Why Obama is worse than Tiger

Joe Kawfi's picture

Every day that President Obama pushes for the government take over of health care he injures families by the thousands across America. Every day that President Obama contemplates the idea of spending trillions more of yours and my tax dollars, the less the chances of his being able to reduce the non-voluntary unemployment/under-employment rates that are now drastically impacting one out of every five families in America. (By comparison at President Bush's jobs crisis peak - only one out of every fourteen families were impacted.) And by refusing to seriously address the need for job creation, and by invoking ridiculous and silly propositions like "jobs saved" the President demonstrates a callousness not to one injured spouse, but to an aching nation.

Why Obama is worse than Tiger

Joe Kawfi's blog | login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Mon, 12/14/2009 - 5:33am.

If the press would spend as much time as they did on Tiger picking apart the Acorn administration and the many flaws in the health care bill and Obama's motivation for getting it passed quickly (although it won't take effect until after his supposed 2012 reelection) we would not be having any debate about this in Congress. Only the real nutcases on the left (about 12 of them) would be pushing this abortion of a bill (pun intended).


Submitted by Bonkers on Mon, 12/14/2009 - 7:46am.

You must be joking!
I have never seen so much discussion anywhere as I have seen about the new health plan!
TV is loaded--night and day; newspapers (including Citizen columnists) loaded; talk radio---loaded.

What is a flaw is opinion!
The final bill hasn't passed yet!
If you don't want an abortion don't have one and turn in for insurance!
Acorn doesn't get any more donations than does The Heritage Foundation!

One thing nut cases have in common is that they call everyone else nut cases who disagree!

S. Lindsey's picture
Submitted by S. Lindsey on Mon, 12/14/2009 - 9:41am.

...is that they call everyone else nut cases who disagree!"

Even a blind squirrel will find a nut every now and then..

"Acorn doesn't get any more donations than does The Heritage Foundation!"

Donations you may be right but somehow I doubt it.. But just how much taxpayer funds does the Heritage group get?

$5.2 billion in taxpayer funds to Acorn.

"A little matter will move a party

but it must be something great that moves a nation.

~Thomas Paine"


Submitted by Bonkers on Mon, 12/14/2009 - 1:13pm.

Here is where you either learn something or have been hiding it!

Donations to Many, many of these conservative causes is TAX DEDUCTIBLE!

That is the same thing as getting Tax money!

S. Lindsey's picture
Submitted by S. Lindsey on Mon, 12/14/2009 - 1:58pm.

If you equate Donations to the FORCEABLE TAKING OF TAXPAYERS DOLLARS to give to the like of ACORN.

But go ahead show me which "Conservative causes" are tax-deductable.

"A little matter will move a party

but it must be something great that moves a nation.

~Thomas Paine"


Submitted by Bonkers on Mon, 12/14/2009 - 2:32pm.

IF YOU WANT TO SEE:
MYHERITAGE.ORG/DONATE/

Please don't waste my time.

Next you will want to know what Heritage does with their tax deductible donations!

The Wedge's picture
Submitted by The Wedge on Mon, 12/14/2009 - 1:54pm.

On what planet is a direct line item expenditure to the Federal Annual Budget - re: Acorn, counted the same as a tax deduction as far as funding and tax money? Money is not allocated from the federal government to any of these tax deductible entities. So Bonkers, if you claim a mortgage deduction on the standard 1040A, is that the same as receiving tax money? Really? How are you receiving tax money for that? If it doesn't show up as a line item in the federal budget, then it is not the same as receiving tax money. And by the way, Acorn gets it both ways- direct tax money and any contributions from individuals get a tax deduction to a certain level. Tell me again how that is equal to the Heritige group? Purblind clod


Submitted by Bonkers on Mon, 12/14/2009 - 2:36pm.

Look, if the government gets less tax money due to Heritage, etc., donations---don't they get it from somewhere else? Like you?

Acorn works for under-privileged (and of course themself; Heritage works for high end tax payers!

The Wedge's picture
Submitted by The Wedge on Mon, 12/14/2009 - 3:09pm.

Look, if the government spends less tax money due to eliminating ACORN funding, then they would not have to get it from somewhere else-namely me. Acorn works as a recruitment wing of the DNC and possibly even more leftist and marxist organizations. They also will help you set up some illicit industries for you if you would like.
A tax deduction at an average of 8% of the contribution is not even in the same order of reality that is a direct expenditure of the federal government. Do you have a Che Guevera nightie, or what? once again purblind clod


Submitted by Bonkers on Mon, 12/14/2009 - 6:07pm.

I don't know where you got the 8%.

One multimillion donation to Heritage would give them more money than the entire few million ACORN got!
Certainly would cheat the government out of mucho bucks of taxes also.

We need to stop this simple argument---comparing train loads of money to a pauper's penny!

Is ACORN more crooked than AIG? Citigroup? Wells Fargo? GM? Chrysler? Bank of America? These dudes haven't paid any taxes for years and they all got a Trillion loan total. We ain't never gonna get most of that back with interest.

I know you hate to see uppity minorities get anything!

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Mon, 12/14/2009 - 6:49pm.

We need to stop this simple argument---comparing train loads of money to a pauper's penny!

Uncle Joe...I'm not comparing anything to a pauper's penny. I'm trying to help people wrap their minds around just 'what is' a trillion dollars as you Democrats prepare to throw out two more of them under the guise of "Stimulus". In thinking about this however, I find it amazing that people like you really don't want the American people to understand what a Trillion Dollars looks like in real life.

Is ACORN more crooked than AIG? Citigroup? Wells Fargo? GM? Chrysler? Bank of America?

Well the answer is No Bonky...not "more crooked"..... Just AS crooked.

I was always an advocate of letting these corrupt and failed businesses go down so the well run businesses could pick up the worthy crumbs and run with it. Same with ACORN... Here we have our government propping up this corrupt and shameless organization.

So to answer your question... Looks like ACORN is being treated equally to that of these other crooks you made mention of while none of the scoundrels are even going to jail other than Bernie Madoff. Hell...look at the tax cheat crook running the Treasury Department. Do you approve of that Bonky? I guess you have warm fuzzies with the tax cheat Geithner and Charlie Rangle writing tax policy. But ignore them.... Cheney and Bush are out there somewhere for you to trash on.

I know you hate to see uppity minorities get anything!

Up yours Uncle Joe. That comment from someone who can't take his eyes of the FOX babe's legs and his hands off Lil Nellie.

Question: What is the last thing Nellie told Uncle Joe after being intimate? Roll off Uncle....yer squishin my Marlboro's.

Shame on you Bonker$

Obama.... The Bernie Madoff Of Washington


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.