Sonny Perdue had a law written that only he qualified for so he could get $100,000 in tax breaks. When he was asked how others could gain a $100,000 tax break, he responded, "Get yourself elected governor.". What a filthy crook. I cannot believe Georgians would vote for such a corrupt person.

Didn't he have a lodge in the NY mountains for him and his paramour? State troopers did the driving and protecting.
It is common for those high strung dudes. Drove poor old Mr. Speaker Richardson nuts! Sonny was crying over it.

mini wearing, cleavage exposing young things on the news will send you down this same slippery slope. BTW, who is Juliani???

The worst is yet to come: Unemployed Americans should hunker down for more job losses

"So we can expect that job losses will continue until the end of 2010 at the earliest. In other words, if you are unemployed and looking for work and just waiting for the economy to turn the corner, you had better hunker down. All the economic numbers suggest this will take a while. The jobs just are not coming back."

Yep, that 787 billion in Stimu-pork really did the trick Mr. President - way to go!!

LIBERALISM: The triumph of mindless, wishful thinking over logic, reason, and experience.

I believe my favorite lie posted was attributed to the amazing recovery in Talladega County, Alabama. It claimed they saved or created 5,000 jobs...get this though, from only $42,000 in government money. If you do the math, that would mean if all 5,000 made the same income it would be $8.40 annually. Now, I know the cost of living is cheaper in rural Alabama and all that, but.....

The interesting thing is the Chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, a DEMOCRAT, is calling out the Obama administration on this. Rep. David Obey called the inaccuracies "outrageous" and the administration owes the American public "a commitment to work night and day to correct the ludicrous mistakes".

Huge props to Ed Pound, the communications director for the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board though. He said the mistakes were caused by human error. He said "We report what the recipients submit to us". Nice.....

How many of the 13 million out of work did Bush LOSE?

The last count I saw was Bush was responsible for 24 of them. However, it is a little difficult to determine since you and all the other Obama APOLOGISTS refuse to decide/admit when Barry's term actually began.

Who is Barry? Is that the President?

Well, since he doesn't have a suitable birth certificate, he really isn't serving as yet!

The President didn't bring any of these people out of work with him---none! You know that.

You won't get any disagreement from me when you state Obama isn't serving yet.

Having said that, here are the pertinent facts:

Barry's term started Jan 20, 2009 (deal with it).

Unemployment was at 8.1% when he took office.

It is now at 10.2%.

His jobs saved and created claims are BS and are being proven so. (I noticed you didn't address the point of the post. You just went into but, but, but, Bush......)

Keep trying to spin that like a good little Democrat sycophant.....

Talking about avoiding the subject!

What the devil difference does it make how many jobs have been saved?

Bush actually saved some of his own creat5ion by bailing out the banks. If they had all shut down, havoc would have been immediate instead of gradual as is happening.

Shouldn't we be working together on this to stop the continued degradation of jobs and bank operations?
How can you think any thinking person thinks Obama caused all of this unemployment---makes NO sense!

He is trying to save Bush's A..

You said he was responsible for the difference in 8 and 10% unemployment!!
If you didn't say that what did you mean?
He didn't bring any jobs or unemployment with him in January!
Solving eight years of catastrophe can't be done immediately!!

Stop blaming democrats until they have a chance.
If you don't, then suggest what they should be doing, to immediately solve the problems.

This crap isn't worth arguing.

Oh no, it doesn't work like that Bonker$. You can't blame Bush for everything in the previous 8 years and then say all the current problems happening in this administration are none of Barry's doings. His "policies" are speaking for themselves, much to your liking and to my side's dismay. The clock has been on for his term since Jan 20th whether you want it to be or not.

"Stop blaming democrats until they have a chance."

Oh, I've been admiring the sparkling results from the Democratic controlled Congress for quite some time now. Really impressive....

"This crap isn't worth arguing."

Then, like I told you before old man.....don't respond to my posts. Especially with losing arguments. Easy as that....

"What the devil difference does it make how many jobs have been saved?"

Because they are lying about the recovery and they know it. Besides, gullible fools like you believe their BS or don't care if they are being BS'ed. Which is the case with you?

"How can you think any thinking person thinks Obama caused all of this unemployment---makes NO sense!"

I never said one time that Obama caused all of this unemployment. I specified the numbers when he took office and now. Anyone with a brain (which obviously excludes you) can see the difference.

"He is trying to save Bush's A.."

Now you just show what a fool you are. Barry is trying to do a lot of things. But, nowhere on that list is saving Bush's A$$. Besides, after his start he'd better be concerned with his own A$$.

This is the most transparent administration in the US history. Also, aboslutely no lobbyists will be employed. No criticism will be brokered. None at all to this administration. As clean as the Ivory Snow girl- oh wait, she wasn't that clean, was she? How is that going, there Boinkers, you septuagenarian dim bulb, you

Pay NO attention to the man behind the curtain - even if he does look like David Axelrod or Nancy Pelosi (wow, there's a mental picture!)