-->
Search the ArchivesNavigationContact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
Brown’s critique of Thompson challengedTue, 09/22/2009 - 3:21pm
By: Letters to the ...
Several months ago I wrote an article in The Citizen in which I used a business model and some analogies to explain my position on local government and how it should operate. The general summation of the article was that local/city government should be run like a business whereas the citizens take on the role much like that of a stockholder in a company. The fact is that local taxes are unlike any other taxes we pay as citizens in this country. Local taxes are the only taxes we pay, as citizens, which can benefit us directly and immediately. Handled with knowledge and responsibility our local/city taxes can positively affect our quality of life and can have an immediate effect on us financially, for example, by an increase in home values. Unlike our federal or state taxes, local taxes impact us in ways we can actually see and feel, immediately. In fact I think there should be a different name for city paid taxes because it really isn’t a tax in the true sense of the word. Under the right type of leadership it is nothing short of an investment for a better quality of life. In regards to my previous article I received numerous phone calls, compliments from many of my health club members, and even two letters in the mail. All were very positive and in agreement with my intended message. I state this for the simple reason that the positive feedback was short-lived. In a matter of days I was rebutted in The Citizen by our former mayor, Mr. Steve Brown, which in many ways is a compliment, especially in the fact that we don’t seem to agree on too many of the local issues. When Mr. Brown was the sitting mayor, he as an incumbent, running for re-election in 2005, received only 22 percent of the vote. This is not unlike the CEO of a company being voted out by over 78 percent of its stockholders. Can you imagine that scenario? As a matter of fact, the sports complex which Mr. Brown so diligently criticized and opposed was a bond referendum issue in the previous election and received over 5,200 more votes than Mr. Brown received in his bid for re-election. The fact of the matter is simply this: Mr. Brown, you are disingenuous, you speak of things you know nothing of, and you mislead the citizens of Peachtree City with untrue statements. Mr. Brown, as the saying goes, “You are entitled to your own set of opinions, but not to your own set of facts.” In regards to the foregoing quote, in your article you state the following: “I am worried about your sincerity, Mr. Thompson, when you try to buy our tennis center at a fraction of its value for your personal benefit.” Mr. Brown, where do you get your information? This is where you are disingenuous and misleading. I have never tried to buy the Tennis Center and have zero interest in doing so. But I’ll play along for now. Over the years you have contend that the tennis center loses money. Allow me to offer you a simple business lesson, Mr. Brown: If a business loses money it is not worth anything. You later state, “Your sincerity also comes into question when you say our ‘taxes [are] too low to support the quality we all wanted and paid for when we moved here,’ but you push for a referendum to build even more expensive facilities including an ice skating rink and fitness center for your personal financial profit.” Again you mislead our citizens. Allow me to remind you yet again, this referendum received approximately 5,200 more votes than you received for re-election bid as mayor. I often feel like I’m trying to explain high school algebra to someone who is doing third grade math; you don’t seem to get it. I had zero financial interest in the ice and sports complex (other than an immediate increase in my home value along with the other residents of Peachtree City). The issue here is simple: you somehow believe that someone who has worked hard over many years and has been fortunate enough to have some financial success can’t do anything out of the goodness of their heart. It is my personal belief that there are many things in life much more rewarding than money. The fitness center was not part of the referendum, so don’t muddy the waters with that argument either. Furthermore, I’m not sure it would qualify as a fitness center. The last discussions centered on a 5,000-square-foot complex (my current club is 30,000 square feet) with very limited equipment. The intent was to allow parents to have an option to be physically active while their children were on site. The city wanted the guaranteed revenue and thought that it would be of service to the community as parents would save both time and money. Practically, with all sports for our children being at one location, the gas savings alone would far outweigh the cost, not to mention the value, in the time saved driving to only one location. I find it interesting that somehow you think that it’s okay for the taxpayer to spend almost twice the annual cost of the sports complex referendum on an aquatic center that brings in no revenue, and has no economic impact, which you allowed to take place on your watch. But then again I guess that is an example of your business sense coming out once again. Mr. Brown, you continue by saying that, “then-candidate Dar Thompson said, ‘The only difference is that I’m the only candidate who has come up with ideas to help fund these areas without going into your, the taxpayers’, pocket.’” Again, you are being disingenuous and you obfuscate the truth. Don’t mix apples and oranges. Mr. Brown, I will grudgingly give you limited credit as a political huckster, but a business man you will never be. Under my platform, when I ran for mayor, the city would now have brought in approximately $1.3 million more than they have received over the last four years and there would not have been a single individual laid-off at City Hall, period. Unlike some local politicians (past and present), I am not concerned with next Wednesday’s paper or getting re-elected; I am more concerned with doing what is right. You cannot be a part of the solution if you are part of the problem. In closing, Mr. Brown, you state, “But if people started canceling gym memberships at your facilities, you would, according to your logic, keep everything exactly as is and increase the remaining gym membership fees to maintain the same level of service. Right, Mr. Thompson?” Mr. Brown, you are wrong yet again, and you have simply, by your commentary, validated my argument. Because I have run my business responsibly and with a long-term plan, cancellations would not affect my business model whatsoever. I don’t have to entertain that issue because thoughtful people will always pay more for quality and value. We are the highest priced fitness-center in all of Fayette and Cowetta counties. However, our members are more than satisfied, happy because they get what they pay for. Our clubs have consistently ranked in the top 3 percent of health clubs in the United States. My clubs are and continue to be financially strong and we have not released any employees, even during this current ongoing economic downturn. To address your question more directly, unlike City Hall, I have planned well ahead for such events. So the answer is, no, I would not increase membership fees. Mr. Brown, you continue to try and move forward while continually looking in the rear-view mirror. You are simply being negatively reactive instead of positively pro-active. I simply don’t understand you. If, in your opinion, Peachtree City is such a terrible place, why don’t you simply pack up and move to a different community? You are the true politician. You are not solution-based, you are fear-based. You want to make everyone uncomfortable and afraid by telling them what is wrong and who is to blame. Leaders are solution-based: how can we fix it, how can we make it better? This is not unlike a small hole in a boat that is slowly sinking. You are more concerned with who caused the hole than in finding the person who can fix it. When I think of the former Mayor Steve Brown I am often reminded of the movie with Michael Douglas, “An American President.” The scene to which I refer is where Michael J. Fox says, “Mr. President, and in the absence of genuine leadership, they’ll listen to anyone who steps up to the microphone. They want leadership. They’re so thirsty for it they’ll crawl through the desert toward a mirage, and when they discover there’s no water, they’ll drink the sand.” Michael Douglas, playing the part of President Andrew Shepherd, replies: “Lewis, we’ve had presidents who were beloved, who couldn’t find a coherent sentence with two hands and a flashlight. People don’t drink the sand because they’re thirsty. They drink the sand because they don’t know the difference.” Mr. Brown, stop drinking the sand. In summary, allow me to align myself with a quote of Thomas Jefferson, “The man who fears no truths has nothing to fear from lies.” It would behoove you, Mr. Brown, to take the words of Thomas Jefferson to heart. When communicating with the residents of Peachtree City. They deserve no less! Dar Thompson Peachtree City, Ga. [Fitness center owner Thompson has run twice for City Council posts: for mayor against Steve Brown in 2005, and for Post 2 in 2007.] login to post comments |