Horgan won majority of Fayette precincts

Thu, 03/23/2006 - 4:46pm
By: John Munford

Horgan had strong vote totals in Tyrone

Robert Horgan received the most votes in 30 of Fayette County’s 36 voting precincts in Tuesday’s special election to fill a vacant seat on the Fayette County Board of Commissioners.

By contrast, second-place challenger Emory Wilkerson won only three precincts and tied Horgan in a fourth precinct.

Horgan was the only white candidate in the race, facing four black challengers in fellow Republicans Wilkerson and Malcolm Hughes and Democrats Wendy Felton and Charles Rousseau. Hughes and Rousseau won one precinct each.

Overall, Horgan won 51.7 percent of votes countywide, followed by Wilkerson in second place with 29.05 percent. Neither of the three remaining candidates mustered support in double-digits percentage-wise.

In five precincts, Horgan scored votes from at least two-thirds of voters: Brooks (south Fayette County, Fayetteville East (north east Fayetteville), Woolsey (just north of the Brooks precinct along the Flint River), Shakerag West (central Peachtree City), and Dogwood (in north central Fayette). In four other precincts, Horgan won more than 60 percent of the vote: Flint (east Fayette County), Hopeful (north central Fayette County), Rareover (Tyrone) and Starrsmill (south central Fayette County).

Horgan’s highest margin of victory was in the Brooks precinct, where he got 74.27 percent of the vote.

In Wilkerson’s three precinct wins, he failed to secure a majority of voters, which is not atypical given the field consisted of five candidates.

Wilkerson won the Kedron precinct in west Peachtree City with 47.44 percent of the vote, the Aberdeen precinct in central Peachtree City with 48.74 percent of the vote and the Fielding Ridge precinct in north central Peachtree City with 44.27 of the vote. Horgan finished in second in all three of those precincts.

Wilkerson and Horgan tied in the McIntosh precinct in northeast Peachtree City with 44.62 percent of the vote, where exactly 58 votes were recorded for both candidates.

In the more diverse north Fayette area, Wilkerson finished third in both the Europe and Kenwood precincts. Hughes barely won the Europe precinct (on the northern tip of the county) with 25.31 percent as Rousseau scored 24.07 percent of votes compared to Wilkerson’s 22.82 percent.

The Kenwood precinct, which is immediately west of the Europe precinct, is roughly a third of the size of the Europe precinct. Rousseau won Kenwood handily with 45.21 percent of votes, compared to Horgan’s 23.29 percent and Wilkerson’s 17.81 percent.

Among Kenwood voters, Wilkerson finished third as Rousseau took 45.21 percent of the vote, followed by Horgan with 23.29 percent; Wilkerson scored just 17.81 percent of voters in that precinct.

Only 8.37 percent of Fayette’s 62,692 voters cast ballots in the election.

In a letter to The Citizen, Republican-party favorite Wilkerson thanked the voters who supported him, along with giving kudos to the party. Wilkerson also refused to look back at how his campaign was run.

“I refuse to succumb to what we often refer to as ‘armchair quarterbacking’ or the more common notion of hindsight,” he said.

Wilkerson has come under fire for comments attributed to him shortly after the election where he blamed his loss on a racial issue.

Horgan did not respond to phone calls before press time.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
mapleleaf's picture
Submitted by mapleleaf on Sat, 03/25/2006 - 7:01am.

Progressive as it is for providing its readers the opportunity to blog, The Citizen (paper and online) is a dinosaur of a paper when it comes to graphics and tables. This whole analysis of how the votes were split up could have been presented on a map of Fayette County, with each precinct properly identified on the map, and a table could have shown the vote split by precinct.

The obvious question at the end of all this is what would the candidates have done under district voting, i.e., if only the District One votes had been counted. Why wasn't that question answered?


Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Sat, 03/25/2006 - 8:00am.

Yes indeed, let's show plainly the election results redone as if there were district voting. Let's see if the turnout in the district was more or less than the 9%. Let's see who would have won by how many votes - or which two would have been in a runnoff.

Then we can sit back and read all kinds of convoluted explanations of why those results are not correct or racist or something.

John Munford please help us out here. Keep the ball rolling.


Submitted by Sailon on Thu, 03/30/2006 - 7:20pm.

Do you really think the turnout would have been the same if the Northern district were voting only for the Northern district? Think a little about different circumstances. Do you like to participate in something where you have no chance?

John Munford's picture
Submitted by John Munford on Thu, 03/30/2006 - 4:30pm.

Sorry gang, but a follow-up story on the election wasn't in the cards this week. The PTC Council retreat did me in. Too many stories to write, not enough time.

Never mind the child predator trial and then the Tyrone manhunt.

Personally, I think given the low voter turnout any article hypothesizing this or that would be just that. That's just too much reading between the lines I'd say.

We've got more important issues surfacing for this coming Wednesday's paper. Check it out!

Until next time...


Submitted by twilson on Thu, 03/23/2006 - 5:17pm.

John Munford did a good job analyzing the voting by precinct and the results were what one would have imagined. I don't see much of an argument for racism in the voting, inasmuch as the census numbers indicate about 16% black population and the black candidates polled 48.3% among themselves.

Has anyone considered that had there been only one black candidate, Emory Wilkerson, he would have made a tremendous showing of the whole 48.3%? I am convinced that had Emory Wilkerson started earlier with more signs and door to door contacting, things might well have been different.

Now, Emory would have been better served without the ethics violation flap which appeared to have been totally orchestrated. That kind of
politicking turns people off.

Finally, I hate that Emory allowed himself to be dragged into the "race baiting" crap that may hurt his political aspirations in the future. I can understand the disappointment of losing, but blaming it on "race" just doesn't fit the facts.

mapleleaf's picture
Submitted by mapleleaf on Sun, 03/26/2006 - 8:01am.

Let’s think beyond race for a minute. Wilkerson is a lawyer for an insurance company, working “in the field,” which means he is not working at the home office. So what does he do for State Farm, if not trying to help his company pay as little money as possible to the victims of its customers’ negligence? I concede he may also be trying to keep his company from being defrauded by scamsters. But somehow his job does not cast him as customer-friendly, and he did not come across as a warm puppy.

Now some people may go beyond that, and reflect on Charles Walker and Bill Campbell, two lawyer-politicians who were both fairly recently convicted for crimes related to their political office. They were clever and smart, and somehow folks are wary of people who are clever and smart, and who know all the rules and the loopholes, etc.

So who’s to blame people who pick as commissioner the ordinary guy who fixes transmissions and thinks like ordinary people?


Submitted by SJQ on Sat, 03/25/2006 - 10:02am.

Has Emory or others considered that less than 9% of the county voted and had ANY canidate gotten more voters involved they would have won. In this situation... race had nothing to do with anything...sick of all the BS.
Its simple...get the vote out or lose...black, white, green or other...gezz...I wish I had physical characteristic that in a pinch, I could always point out to the world as a reason for my for outright failure...SHAME ON EMORY...THE RACE CARD IS WRONG AND SO ARE THOSE WHO USE IT.

Submitted by oldsimon on Sat, 03/25/2006 - 8:04pm.

Horgan played the race card all through the campaign. He referred to our "heritage" several times. Callers for him made similar comments. He put his white face on his signs so people would be sure to see he was the white one. Some old voters at the polls asked which one is the white one. They did not even know his name but wanted to vote for the white one. Emory was right on in his election night comments. The clueless white one won over a superior black one. Race was a factor. Horgan doesn't even know what the county commission does.

Submitted by SJQ on Sun, 03/26/2006 - 8:05am.

You do not know Robert Horgan...
Sounds more like sour grapes...thanks for proving my point.
They have medication for what you suffer from...

H. Hamster's picture
Submitted by H. Hamster on Thu, 03/23/2006 - 8:14pm.

Yes indeed, the ethics accusation against Horgan made by him or his handlers definitely hurt Emory in the election but his comments about race over experience after the election ended his political future.

But the real lesson here for you race-obsessed people is that radical black candidates only get a few black votes and obviously no white votes. A moderate black candidate - like Emory - gets even fewer black votes - but not enough to win. He also gets a few white votes - not enough to win. So what's the lesson? DON'T BE PUSHY ABOUT RACE IT DOES NOT WORK! OK? GOT IT?


Submitted by oldsimon on Sat, 03/25/2006 - 8:07pm.

Only time will tell about Horgan's ethics. He sure started off by breaking the election law. But, he pleads ignorance. If the voters buy that, then they get what they deserve.

Submitted by robert m on Fri, 03/24/2006 - 7:17am.

Rodent, you can't be that naive! Robert Horgan or his handlers bring ethics charges against himself? How silly. Even newcomers to the field of politics aren't that stupid.

A good question is why did the lawyer/chariman/mama sit on the alleged anonymous ethics charge until 10 days before the election?

Perhaps Richard Hobbs can explain that.

Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Sat, 03/25/2006 - 8:10am.

The statement "the ethics accusation against Horgan made by him or his handlers definitely hurt Emory in the election" was lousy grammar, but "him" referred to Emory as hamster's was a response to twilson's post. You read enough of this stuff you get to know what various people or animals actually mean. Not sure that benefits anyone, but there it is.

To be perfectly clear, Emory (or his people) messed up big time by promoting the ethics charge against Horgan. It looked desperate and was.

I saw hamster driving out of town this morning with kayaks, trailer and enough camping gear for a week, so I thought I'd jump in and help.


Submitted by oldsimon on Sat, 03/25/2006 - 8:12pm.

Emory did not bring the ethics charge. He did not know about it until he read it in the paper. Robert (and his buddy Sam
chapman) brought the charge on himself. How weird that the Board that was looking into the charge is accused of wrong doing when it was Horgan himself. That kind of defense seems to work in today's world.

Submitted by SJQ on Sun, 03/26/2006 - 8:14am.

Can you spell demencha...I can't but you got it...
I wonder what it like to live in your bigoted fantasy land?
Confusing and disappointing I imagine...
Get a life...

Submitted by robert m on Sat, 03/25/2006 - 8:41am.

Thanks, I was hoping that was the way you meant it. I hate that Emory let himself get dragged into the race baiting, he had a promising political future here, but that's now in question.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.