Dunn: Paper should report facts; Wells deserves public apology

Tue, 05/02/2006 - 4:13pm
By: Letters to the ...

Cal, your opinion column on April 26, 2006, quotes extensively from my recent letter to the editor. In the letter I asked you several questions about your apparent failure to investigate and report accurately on the ongoing litigation between the commissioners and the sheriff. You answered none of them. Rather, you quoted me out of context and tried, once again, to make the commissioners look foolish and worse, like lawbreakers.

We now have two superior court decisions which found the sheriff in violation of state law. What will it take to make your newspaper report the facts and their impact on our taxpayers? You know the commissioners have not violated any laws. Why do you seem so determined to make our citizens believe we might have?

Your Open Records request for our attorney’s work-product to be used in litigation is a waste of time and taxpayers’ money. You know Georgia Law O.C.G.A. 50-18-72 (e) (1) and (2) exempts it from release. Even common sense should tell you that no one would release attorney work-product prior to trial. You, nor any of your readers, would release it until after trial. You have never been denied any information to which you are entitled. Why won’t you ask the sheriff or us for the available documents which clarify what caused these problems?

You’re also trying to convince your readers that anytime commissioners vote in executive session we are breaking the law. You know that Georgia law allows us to deal with three issues in executive session, i.e., personnel, real estate acquisition, and litigation. You also know that GA law, O.C.G.A. 50-14-3 prohibits us from voting in executive session only on personnel matters. We have never violated these restrictions. Why don’t you state the truth, i.e., that you simply don’t like the law?

For you to accuse Vice-Chairman Linda Wells of “leaking” information “from the hidden audit” is unforgivable. You have no reason to believe the issues she spoke of were in any way related to any audit. Linda is a person of total integrity. In fact, the information she shared at the meeting is information that is available in the county’s records. These are available to you and the general public as well.

Linda is honest, hard working, intelligent and extraordinarily dedicated to good government. I believe you know that.

This type of character assassination just to help make your case against the commissioners is a disservice to every citizen of Fayette County. She deserves a public apology.

The issues Linda discussed are among the countless violations of law we are dealing with. Had you been seriously engaged in investigating and reporting on the ongoing litigation you would know that this litigation addresses all the purchases made by the sheriff’s office, not just the drug seizure funds. The purchases made with drug seizure funds certainly complicate these issues but are only a very small part of the violation of state law and the waste of taxpayers’ money. The judge understands and has ruled on that.

It’s time for you to begin objective reporting on this litigation. As I’ve stated before, it is neither frivolous nor insignificant. Cal, I’ll say it again. It’s time for you to inform the public. They need to get the facts from your newspaper, not just opinions.

Greg Dunn, chairman
Fayette County Board of Commissioners
Fayetteville, Ga.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by robert m on Thu, 05/04/2006 - 8:45pm.

I agree. Linda Wells ought to publicly apologize for her incompetence, resign her commission post and leave the county. So should Dunn, they are (borrowing a phrase from my dear old mother), two peas in a pod.

Can anyone fanthom the utter arrogance of these two? The misguiding legal advice from an aging county attorney, displaying greed beyond comprehension? Can anyone imagine the gaul to accuse candidate Maxwell of being a lawbreaker, when he pursued their silly sign ordinace in court, won the case, and all to defend our constitutional right to free speech? Dunn failed to tell you that they secretly agreed to pay his attorney fees in an attempt to avoid embarassment.

I understand the county attorney is now a citizen of Fayette County. Does anyone believe he has the best interest of this county at heart?

According to some bloggers here, there are several court cases that have clearly defined the relationship between the sheriff and the county commissioners. The county attorney should be acquainted with these court rulings, knowledgeable of the state constitution and statutes, and should have steered this commission away from the futile lawsuits.

Now, we don't really expect Dunn or Wells to amend their ego driven errant ways, so it's up to us, the citizens of Fayette County to replace them.

Submitted by justaskin on Fri, 05/05/2006 - 1:15pm.

Can you give examples of incompetence? How do they display greed?
I am sure you can provide some evidence of arrogance,so I would like to know what they might be. I had read an article in the AJC that indicated several instances where the laws regarding the sheriff where sort of confusing. Do you have the court cases?

Submitted by robert m on Fri, 05/05/2006 - 5:04pm.

For starters, pursuing multiple lawsuits they had every reason to know they would lose, hundreds of thousands of dollars, at the expense of you and I and all of the taxpayers in the county. It's the epitome of poor judgement.

Arrogance? Attempting to foist an unconstitutional sign ordinance on the citizens of the county they were elected to represent and then accusing the candidate who fought successfully to have it undone of being a criminal.

I believe the county maintains a law library, or you might be able to research these statutes and cases at the local libraries.

H. Hamster's picture
Submitted by H. Hamster on Fri, 05/05/2006 - 5:56am.

Never thought that term limits were a good idea, but Bob Lenox, Steve Brown and Greg Dunn have convinced me that giving people like that power for more than 4 years is a huge mistake. Brown actually did more damage than the other two in less than 4 years, but he is exceptionally talented in that regard.

What do you all think? One 4-year term enough? How do we get that done?


Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Fri, 05/05/2006 - 1:36pm.

Actually, I like the idea of Voting for the most worthy person.

Submitted by Fayetteresident on Tue, 05/02/2006 - 10:17pm.

OH MY GOODNESS!!!!
Greg, WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?
I bet your mouth is sore from sticking your big fat foot in it! Don't you know that you shouldn't {{{EDITED}}} off the editor of the paper? Cal and the rest of us are getting the last laugh... time for you to just tuck your tail and hide!
Cal didn't have to make you & Linda look foolish, you two are getting good at that all by yourselves.

Hey, now that the "litigation" is no longer an issue, what's your next excuse for not giving us the info about the "fraud audit"?

Submitted by Sly Fox on Tue, 05/02/2006 - 8:34pm.

The only apology should be from you. You have wasted so much of our money with your disputes. I can not recall a more devisive public figure in the history of Fayette County. On the night of July 18, please take a hard look at all the poor choices you have made.

abeautifulday4us's picture
Submitted by abeautifulday4us on Tue, 05/02/2006 - 7:08pm.

Whoa, Greg-- Betcha wanna take this one back....Obviously the Judge shares the same view as most other people. Isn't it predictable that this "secret audit" that was withheld from the public couldn't be used in court because of your sneaky, low-rent lawyers. I think those lawyers ought to cough up all their fees and also pay for that secret audit that the judge tossed in the trash can.

"Time for a Change"; Time to end the litigation; Time to end the lawyers and accountants and engineering cartel from getting fat.

Can't wait for Janet "the Natural" and her spin while yer packing yer bags to return to Joisey.


Submitted by rhino on Tue, 05/02/2006 - 7:24pm.

I wonder what we paid the 6th Commissioner for this letter.

cogitoergofay's picture
Submitted by cogitoergofay on Tue, 05/02/2006 - 7:45pm.

I wonder how reliable is the legal advice were getting on zoning ? I mean sooner or later the developers are going to start suing our county too. And if our legal advisors were this far off the mark on the Sheriff's case with the audit and everything what will happen when we have to go to court on zoning cases ? It seems like the Commissioners have lost every law suit they filed. Some smart developer is going to stick it to us when they finally get around to challenging us.


H. Hamster's picture
Submitted by H. Hamster on Wed, 05/03/2006 - 6:56pm.

Everyone suspected your arrogance, now it has been proven in a court of law. You like the rule of law, or so you have said. Now the rule of election law is coming up. You are outta here.


Submitted by Vernon on Wed, 05/03/2006 - 7:00pm.

AMEN !!!!

mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Mon, 05/08/2006 - 7:08pm.

That's right!!
meow


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.