Logsdon like the Fire Facility, they will love the
North Fayette Park.

fancypants's picture
Submitted by fancypants on Tue, 05/16/2006 - 2:57pm.

Might it be that Joe Swanson is full of {{{deleted}}}?

Don;t start throwing your verbal trash around here if you have nothing to back ip up with!

I happen to agree with both sides on this matter:

- I don't want a fire engine out for any time longer than absolutely necessary, lives depend on it's availbility.
- Outsourcing should have been quoted before submittal, that's just common sense. Shame on the city staff for not having that figure readily at hand!


mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Tue, 05/16/2006 - 6:33pm.

Don't fall for his nonsense, fancypants. He is around merely to stir up discontent so he can figure out which issue he could run for office on next time.
meow


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.