Imker puts PTC Council on spot over budget

Thu, 02/04/2010 - 10:41pm
By: John Munford

Claims comments about staff levels misinterpreted

In a rather unusual move Thursday night, Peachtree City Councilman Eric Imker strode to the microphone during the public comment portion of the meeting ... to address his fellow council members.

Imker challenged his fellow council members to develop a budget that avoids a tax increase, avoids service cuts and isn’t balanced with city reserves.

Imker also explained a comment he made at his informal budget meeting last weekend about how the city has too many employees.

“Do I think we could get by with one less headcount? Yes. Two or three? Maybe. More, I don’t know. But it will be the whole council — not me — that makes that decision.”

At his weekend budget meeting, Imker made the comment that the city’s budget was not in good shape “because I think we have too many heads.” Soon after he said if the city “could cut and save another half million dollars, we could buy another extension to the Gathering Place” or another soccer field or build a permanent shelter over the Kedron pool.

Imker also stated at his budget meeting that he felt the city’s planning and building department was run as lean as possible. He also said the city’s stormwater department had 9.5 employees and that he would “have something to say about that later.”

Imker’s budget meeting was held at City Hall Jan. 30 and 40 residents took part, listening to his ideas and providing Imker with ideas of their own.

In his address to council Thursday night, Imker said he wants to restrict each department to keeping its budget for the 2010-2011 fiscal year the same as it is for this year.

Imker also challenged each city staff member to brainstorm three cost-saving ideas and present them to their respective department head for consideration at the upcoming City Council retreat.

Though Imker addressed council in his role as a fellow council member, he made a point of stepping down from the dais and speaking from the same microphone used by other citizens who address council during public comments. It also brought him face-to-face with his fellow council members.

After Thursday's council meeting, Imker said he chose the public comment section to share his thoughts because there would be more people in the audience at the beginning of the meeting than at the end, when council members are allowed to make comments and also requests of staff.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by PTClurker on Sun, 02/07/2010 - 9:32am.

I listened to what was said during your Saturday "citizen input budget prep meeting" and watched this past Thursday's council meeting via web-tv and I must say it is long overdue to have someone who seems to actually have the initiative and the common sense to do what the voters put you there to do: A) Listen to the citizens and B) Actually be TAKING ACTION to solve the problem! I'll admit your methods seems a bit unorthodox and could use some polishing, but I'm glad to see that so soon into taking office you've already reviewed almost the entire city budget, come up with a tentative plan to balance it, and are prepared to formally talk with the rest of the council team come budget summit time. I understand (as it's clear many on these boards do not) that personal preparation is the key to effective team collaboration. But besides working with the rest of the council team, heck, I'm just happy someone is actually STEPPING UP to take this previous council's budget mess head on!

I also feel the need (so much so that it spurred me to stop just reading comments and actually create a name to post myself) to point out how ludicrous some of these poster's comments are. To say that you are "Total showmanship with no substance!" proves that many folks on these forums are either completely brain-dead or mentally insane. How in the good Lord's right mind can you say "no substance" when he's actually produced plans, ideas, and a workable path forward in less than a month and a half in office???? Mr. Imker, pay no attention to folks who would throw rocks at actual progress just because your means are unorthodox.

But speaking of unorthodox, I'm glad to see you're not a typical politician. In fact, it seems to me you're not a politician at all and that's EXACTLY what this city needs... less politics and someone who will just get in there, take the hits, and get the job done. Your willingness on Thursday to come "down" to the citizen mic and speak as one of us shows to me you "get it" that you're a representative of the citizens FIRST, and a councilman second. Kudos for being exactly what this city needs right now (and what we elected you to do)... an infusion of no-nonsense, budget repair!

borntorun's picture
Submitted by borntorun on Sun, 02/07/2010 - 1:42pm.

This post is satire, right? Please tell me this is a satirical post and you are not serious!


Submitted by MYTMITE on Sun, 02/07/2010 - 3:41pm.

pulling a Bonkers on us and praising himself under a new name. I would like PTClurker to explain to me what other kind of insane there is besides mentally insane-but then again, being near Valentine's Day--one may be insanely in love (or lust as the case may be). Let's hope and pray that this is only meant to be satire---or Imker patting himself on the back--if not--then we are doomed!!!

JeffC's picture
Submitted by JeffC on Sat, 02/06/2010 - 8:47am.

Why not turn your amphitheater over to private enterprise? The amphitheater loses money and the solution they come up with is to cut the number of shows?

Why is it the city's job to run an amphitheater in the first place? Y'all are supposed to be free market Republicans. Get rid of the staff and contract it out.

I talked to Peter Conlon about it a year or so ago. He's the biggest concert promoter in Georgia in case you don't know who he is. He'd love to make the city a proposal to book acts and/or manage the venue. He told me he'd be willing to discuss any number of arrangements; a cut of each show, a flat payment to the city, a total management contract, whatever. He approached the city years ago and was turned down flat.

You'd have a guaranteed income from the amphitheater plus a reduction in cost to the city by getting rid of most of the management staff?

Why not let him (and others) make you a proposal?

Want me to call him for you?


Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Sun, 02/07/2010 - 10:38am.

How about we do the same thing to the airport - privatize it? And I don't mean just Falcon Field, I mean good old ATL - Hartsfield-Jackson.

And privatizing the amphitheater is a very good idea. I tend to think that Mr. Conlon and any other who were rebuffed by the city under the last 3 mayors for whatever reason will find a more reasonable and receptive council this year.


JeffC's picture
Submitted by JeffC on Mon, 02/08/2010 - 1:42am.

Privatize the airports, too. Suits me if the cities own them but privatize the operations. Hartsfield is a magnet for job favoritism, political corruption and sweetheart lease contracts. Atlanta ought to privatize the trash collection and waste disposal, too. It's a legitimate function for a city to manage the contracts of the private companies to the extent that everybody is covered by a waste disposal service but operating the system from hiring to buying and maintaining the trucks. Why? It's also a legitimate function for the city to decide zoning for the waste disposal sites. After that, put the rest out for bids.

As for the amphitheater, all I want first is for the council to open itself up for proposals. Who knows if a great deal is out there if you won't even entertain a proposal? What would that cost the city? Nothing but the councils time to listen and evaluate whatever ideas were offered. Isn't that kinda what their job is?


Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Mon, 02/08/2010 - 6:57am.

Proposals should be heard. I'd feel better about the whole thing if someone other than Imker brought it up in a council meeting. That guy is starting to creep me out.

The more I think about it, why should the city have the staff expense and no real incentive to strive for a profit. The 2010 lineup and cutbacks are a defensive move and typical government reaction. Let's get some proposals. Are you listening Mr. Haddix?


JeffC's picture
Submitted by JeffC on Mon, 02/08/2010 - 6:04pm.

We agree.

After reading your agreement, I carefully reconsidered my position but I can't find the fault. I'm still a little uneasy, as I'm sure you are, but I think this may be one of those rare occasions where the stars just aligned.

We can probably both take comfort that it won't happen again soon.

Cheers.


Submitted by Spyglass on Fri, 02/05/2010 - 8:54am.

I'm baffled at the electorate.

Submitted by PTC Observer on Sun, 02/07/2010 - 5:35pm.

Read "The Myth of the Rational Voter" - I think it may help you understand the electorate.

Chao

borntorun's picture
Submitted by borntorun on Fri, 02/05/2010 - 4:00pm.

He can't even get his facts straight. He spouts figures and numbers which aren't even true. What a shame the voters passed on Beth Pullias who has proven herself at many council meetings to be knowledgable on so many issues affecting our community to elect this idiot. Imker is a perfect example of the outsider who likes to chunk hand grenades while being an outsider but cannot make the transition to working with others once elected. Politics is about relationships and yes even compromise for the common good at times. A lesson not yet learned by Imker. Here's hoping Beth will throw her hat in the ring again.


carbonunit52's picture
Submitted by carbonunit52 on Fri, 02/05/2010 - 7:17pm.

that I made a mistake. I voted for Imker.

It's not easy being the carbonunit


TinCan's picture
Submitted by TinCan on Sat, 02/06/2010 - 3:22pm.

Thought you and I had nothing in common. Guess when it comes to making mistakes, we do. BTW I'm not far from Crosstown and Robinson and my AT&T U-verse had been operating just fine.


Submitted by GAltant on Fri, 02/05/2010 - 7:21am.

Total showmanship with no substance!
Actions speak louder than words - work as a team with the council to develop a plan to reduce the budget. Stop acting like the lone ranger as though you are the only person interested in balancing the budget. Each person on the council ran under the same principle that they would work hard to reduce expenses...they do not need you grandstanding and lecturing them from the microphone about it...JUST DO IT!
The only people who appreciate your antics is The Citizen..because they get to write about.
You were elected to do a job, so go and do it. TEAMWORK WITH CITY COUNCIL...will get the job done. Stop worming around trying to get headlines, sit still at a meeting for once, listen and do your work.
The only thing I am impressed with so far is Mr. Haddix and other council member's patience with your bullcrap.

wiseowl's picture
Submitted by wiseowl on Fri, 02/05/2010 - 3:04pm.

Those that know Imker are not surprised with his act. As posted by a very WISE person prior to the council elections: "Outside of internet research, I also learned Imker’s braggart personality makes me wonder how he could possibly maintain a good working relationship with other Council members running our city. According to some who have worked with him, this Boy Scout is excessively proud of himself and about as affable as a badger caught in a steel trap.

Further Citizen On-line study makes me wonder if Imker is the type person to accept responsibility – his quote: “I don’t want to take the blame for the $250 or more per family tax hike in 2011 when it was the current administration’s doing.” Not sure if I want to vote for someone quick to ‘point a finger’.


Mike King's picture
Submitted by Mike King on Fri, 02/05/2010 - 3:33pm.

Mr Imker's actions do give me pause, but I'm willing (for now)to accept that his newfound notarity has caused him to focus attention to himself and not to his obvious lack of understanding of his job. Hopefully, he will mature into it.

Should he not, we simply have a clown for the next two years. Sound familiar?


Submitted by intheknow on Fri, 02/05/2010 - 5:20pm.

I attended his little Saturday afternoon saurae, and was amazed to find out Mr. Imker was our saviour. He announced he was a "one-term" councilmen, and not a politician, and was only here to correct the many wrongs of the PTC budget. And maybe once his work was done here, he might run for county commission to straighten them out too.
Once again it seems we have someone whom through local voter apathy has been elected to our council. Cal Beverly has always loved this kind of stuff, as several years of a previous elected official (clown) made for all kinds of headlines and ultimately embarrassment to to our city. Mr. Imker seems to have won on the typical politician platform of " no new taxes / cut taxes", this without knowing that there really isn't much to cut, unless you want to Destroy what most of us moved here for. I hope, since he's going to be one of our council members at least a couple of years, that he changes his attitude and works with council and staff. It's obvious he's gone into this with his own preconceived opinions and mindset, and thinks he knows all, but from witnessing his presentation (complete with a few of his vocal supporters), he has much to learn.

Submitted by MYTMITE on Fri, 02/05/2010 - 11:47am.

bigger agenda. I voted for him because he seemed the lesser of all evils for that post. He is acting as if he has a mandate from The Maker and has done everything possible to cause dissention between himself and the rest of the council. This is not the way to start a new year as a new council member. I applaud the council for not taking the bait. Mr. Imker needs to give himself a good talking to and make the decision to do what the people elected him to do--work WITH the council to do what is best for the community and stop being such a hot dog. Believe me, Mr. Imker,you are not winning yourself any kudos or backers. Grow-up and do what you were elected to do.

Submitted by PTCGOIL on Thu, 02/04/2010 - 11:27pm.

heart seems to be in the right place.

He just has two different beings in one body that come to the meetings. One just wants to be john q. citizen, and the other wants to be the budget cutter. That's OK, hopefully someday soon they will sit down with each other and come to a good place for both of them.

I'll say this, so far, the new Council has shown much more conscience for all of us in 3 meetings than the last council did in years.

A very novel approach to governing.

Submitted by GAltant on Fri, 02/05/2010 - 7:46pm.

Dissociative identity disorder (previously known as multiple personality disorder) is a fairly common effect of severe trauma during early childhood, usually extreme, repetitive physical and/or emotional abuse.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.