No, he's not the one. Read up on it here:
http://www.thecitizen.com/node/26874

he IS the one. I am aware of your reference listed from March. I was at the Council meeting on the 6th of this month and when Mr. Cree was speaking, he spoke of an incident just recently at a house a few houses down from his. He mentioned a doctor and the name sounded like Jaleel. Do you know if either of the persons named in your reference article are doctors? He was not talking about a fence out of compliance at the meeting, he was talking about a break in and/or slashed tires.

What revision? There was NO vote to revise the 4' height limit on fences. The vote was on whether to investigate whether a change in fence height was justified in light of security concern since the original ordinance had been established 15 - 20 years ago. There was never a motion in place to approve any change. Get the facts right! Huge difference between approving a review of an ordinance and a change in an ordinance.

Just how do you change an ordinance without a review of the existing ordinance? Please tell me. And why would we WASTE city staff time telling them to do a review if there is no intention of revising (or changing) an ordinance? Do you have a clue how limited our city staff is? How many we have laid off or cut back AND not given raises to?

Is this one 2 foot height issue so all-consuming critical to the welfare of the population here? Do you just think maybe this could be put at about number 100 on a scale of 1 to 100 to get taken care of in this economy and at an election time and during a 3.5 million dollar budget shortfall?

The fact is, Cyndi had a chance to speak up and say NO, the needs of the many outweigh the wishes of the few right now. Instead, she again voted without taking the whole issue into account. Or the cost involved. Or the time involved.

And need I repeat my above post, asking her when did the only other party mentioned in this request to Council, contribute to her campaign?

Is this how we are going to vote by whoever inserts the most signs in the ground? Look at the credentials and see where you want our city moving forward! Try reading AHAVAH. Who cares if Mr. Haddix does not stand at a street corner waiving or not. Try reading and gathering information to make an educated decision and not ASS u ME what Mr. Haddix felt or was thinking! You owe it to our city!

it is obvious that mr haddix has been advised to say and do nothing since he is practically elected.

if he did he might mess up!

may be good plan.

Look at both records and decide for yourself. Do you want big box stores, more congestion, and higher crime rates or do you want the original planned community? You have a voting record to look at so check it out! Looking at the records, Mr. Haddix seems like he will take us down the path of the original plan of A COMMUNITY.

I'll take something much closer to what we have now. Why in the world would you want DOUBLE the people we have now?

Peachtree City reached the list of best places to live not in 1989, not in 1999, but rather in 2005 with a population of 31000 and again in 2009 with a population of 34000 – growth was part of the equation to being a best place to live. The one thing guaranteed is that Peachtree City will experience continued growth pressures. Change is pervasive and non-stop, and city must be proactive and manage the borders and infrastructure through intelligent mangement of very limited resources. Putting up a gate or rolling up the carpets is unrealistic and plainly irresponsible - time doesn't usually move backwards. Most importantly, it is critical to attract the demographic of the 30 – 50 somethings, who bring in high wages, education which attracts clean industry and culture, and generally provides for low crime rates, good schools and minimal use of public safety resources. For those hung up on the plan, let’s not forget the original plan of 85,000, or the second or third renditions. The message is a plan is a fluid document intended to be changed to reflect the demographics, the economy and technology. It is not a holy grail. This concept of stepping back in time is an unlikely dream. Previous Councils have given away the store. All the big boxes in PTC were here 4 years ago - this did not happen under the "terrible" three of Logsdon, Plunkett, Boone. So, yes, lets look at the voting record and I suspect you will find that there has been a distortion of truth - but not from Plunkett, but rather from Mr. Bloggesphere himself.

The original plan for PTC called for a much higher population density, many more apartments and more lower end housing.
And the Big Box stores are already here, they came in under the previous two administrations (in fact I don't think a single Big Box has been built under the last watch). Don may have a chance to stop or alter McMurrain's plans (but I don't think so) for the Kohl's development but then they would just build a strip center with more stores that we don't need.

Thank you about speaking the truth regarding the Big Box development of Highway 54 West....

People need to read the truth at

http://cyndiplunkett.com/

The truth about Cindy is she has voted in too many 3/2 votes to allow variances and goodies for development. It is time for her to be voted out of office. No council, no mayor. Compare voting records. Quit spamming. I can do it too

There is no real content on that website. Bottom line there is no defense for her voting record.

Is this how we are going to vote by whoever inserts the most signs in the ground? Look at the credentials and see where you want our city moving forward! Try reading AHAVAH. Who cares if Mr. Haddix does not stand at a street corner waiving or not. Try reading and gathering information to make an educated decision and not ASS u ME what Mr. Haddix felt or was thinking! You owe it to our city!

Please don't assume that I haven't read and haven't looked at voting records. Doing so will only make you look foolish. I have chosen my candidate based on who I feel will do the best job. I was merely pointing out what I felt to be a more personable candidate. I did not mean to insinuate either that Mr. Haddix did not desire the job, because I believe it is very obvious that such a statement would be falsehood.

Ahavah

"Despite treason after treason, and sabotage after sabotage, God's empire of light never falls into total eclipse. Satan wages a futile war."

Try well over 100 with more being requested every day.

Don Haddix
Candidate for Mayor
DonHaddix.com