Good experiments vanquish false beliefs

Tue, 04/04/2006 - 4:25pm
By: The Citizen

In the history of science, there are many notable examples of cherished beliefs among physicists that turn out to be totally false. Two classic examples will prove the point.
It is quite obvious that energy flows continuously; just turn on your kitchen stove and watch the temperature rise.
But, a young German physicist, named Max Planck, took very precise measurements and found the contrary: energy is “quantized”; that is, it comes in small, individual packets, so small it appears as if energy were continuously increasing or decreasing. The quantum of energy, now a firm fact, changed the views of physicists forever.
Now consider the obvious fact of relative motion. Two cars that move toward each other move faster than if one car stopped. This must “clearly” be true of all moving things.
Not so; the classic experiment of Michelson and Morley showed that light, unlike other things, always moves at the vary same speed relative to other things - cars, planets, etc. This fact, the speed of light is constant in a vacuum, forms the foundation of the Special Theory of Relativity.
Good experiments can also help us determine the correctness of religious beliefs. A major study, just completed, shows that prayers for the sick don’t help in anyway whatsoever. Persons prayed for are just as sick as persons for whom no prayers were offered.
Although prayers are useless, emotional support, state of mind, and general optimism do help patients feel better and occasionally improve physically.
This century offers the possibility of experimentally determining which of our most cherished beliefs are valid or mere surmise or outright superstition.
Peter Duran
Fayetteville, Ga.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
muddle's picture
Submitted by muddle on Wed, 04/05/2006 - 6:28pm.

Mr. Duran, our Village Atheist, heralds the news: Prayer is ineffectual recent study says. We are to believe that a limited study has conclusively shown that one of the cherished beliefs of millions has been "vanquished" as false.

What an odd study. Who conducted it? How was it controlled? It is difficult for me to imagine such a study being done in an objective and principled manner. Was everyone told that they were on someone's "prayer list" though only a subset of people actually were--to check for a placebo effect? Unless people were called into the experiment and asked specifically to utter prayers on behalf of some of the subjects how could they know anything about the nature (and frequency and fervency) of the prayers? But if they were, why in the world should anyone suppose that such an artificial environment is any test for the efficacy of prayer? And, when there have been multitudes of people who have claimed that prayer has made an objective difference in their lives, unless one already has an agenda, why assume that this sliver of a study could topple the testimony of centuries?

Mr Duran is perhaps overconfident. His statement that "This century offers the possibility of experimentally determining which of our most cherished beliefs are valid or mere surmise or outright superstition" sounds like the stuff of a hundred years ago.

Should we assume that "experimental determination" is the highest court in attempting to discern the true from the false? If so, then show me how the belief that "Experimental determination is the highest court...." is itself open to experimental determination. The scientism behind such a notion appears to be "outright superstition."

-----------
"The philosophical case against theism is rather easily dealt with. There is no philosophical case against theism."
--G.K. Chesterton


Submitted by Islewood on Wed, 04/05/2006 - 2:57pm.

Citizen wrote, “A major study, just completed, shows that prayers for the sick don’t help in anyway whatsoever.”

In science one always needs to consider the extrapolation from research conditions to the uncontrolled environment in which we live (from science to technology). For many people, prayer works. It works for me, for example. In the unmistakable silence in which God answers my prayers I find the capacity to change or forebear. The God of my faith need not do either of these.

So though some might think it is but talking to myself, even that has some impact beyond “whatsoever.” And, if God is not listening, then at least one person has heard and many a human will listen to himself before taking advice from another.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.