Cops seize 280 pounds of pot

Mon, 02/27/2006 - 1:33pm
By: Ben Nelms

Lt. Lee Brown and Agent Ken Hester
Union City Police have put the skids on a locally developing drug smuggling tactic, having netted 280 pounds of marijuana in the past three weeks valued at nearly $333,000.

Arrested Monday and charged with trafficking were 41 year-old Union City resident Gabriel Ndengey and 36 year-old Snellville resident Bubacar Touray, according to Union City Police Lt. Lee Brown.

Brown said his department was contacted last week about an impending shipment of marijuana by Sheriff’s Office investigators in Riverside County, Calif. That information led to the arrests, the confiscation of three vehicles and a large quantity of marijuana at Spice Clothing on Ga. Highway 138 in the new Wal-Mart plaza, said Brown. Marijuana shipments on Feb. 2 and Feb. 17, both destined to be received by Ndengey at Spice Clothing, totaled 180 pounds with a street value of $205,200, Brown said. Ndengey appeared to be a mid-level distributor whose product would be sold in the metro Atlanta area, according to Brown.

“On Friday morning, Feb. 17, we received some information from the Riverside County, Calif., Sheriff’s Department concerning some packages destined for an address in Union City that they believed contained marijuana,” Brown said. “They had intercepted five packages in California and these had slipped by. We initiated an investigation and obtained several search warrants. We executed a search warrant at a business known as Spice Clothing and during that search we recovered roughly 180 pounds of marijuana and arrested the owner of the business and another individual and seized several vehicles.”

Though packaged in shrink-wrapped plastic and surrounded with cloth soaked in liquid detergent to mask the scent, Brown said California agents became aware of the Union City-bound parcels after drug dogs alerted on the boxes last week. Unknown were the contents of the other boxes, two or three packages per week for the past few months, that had been delivered to Spice Clothing, said Brown.

What Union City agents found at Spice Clothing was much more than unopened boxes of marijuana. Brown said agents discovered and seized numerous items of paperwork and accounting ledgers that indicated the commingling of business funds with the funds gained from the illegal sale of marijuana. At the business, agents seized a 2006 Hummer H2 that had been purchased by Ndengey. Paperwork in the vehicle, said Brown, indicated Ndengey had placed a down payment of $30,000 for the recently purchased vehicle.

Brown said retail operations appeared to have been conducted at Spice Clothing, noting that some sales receipts from clothing purchases had been made. He said the store was well stocked, though not a lot of money was found in the cash register.

During the execution of a search warrant at Ndengey’s Bluffs Circle residence, agents seized additional paperwork and travel documentation indicating that he had been sending U.S. currency overseas and had been making cash deposits averaging $6,000-7,000 per deposit in domestic bank accounts. The legal status of both men was called into question, Brown said, adding that Touray had arrived in the United States in recent weeks from Gambia and that Ndengey was thought to have entered the U.S. as a stow-away.

Agents also discovered that Ndengey was laundering proceeds from the sale of marijuana by using cash to purchase vehicles and then reselling them, Brown said. Agents at the residence seized a 2001 Chevrolet Tahoe and a 2000 Acura TL that appeared to have been purchased using drug proceeds, he added. Agents found the titles for numerous other vehicles at the residence.

Brown said a developing trend in the area involves shipping smaller quantities of drugs, 80 pounds or less in the case of marijuana, by common carrier delivery services.

“One of the new trends we’re seeing now is shipping small quantities of drugs, be it marijuana or methamphetamine or whatever, through a common carrier. They ship 50-80 pounds (of marijuana) at a time,” Brown said. “The logic behind that is that if you lose one shipment you lose 50-80 pounds, whereas you could lose an entire tractor-trailer load if it becomes intercepted.”

Union City agents also seized 100 pounds of marijuana Feb. 6 and arrested 24 year-old Fairburn resident Rodrigo Mendoza, according to Brown. Mendoza was charged with trafficking, reports said. Though the marijuana was also shipped by a common carrier the two incidents did not appear to be connected, Brown said. Union City agents arrested Mendoza after intercepting the marijuana at a vacant Union City residence, he said.

Brown said Union City’s proximity to Atlanta, I-85 and the airport makes it easily accessible to various types of spill-over crime. It was obvious Monday afternoon that Brown was satisfied with the recent shipments of marijuana have been confiscated. Those quantities in total are larger than what agents had seen entering the city in years past and is attributable to the new approach to shipping. What lingered in his words, like those of so many others in law enforcement, is the unknown quantities of drugs that never get seized.

“It makes you wonder. We intercepted these packages but how many packages got through before we intercepted these. This was just one individual,” Brown said.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by dopplerobserver on Mon, 02/27/2006 - 3:32pm.

Has any Fayette or other local county cop ever called California or Florida and set them up for an arrest in their area? We seem to be able to buy helicopters and cop sports cars with information from those areas. The point is: it is getting a little annoying for the locals to brag with pictures about busts where the extent of the investigation was to locate the address given to them!

Submitted by Fayetteresident on Tue, 02/28/2006 - 1:20pm.

I'm not sure why you are annoyed... The story you are referring to involves Union City - NOT Fayette County... and so what if the "address was given to them". I'd rather be "lucky" than good any day of the week! You need to get a life if something as trivial as this gets you annoyed!

Submitted by SandySue on Wed, 03/01/2006 - 12:36am.

I think it is good thing to "brag" about drug busts. Any help from anyone to keep drugs off the streets is a good thing in my mind, no matter what city, county or state it happens in.
Let all those slugs out there know this area is tuff. It should tell those slugs not to come this way, they will be found out.
Just like the PTC Policy trapping the child sex predators. Even if it scares one off from contacting our children that is good thing.
Keep the drugs off the street anyway you can. We have more drugs than any of us want to admit in this area.
Congratulations to the local law enforcement.

Submitted by Fayetteresident on Wed, 03/01/2006 - 2:12pm.

It's nice to see that I'm not alone in supporting our local law enforcement agencies! I'm appalled at how many people post such negative comments directed at the very people that are trying to help them!

The comments may be the result of several letters to the editor from Fayette Co. Commissioners accusing the Sheriff's Dept. of "questionable accountability". They intentionally misled readers to sway public opinion. This misuse of public office reflects poorly on their integrity. They need to "shape up or ship out"!

Submitted by thenatural on Wed, 03/01/2006 - 6:06pm.

Fayetteresident you seem to want people to think that accountability and support for the law enforcement are mutually exclusive. Talking about misleading. Nobody disputes that the law enforcement in this county is first rate. Sheriff Johnson's fine officers are good lawmen (and women). But that does not mean that some be allowed to spend drug money without some assurance that it is being done properly. The era of "trust me" disappeared with Richard Nixon's presidency. I much prefer Ronald Reagan's approach....Trust...but verify.

Submitted by robert m on Wed, 03/01/2006 - 7:25pm.

The big question here is who gets to decide how drug money is spent. There is no question that the law says it is to be used to enhance the operations of the law enforcement agencies that participated in the drug busts that resulted in the booty.

I believe the sheriff's department has said that it makes reports to both the federal and state agencies regarding how the monies are expended. Additionally, the county pays for audits each year.

No tax dollars are involved. Should the sheriff, who is elected to perform the sheriff's job decide, or Commissioner Dunn, who is not elected to do the sheriff's job?

Kind of a no brainer, ain't it?

Submitted by Lawdawga on Thu, 03/02/2006 - 2:21pm.

In agreement with you 100% !!! The law enforcement makes the bust....the law enforcement deserves to reap the rewards. These men and women who work law enforcement are terribly underpaid and risk their lives every day. They deserve to have the "best" of anything that makes their job safer, more efficient, and better. How on earth could anyone begrudge the Sheriff being able to spend drug money or dispose of any property seized as a result of a drug bust?! Who knows better than the Sheriff what his deputies need? Of course, there needs to be some sort of accountability --- just to keep an honest man honest. Lawdawga

Submitted by thenatural on Wed, 03/01/2006 - 10:36pm.

Robert M... actually there is no question about who gets to decide how the drug money is spent. The sheriff does without a doubt. That fact has never been in question or part of any knowledgeable discussion. The sheriff's department submits its records to the feds. The county audits the records that the sheriff's department chooses to submit, not to be confused with a full paper trail that complies with the standard operating procedures used by the county or GAAP standards. That part is missing from what I have heard. Am I suggesting the the records that they submit for audit are incomplete?
No, but then again we really do not know do we? I trust the sheriff, but why do his people refuse to comply with the same procedures, processes and standards of conduct that all the other county departments are required to meet? Again, trust but verify.

As far as trying to demonize Dunn for "running" the sheriff's department, nice try at deflecting the issue. If someone can show me one comment, on or off the record that indicates that Dunn wants to be sheriff then I will quit this line of discussion. I only wish it were a no brainer but until all of this sees the bright light of full disclosure we should all continue to be concerned.

Buckwheat Rules's picture
Submitted by Buckwheat Rules on Tue, 02/28/2006 - 10:55am.

True, it might be annoying to some, however it's called "PR." The Sheriff's office knows everyone loves drama so they're putting up pictures of cops standing next to a big pile of pot. This way, even if you don't read the story, this visual picture tells your mind, "Hey, they must be doing a good job busting up drugs coming into the county." It wins the citizens over and makes buying a new helicoptor or other new gadgets and toys in the future that much easier to swallow for the taxpayers.

Bottom Line: It's all about the marketing.


Submitted by Lawdawga on Thu, 03/02/2006 - 2:33pm.

Hmmm...are you suggesting the helicopter was purchased as a toy? Of course most adults love to have high tech gadgets and toys, but if it helps a law enforcement officer do his job when he isn't "playing" with it, then I'd have to say its' worth is justified. The more gadgets law enforcement has, the more likely they are to succeed in getting their job done. Although, I believe most of their gadgets, including the helicopter, are purchased from money seized from a drug bust or other crime, I'd much rather spend my tax dollars for these items than I would for shrubbery in the median; a courthouse that was too small when it was built and then another justice center too big, etc., etc. I'd like to see our Police Departments and Sheriff's Department have the latest technology in every gadget available to law enforcement. It deters crime. Lawdawga

Submitted by Fayetteresident on Tue, 02/28/2006 - 1:48pm.

Hey, you need to read some of the articles instead of just looking at the pictures! If you had, you would know that the taxpayers didn't pay for the helicopter and the taxpayers don't purchase undercover cars... Those items come from the "good job of busting up drugs coming into our county"... Really, don't you guys have something or someone better to "beat up on"?
How do you have the (edited) actually say that the Sheriff's office loves drama, therefore, that is why the're putting up pictures of cops standing next to a big pile of pot??? The men in the pictures have families, however, they put their lives on the line on a daily basis to protect our community. The hours are terrible, the pay is poor and obviously the respect is declining.

Bottom Line: With friends like you on their side, who needs enemies?

Submitted by thenatural on Tue, 02/28/2006 - 9:14pm.

You are right we are very fortunate that we do not have to pay for helicopters with tax dollars. That does not address the issue of whether or not we need a helicopter (much less two). You are also correct that tax dollars do not pay for undercover cars. Some of them are confiscated under a FEDERAL law. If the sheriff buys others we do not know. You see he does not account for how he spends the drug money. We do know that he purchased a "used"(with 27 miles on it) Dodge Charger for his number one minion.That does the beg the question...what else is the sheriff buying with this largesse? Gee..we don't know because he and his minions do not have to account for it at all. Am I the only one that is disturbed by this behavior?

Submitted by Fayetteresident on Wed, 03/01/2006 - 1:41pm.

I was just wondering how YOU knew that the "used" Dodge Charger had 27 miles on it? You better be careful not to give away your true identity... Gee... you have "inside" info AND a grudge with the Sheriff's Dept... One could only imagine who "thenatural" really is...
The only "behavior" that we should be disturbed by is yours! Please find another subject to write about because your personal vendetta against "someone" at the Sheriff's Dept. is getting old!

Submitted by thenatural on Wed, 03/01/2006 - 5:41pm.

Hate to burst your "second gunman on the grassy knoll" mindset Fayetteresident, but my information came from a more conventional source. You want to hear this stuff first hand from those close to it? Go to Melear's for breakfas any day of the week. That is all I have to do. There are some of the "regulars" there that seem to take great pleasure in sharing this kind of "confidential" information with anyone that will listen. I did not realize it was inside information, since it is coming from the side of the issue that you seem to believe I am attacking. It still amazes me that anyone that disagrees with how the sheriff's department handles drug money is on a vendetta, and anyone who wants to look the other way is a supporter of local law enforcement.

Submitted by Fayetteresident on Thu, 03/02/2006 - 10:18am.

THANK GOODNESS! I was afraid your info came from the rumor mill! But, since you heard it at Melears, IT MUST BE TRUE!!! Kenny must be so proud!
Now when I read any of "thenatural's" posts, I will "consider the source"!

Submitted by thenatural on Thu, 03/02/2006 - 10:51am.

Ah Fayette,what can I say. Why is it that you always respond with a deflection from the issue.

I am not going to debate the validity of the information. That fact that it was at Melear's is only relevant in that the information came from one of Kenny's regulars. The accuracy of the information....from that regular...is not in question.
And you are right..anyone who discloses more information than that here can probably expect a reaction from the sheriff similar to his recent treatment of county employees over cars.

Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Thu, 03/02/2006 - 10:37am.

Melears is fine.

Submitted by iluvthebubble on Tue, 02/28/2006 - 11:04pm.

You say the Sheriff and "his minions do not have to account for it [federal forfeiture money] at all." You are wrong.

Federal law requires the Sheriff to submit an annual report detailing how he uses the federal forfeiture funds. He has done this. He also has to account for it to us, the voters who elected him.

Federal guidelines set forth how the Sheriff may use the forfeited funds. He is NOT permitted to spend the funds on things that should be covered by tax money, e.g. salaries. Forfeiture funds are "bonuses," but only to be spent on law enforcement purposes. The Sheriff IS permitted to spend it on helicopters and "used" Dodge Chargers if he sees fit.

Ask the Sheriff's department for a copy of his annual reports over the last several years to find out how he's spent the federal funds. If you don't like how he's spent it, write a letter to the paper, tell your neighbors, and don't vote for him if he runs again.

Submitted by bladderq on Tue, 02/28/2006 - 11:48pm.

No doubt an experienced public servant does know how to get and legally use such funds BUT, Who pays the insurance on the helicopter(s), the Charger? Who pays the up-keep? Who pays for the pilots (I ass-u-me they make more than patrol officers)? Who pays for the hanger? AND, what happens if the department hits a dry spell and there ain't no mo'money? Again, I say it's a mis-guided national drug policy.

Submitted by Fayetteresident on Wed, 03/01/2006 - 1:16pm.

You don't have to be an EXPERIENCED public servant to know how to follow the law! The funds HAVE TO BE USED TO ENHANCE LAW ENFORCEMENT needs. Your "accusations" are unnecessary and out of line!

"Who pays for the pilots?" I BET YOU DIDN'T KNOW that several of the Deputies have gone to school to be certified pilots! The county is getting TWO FOR ONE! As for the insurance and up-keep, the Drug Funds pay for those! Why is the helicopter such a big issue?

"What if the department hits a dry spell?" There's no doubt that with attitudes like yours, crime and drug traffic will continue to be on the rise!

Again, with "friends" like you, who needs enemies? Why not try to be part of the solution instead of part of the problem?

Submitted by bladderq on Tue, 02/28/2006 - 7:15pm.

You know what I see? Lost tax $$$$. The story admits that the police catch only a small part. We have embarked on a mis-guided drug policy for too many years (40+). All we have gotten is a bulging prison system, ruined lives, families; yes, lack of respect for the police. If legal drugs cause crime, why isn't Amsterdam more dangerous than Atlanta?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.