Lights OK'd for McIntosh practice field

Fri, 09/18/2009 - 1:46pm
By: The Citizen

Peachtree City’s Planning Commission has approved a proposal to erect permanent lights on the practice sports field at McIntosh High School.

School athletic director Steve Cole said the lights were needed to provide additional practice time at night, particularly in the January through March months. With the addition of Lacrosse to the school’s spring sports, scheduling practice time becomes a challenge with soccer and other sports going on simultaneously, Cole said.

Cole said the school has no intention to play games on the field on a regular basis but may need to schedule a few should rainouts become an issue. A few JV and freshman soccer games were played on the field last year, he noted.

Cole said the school is working with Peachtree City-headquartered Cooper Lighting to develop a lighting plan that takes into account homeowners’ wishes not to have light intruding on their homes.

The school is not proposing to add bleachers or any loudspeakers to the practice field. And the school also has committed to having the lights cut off by 9 p.m.

But neighbors still have concerns about the lighting and how it will look.
Christina Abell, who lives right off Walt Banks Road and Southern Trace Court directly across from the practice field, said she has lost several trees to disease that would have buffered the lights from her home. Abell said she wanted to see more specific plans for the lighting but she did not want to oppose the school.

Abell said she is concerned about the lights affecting the potential for reselling her home.

Kathy Swartz, who lives near the field off Peachtree Parkway, said she was concerned about the practice field becoming a playing field in the future with bleachers and loudspeakers. Swartz said she lived in her home when the practice field was first built, and she was concerned with the revelation that the school system technically doesn’t have to comply with any city ordinances or the conditions being developed for the practice field lights.

Although the city had requested the Board of Education to add landscaping after the lights were installed if necessary, school facilities director Mike Satterfield noted the school could only pay to install landscaping on its property. Satterfield said it is possible that the school’s booster club could pay for landscape improvements off the school property though if necessary.

Satterfield said the idea for lighting the practice field initially came from a need for the football team to practice at night or in the morning to avoid 100-plus degree temperatures during the day the first few weeks of school.

The commission’s 3-1 approval, with Joe Frazar voting against, was cached on the remaining details of the memorandum of understanding being worked out between the city, school officials and surrounding neighbors in the next few weeks.

But, as interim Community Development Director David Rast explained, the school board is not required by law to obey any city development ordinance.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by driftwood on Fri, 09/18/2009 - 11:18pm.

Are the booster clubs funding this expense or is the BOE? Since " the school board is not required by law to obey any city development ordinance", one would assume that it is NOT PTC. With the lack of BOE funds (remember we are 12th from the bottom in the state on the "reserve list"),teacher furloughs,and the recent article regarding expected additional state funding cuts, it will interesting to know from exactly where the funds to place lighting will come. I am sure such lighting is not cheap. Anyone got any ideas?

yellowjax1212's picture
Submitted by yellowjax1212 on Sat, 09/19/2009 - 8:50am.

Amen, Driftwood.
Please don't tell me that people have had there pay reduced or lost their job all together and suddenly the BOE has the funds to put lights on a practice field!!!
I understand scheduling issues but I think with the financial status of the BOE, this absolutely sends the wrong message to the teachers, parents and students. Any extra funds available, even if raised by Boosters or other outside sources should to turned back to education first.
Get your financial house in order - then add lights to your practice field.
HOWEVER, speaking of lights on sports fields, has anyone else seen the lights on the Sandy Creek stadium blazing away at 4:00 in the morning. I haven't seen it this school year but it was a regular occurrence last year. I travel 74N every day to go to work and was not unusual to see the place all lit up.


yellowjax1212's picture
Submitted by yellowjax1212 on Tue, 09/22/2009 - 10:01am.

"But, as interim Community Development Director David Rast explained, the school board is not required by law to obey any city development ordinance."

So it doesn't matter what we think. Regardless of how the planning commission would have voted, the BOE is gonna spend "their" money how they darn want to spend it.

I sure all the teachers and staff in Fayette County (and the tax payer for that matter) will rest easy on their mandatory furlough days knowing the the BOE has decided it is necessary to light an athletic practice field.

This is outrageous! I can not believe that the normal blog crowd has been silent on this one.


NUK_1's picture
Submitted by NUK_1 on Tue, 09/22/2009 - 11:12am.

Last election, they all got pretty much a mandate to do whatever they want and an affirmation that gross incompetence is OK. They didn't have serious challengers to your seat, the splost passed, and obviously the voters thought they were all doing a bang-up job. Bloggers seemed to even think that Robert Todd and Marion Key were doing a "fine job" themselves for occasionally bothering to show up at important meetings and saying something that didn't go along entirely with the other 3, even though those two are just as big of a problem as Smola and Smith.

Sometimes it takes some real pain to enlighten people. Well, the BOE has shown that yet again they have been pretty much a disgrace to Fayette Co for a long time, and that started way before now. You take away the parents of this community and you'd have a school system a lot worse than Clayton's. That's how bad the BOE has been for years.


Submitted by driftwood on Tue, 09/22/2009 - 10:26am.

This may be an urban legend, but I thought I heard somewhere (way back when) that the BOE or McIntosh Administration made some sort of an agreement with the surrounding neighborhood that lights would never be placed on the practice field... this "agreement" originated when either the practice field was built or when it was expanded due to concerns by local residents. Not sure on the dates for either. If there was "an agreement", I am sure it was verbal and nothing in writing that would come back to haunt the BOE/McIntosh. Someone let me know if I am wrong.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.