Here is some News you can use..

NIPCC debunks the AGW Crowd..Link

An appendix to the book contains the names of more than 31,400 American scientists – nearly 10,000 of whom hold Ph.D.s in their fields – who have signed a petition to the U.S. government that declares, “There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.”

"A little matter will move a party

~Thomas Paine"

"Sea ice extent averaged over October 2009 was 7.50 million square kilometers (2.90 million square miles). This was 1.79 million square kilometers (691,000 square miles) below the 1979 to 2000 mean for October, but 730,000 square kilometers (282,000 square miles) above the record low for the month, which occurred in October 2007."

A few Dissenters..Link

scientists-make-their-anti-global-warming-case

Global Warming Facts..Real FACTS and Real DATA..Link

Please note: the views and opinions expressed in these Studies and articles are the expressed opinion of mine and now a Majority of Scientist and Americans.

Do you believe that human activities are behind temperature increases?
No 63%
Yes 31%
I'm not sure 6%

Total Votes: 36,869
Pew Poll results

"A little matter will move a party

~Thomas Paine"

As usual, follow the money. It goes back to oil companies more often than not, even regarding the MIT dude, Richard S. Lindzen. And I could not find those particular Pew Poll results, not that I doubt those numbers for that particular question, which I did not find either.

To use denial of global warming as an excuse to do nothing about the pollutants that are being put into the only climate that we have is unconscionable to me. If it is just a matter of making sure that Al Gore does not make any money from the cap and trade system, that could be handled separately.

It's not easy being the carbonunit

I find it interesting that it is a liberal/conservative camp for wether to believe in anthropegenic global warming or not. What used to be called AGW has been changed to climate change. Obviously the climate has changed throughout history. We are not even close to determining how it changes from season to season, or why the little ice age happened in the 1400-1700's. We now see behind the curtain of "consensus scince" and see that it is cudgel consensus.
The money for East Anglia CRU, IPCC, and others of the AGW camp flows just as easily as it does for oil. It is in the form of grants, subsidies, and liberal groups. What is the aim of these groups if it is already decided that we cannot really stop climate change and there is no expectation that the other worlds of India and China will do any heavy lifting?
do you pay attention to the scientific debate or merely the talking points of the DNC? I am curious as there are reams of data to make judgements upon.

do you pay attention to the scientific debate or merely the talking points of the DNC? I am curious as there are reams of data to make judgements upon.

It does pay to pay attention. Fortunately, I do not suffer from the paralysis of analysis. My point is that it is a good thing to curtail, and then reduce, pollution, period. I find the argument about global climate change amusing when I don't find it idiotic. What is lacking in this debate is the concept that both sides could be wrong.

It's not easy being the carbonunit

Nowhere in the past millennium or four have people thought that carbon dioxide is a pollutant. Of the greenhouse gases labeled as such, water vapor is the biggest, methane next as far as a forcing agent per mole, and then carbon dioxide. Our respiration outtake and a tree's respiration intake should not be considered pollution. Let's work on methane, it is easier and has a bigger impact per mole. Since nothing breathes methane, lets go after that one. Even AGW skeptics would agree. Consensus here we come.

And then let's figure our if a warmer climate is bad. Why would it be bad if growing seasons were extended?

Just look outside.. It proves it.. Man-Made Climate change.. Nah bunch of JUNK SCIENCE.

To look at the data that Global "WARMING" is actually decreasing and just ignore it for a POLITICAL feel good moment is ludicrous at best at worst ignorant.

To wreck our economy while excusing China and India from having to comply is well let's just say Anti-American at best.

"A little matter will move a party

~Thomas Paine"