-->
Search the ArchivesNavigationContact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
The Great EMS Debate of 2006Well, it appears we've got our new (or old) "hot button" issue...tax equity and EMS. Since it appears we have two "champions" of each cause - intheknow and Peter Pfifer, let's get the facts. Here's what I see is the issue: Peachtree City has an EMS service, and has had it for some time. Peachtree City pays a portion of its taxes to Fayette County to provide EMS service (as well as other services). They also pay their City taxes for the same services. EMS personnel for both the City and County are also firefighters, if I understand their staffings correctly. I've had some experiences with both services. Neither one is bad; they both did what they were supposed to do. Both got to the scenes in reasonable times, both were professional, both seemed to get the patients to the hospital in one piece. Peachtree City goes out to the County when the County runs out of ambulances. On a (rare) occasion, the County returns the favor. Fayette County, according to their website, has four ambulances for the entire county. Peachtree City has four for the city. From the retreat presentation (yes, I like reading boring municipal meeting materials) that Peachtree City did a few weeks ago, each ambulance (City and County) does comparable volume of calls per year. So if Fayette County needs Peachtree City's help, it sounds like Fayette County needs more ambulances. But on taxes, Peachtree City pays "twice" for services? Well, Peachtree City has its tax, plus a portion of the overall County tax bill in addition to its tax (I think - please educate me if I am wrong). With those two figures, the City staffs its ambulances and pay its firefighters. If the County were to remove the tax that the City is "double-paying", that would mean less revenue for everybody. Which would probably mean that Peachtree City would have to RAISE its city tax to keep at the same funding level (or raise the rate it charges to transport and medicate someone who needs them). Looking at it, what's the equity argument? As a taxpayer, I believe that as long as we are CAPABLE of using the County services (and no one has ever said we're not) we pay for, the City's not being double taxed. The more I think about it, the more I think things are okay the way they are. Am I wrong? If so, PLEASE EXPLAIN, because I'm sure I'm not the only person who might want a little more information. Reality Bytes's blog | login to post comments |