Wilkerson was Republican before it was cool

Tue, 02/21/2006 - 4:51pm
By: Letters to the ...

On Feb. 15, the Republican Party held its forum for the Republican candidates running for County Commission Post 1 between Emory Wilkerson, Robert Horgan and Malcolm Hughes. The debates were very informative, not only to the group of citizens who came to listen, but interestingly so, to the candidates themselves.

Before any candidate arrived, I carefully reviewed each politician’s recent voting history and then made copies of those records to give out at the meeting. I was intrigued by what I found and I believe the voters of Fayette County should find some true value in those facts as well.

What the candidates learned was that their voting records are public records. Although the actual voter’s decision is unknown, the record will reflect if the voter voted in a Democratic or Republican primary, or whether they took the time to vote at all.

What the actual voting records told me about these three candidates was noteworthy.

1. Robert Horgan had NOT VOTED in more than 30 percent of the elections held since 1998.

When asked about this voting record, Mr. Horgan honestly said that he was “suprised” such records were kept. He knew that he was in a tough spot. He never explained why he failed to excercise his right to vote, perhaps because he had no excuse. I believe that he knew that it was disingenuous for him to ask others to vote for him after it was learned that he failed to even vote himself.

Is it not ironic that Mr. Horgan would expect that we should entrust him to vote on important county commissioner issues, when he himself has failed to exercise that right for himself? Will he only vote 70 percent of the time if elected county commissioner? We have men and women fighting in Iraq to help give democracy to the Iraqis. It’s a life and death decision just to go to the polls in Iraq, and yet, an actual candidate in Fayette County fails to vote in almost half of the elections?

2. Mr. Horgan also said that he would often vote for the candidate and not the party. This cliche is often cited by candidates who don’t want to be held accountable for their political beliefs. The records shows that Mr. Horgan had actually voted in prior Democratic primaries. He attributed his votes for Democrats to be evidence of the “influence that his Democratic parents had on him.” He never explained why or how he decided to now become a full-fledged Republican, only that we should vote for him because he was one of us, now. Mr. Horgan could have run as an independent, but he chose to be part of a party that he himself has failed to support in the past.

3. Malcolm Hughes voted in at least two Democratic primaries and has missed the vote in prior elections.

He explained that his vote for the Democratic presidential candidate in 2002 — i.e., John Kerry, John Edwards, Al Sharpton, et al — was because George Bush was not the kind of CEO America needed ”economically.” He believed we needed a Democrat to replace the current CEO, George Bush.

He explained that the other Democrats he voted for in other Democratic primaries were just his personal friends. But he assured us he was a fiscal conservative, regardless of whether he votes for Democrats or not.

4. Emory Wilkerson’s voting record contrasted remarkably from the other candidates.

Unlike the other candidates,
a. Emory had never voted in any Democratic primaries while Horgan and Hughes had.

b. Emory has never missed a chance to vote since moving to Fayette. Horgan and Hughes have.

c. Emory was the only dues-paying Republican Party member (although Mr. Hughes paid his first dues to the party that night, while Mr. Horgan stayed strangely quiet, keeping his wallet in his pocket).

d. Emory has actually run as a Republican candidate for the state House before, while Horgan and Hughes have not.

e. Emory had served on numerous Republican committees, attended numerous Republican conventions and had served on the local Republican Party Executive Board as first vice-chair. Mr. Horgan and Mr. Hughes have never been seen before at any Republican event, especially fund-raisers, until they both announced their candidacy for public office.

The final straw was a question that was posed to all of the candidates: How many county commission meetings had they attended before they decided to run to be a commissioner?

While Emory Wilkerson had been to numerous county commission meetings, Mr. Horgan could only remember having attended “city council meetings” to get his business license approved years before; and Mr. Hughes only gave a generic answer that he has shown up to a variety of different political meetings over the years and he had no idea how many commission meetings he had attended.

My quick straw poll of our current county commissioners showed that only Emory had ever actually attended any of their official meetings, which explains Horgan’s and Hughes’ non-answers. I strongly suspect that neither Mr. Hughes or Mr. Horgan have ever been to a single county commission meeting, and yet they now want to be elected to become one. They probably believe in on the job training as well.

The difference at the forum was clear. Emory Wilkerson has been a Republican long before being a Republican in Fayette was cool. Emory has a proven voting history and has been a proud, and strong, and involved Republican long before he announced his decision to run for this office.

Mr. Horgan and Mr. Hughes appeared overnight, like magic. Both were talking the talk, but neither has ever walked the walk.

Perhaps one day, Mr. Horgan and Mr. Hughes will work hard within the community and within the Republican Party before they decide they want to run again as a Republican candidate.

Fayette Countians expect more and deserve more. We have a wonderful community that needs honest and loyal stewards who have shown a history of conservative and consistent voting. We do not need any “Johnny come latelys.” We need true Republicans.

The time has come for Emory Wilkerson to be the Republican County Commissioner from Post 1. We don’t need to split our vote with two other newbie Republicans and then give the Democratic candidate a chance to sneak in under the radar screen.

I’m asking all Fayette County Republicans to come together behind the only proven and dedicated Republican running in this race, Emory Wilkerson.

Richard Hobbs

Hobbs is an attorney in Fayetteville and a member of the Fayette County Board of Elections.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by CherokeeKid on Fri, 02/24/2006 - 3:54pm.

I couldn't agree more with Mr Hobbs' assessment of the Republican candidates. We need a true Republican to serve on the commission and Emory is that man. All those that care about this county and love living here, I am asking you to vote for Emory Wilkerson March 21. He'll do us proud.

Another reason to vote for Emory? Emory is Virgil Fludd's worst nightmare. He is everything Virgil is not, a conservative Republican, a well spoken man, a uniter, an inclusive leader who is well thought of in the community. We elect Emory commissioner and it will shut "Elmer" down. He and his crowd of malcontents (Alice and John Jones, et al) won't have a real issue to push in their racially polarizing campaign of we aren't getting our "fair share" and aren't "represented" (whatever that means) Their real agenda, folks, is getting a liberal Democrat elected, preferably a black one.

The day Alice and Virgil start being concerned about the plight of the Republicans in south DeKalb County not being "represented" by Cynthia McKinney will be the day I start giving a rat's behind about their so called plight of not being "represented" in north Fayette County.

See you all at the polls March 21!

Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Thu, 02/23/2006 - 7:44am.

Makes sense to me. I'll vote for him. I don't think the fact that someone did or did not vote in a Democratic or Republican primary several years ago is all that relevant, in fact I don't think it is appropriate for anyone to have access to those records, but it is obviously legal and in our information-crazed society it is not surprising that those records will be used for any purpose.

Instead Wilkerson will get my vote because he has showed up at county commission meetings before he knew he'd be running for a post and has studied the real issues and has real positions instead of the "want to make a difference" position of most candidiates. He has met with Greg Dunn to discuss the issues and has Mr. Dunn's private support.


Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Thu, 02/23/2006 - 10:02am.

But I disagree about voting records not having anything to do with it. I do feel that someone that doesn't excercise their right to vote needs to be questioned very thoroughly. I've always heard, and believe, if you don't vote, don't complain, at least I won't listen to their complaints.

The fact that they voted Democrat is telling also. The populace can make of that what they will. There is no way to tell who someone voted for, only if they voted & when, and if it was a Dem or Pub primary vote.

ptctaxpayer's picture
Submitted by ptctaxpayer on Thu, 02/23/2006 - 11:39am.

I agree with the Dawg. Voting records are useful and they are public. Bobby just doesn't like the fact that we can see that he voted in a Democrat primary, meaning probably for Algore. Maybe his support of Emory will be his maiden voyage into conservative politics. Come join our breakfasts, Bobby, and meet Emory.

Back to Emory. The humorous part is that race is not a factor. Emory is a conservative professional in a conservative company. He has a big investment in his family. He will be reliable. Emory will prove that a black Republican can win in Fayette County but a white Democrat cannot. State Rep. Elmer Fudd doesn't get it.


H. Hamster's picture
Submitted by H. Hamster on Thu, 02/23/2006 - 8:02pm.

Voting as a Democrat or not voting at all is inexcusable in Fayette County. And for sure it is a good thing that this campaign is not going to be racial. Emory is a good conservative Fayette County citizen. Maybe after he's elected, the few remaining black Democrats will switch to the Republican side.


mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Wed, 03/01/2006 - 8:05pm.

You say you don't want the campaign to be racial, but you make racial comments after that. I'll vote for Emory as well, but it won't help because Horgan - who is white - will get most of the votes from the other districts - because he is white. I don't think that is right, but it is what will happen.
meow


Submitted by CherokeeKid on Thu, 03/02/2006 - 2:37pm.

First of all, just who are you referring to about making "racial comments"? If memory serves me correctly, I believe you were the one that tried to say that someone making the comment that Robert Horgan had never "darkened the door" of a county commission meeting or Republican Party meeting prior to running was a racial comment (Which is true by the way, he never did). I think your judgement about what constitutes a "racial comment" is all wet, frankly.

Second, I appreciate the fact that you are voting for Emory, like me, but exactly on what basis are you making this assertion that Horgan is going to get "most of the votes" from the other districts, simply because he's pigmentally challenged (aka white)? Do you have some super secret polling data from CBS or something? I dont see this groundswell of support for Horgan in the county that you must see.Granted, there will be those that won't vote for Emory because he's black, just like some blacks wont vote for Horgan because he's white. I'm not totally naive enough to believe that those old prejudices are gone. But 95% of the people I talk to on a daily basis are voting for Emory.These are white as well as black people. Wilkerson is plugged into the community and is reaping support for that reason. He's a known quantity and many of the movers and shakers in the county are backing him and proudly so.In short, they are voting for the man and the content of his character, not the color of his skin. These are the people that will be going to the polls on March 21. I think you will be pleasantly surprised come election day.

See you all at the polls March 21!

mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Thu, 03/02/2006 - 7:59pm.

No racism or even personal preferences here, guy. Simply a prediction. I don't agree with the way this will end - obviously since I support Emory and have contributed to his campaign. But, what will happen is that Robert Horgan and Emory Wilkerson will be in a runoff election 2 or 3 weeks after the general election - probably during spring break which will result in an extremely light turnout and a close win for for Horgan. Reason is the white folks who in public "claim" no racism will privately vote for the white guy every time. That's why the district voting idea came up - not to automatically elect black candidates, but to prevent whites from controlling the process through their non-thinking, latently-racist, default position which is always vote for the white guy.

Again, I don't like this at all. I will vote for Emory Wilkerson - not because of his race, but because of his qualifications. And my prediction that he will come in second in the runoff stands - and that makes me sad for our county.
meow


Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 7:48am.

While everything else you say is true and right - especially your support of Emory, your conclusion is wrong. Yes there will be a lighly attended turnout for the runoff bewteen Emory and Robert, but Emory will prevail beacause he will work harder and gain the support of the other candidates who will not be in the runoff. He may even win big. I really hope so.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.