Judge quashes recall

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 4:32pm
By: John Munford

Commissioner Horgan's arrest not connected to official duties; criminal case to be heard

A court ruling Friday quashed the efforts of a citizen’s group trying to get Fayette County Commissioner Robert Horgan kicked out of office.

But the same jurist who ruled in Horgan’s favor may also have handed him another hurdle. Superior Court Judge A. Quillian Baldwin of the Coweta Judicial Circuit said Horgan could be forced to resign from office as a requirement of a probation sentence for misdemeanor possession of marijuana.

Because Horgan’s arrest could not be directly tied to any official duty, Judge Baldwin said that under Georgia law he could not be subject to a recall. The law is different for public officers arrested on felonies, but in this case Horgan is accused of a misdemeanor, Baldwin said.

Judge Baldwin noted that Horgan, who was arrested May 23, was pulled over by a sheriff’s deputy near 6 p.m. on a Saturday when he was driving home from the Fayetteville Lowe’s home improvement store. The initial reason for the stop was that Horgan was driving a truck with an expired auto tag, and he was also cited for that charge.

Horgan was arrested at the scene. According to the deputy’s incident report, Horgan at first said there was nothing illegal in the truck but he later admitted at the scene that he had been smoking marijuana while driving.

The Committee To Recall Robert Horgan had hoped to survive Friday’s court hearing with its initiative intact. Had that occurred, the committee would have needed to secure more than 21,000 signatures of voters who voted in the November election when Horgan was re-elected to office.

Robert Ross of Peachtree City, who has led the recall effort and was the petitioner, has a chance to appeal Judge Baldwin’s decision to the Georgia Supreme Court.

Ross was represented in court by former Fayette County Attorney Dennis Davenport, whose law firm was dismissed as county attorney in 2007 by the current commission. Ultimately the commission chose to use an in-house attorney for most of its legal matters.

Horgan said after the hearing that he felt “a lot better” and was “a little relieved” about the outcome because it saved county taxpayers the cost of a recall election. If the recall were to be approved, it would actually cost the taxpayers two elections, as a separate election would have been required to replace Horgan.

A court date has not been set for the criminal case against Horgan, which includes the misdemeanor marijuana possession charge and also the expired tag charge.

During Friday’s hearing, Horgan’s attorney Christy Jindra argued that Horgan is not alleged to have committed any criminal act directly related to his office.

“Mr. Horgan has not stolen any money, has not misappropriated anything, and has not done anything wrong at any of the meetings,” Jindra said.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
jpopeye's picture
Submitted by jpopeye on Fri, 09/04/2009 - 6:45am.

This was a good news story I did not expect to see. Is it possible that reason is making a comeback?


Submitted by wayne1927 on Wed, 09/02/2009 - 10:50am.

Drank too many beers ,, & drove ??
Drank too many mixed drinks and went and voted on public policy ??
Yea , The guy was smoking a joint on an early Saturday evening , no speeding , no accident , just an expired tag !! In a lot of states the amount of pot this man had is not illegal except the driving part !
Yes he was stupid , He should have refused the vehicle search & made them get a warrant to search , chances are they would not have bothered and this mans life would not be in the mess it is !!
Instead he choose to admit his wrong and take the consequences !!
For this you want to crucify him !!

Submitted by Dondol on Wed, 09/02/2009 - 8:54pm.

In the Great state of Massachusetts if you are caught with an ounce or less it is a written ticket and that's it, just like a speeding ticket. You can show up in court or you have the option to pay it off before hand just like a moving violation.

Obama's weapon of Choice!

Submitted by Bonkers on Wed, 09/02/2009 - 3:13pm.

The millions of alcoholics in the USA don't count. Marijuana smoking is bad like cigarettes except cigarettes are legal and so is alcohol.

It also doesn't pay to be honest with anybody in justice jobs. They will hold it against you forever. Never plead guilty. Lie like crazy you will probably get off!

I've never tried marijuana. I have had a few drinks in my youth.
It depends upon the times---I remember when a woman would be asked to leave church if she had no hat and white gloves.

Submitted by Whiskers165 on Thu, 09/03/2009 - 1:35am.

Do you know anything about marijuana? Studies haven't proven that there are any carcinogens in marijuana smoke. Studies also have proven marijuana has no negative side effects other than the fact that if you smoke it more than once a week or so it slowly coats your fat cells in cannabinoids. That translates into your daily marijuana smokers brain cells being coated. Basically this just slows down brain activity. Doesn't make you dumber or anything, just slows everything way down. I lived that. That's about the only bad part other than it being illegal.

I also smoke cigarettes regularly, about a pack or two a day. Cigarettes kill my appetite, they make me short of breath, they make me feel sick occasionally, they are blackening my lungs, they are giving me cancer, they constrict my circulatory system and if I don't smoke one for a little over a day I get extremely agitated. When I smoked a lot of weed, as in roughly a quarter ounce a day, I just talked really slow and thinking was really hard. Really glad I don't do that anymore

I would argue cigarettes are just bad. Nothing good about them other than the fact that the flavor is good and smoking is a pleasurably experience. Marijuana though, if you use it moderation (some people can't do that, won't deny that because I'm one of them. However a lot of people can use it responsibly, just like how a lot of people can use alcohol responsibly. And alcohol is way worse for the body than marijuana and has the potential to cause a bio-chemical addiction, unlike marijauna) there's not one problem in the world with it, aside from completely unjust laws against it.

ptctaxpayer's picture
Submitted by ptctaxpayer on Wed, 09/02/2009 - 3:57pm.

Bonkie$ never tried marijuana ? Whodathunkit. You're right about the girls. Now they show more leg than a strip joint.


meanoldconservatives's picture
Submitted by meanoldconservatives on Wed, 09/02/2009 - 4:34pm.

To see some leg. All he does is tune into FOX News. He told us so!


Submitted by avgcitizen on Wed, 09/02/2009 - 2:14pm.

Last I checked, marijuana was an illegal substance. Some folks may believe that you can follow some laws and disregard others, but that isn't how the laws are written and that isn't how I'd like to see them enforced. Bob Horgan willingly confessed that he had the illegal drug. So, either he was hoping that they would overlook his crime (a.k.a. good ole boy transaction) or he was willing to accept the consequences of his crime. If you or I (you know... us nobodies) were caught with the same drugs, there wouldn't be any question as to whether or not a law was broken. I think our freedom is just as important as Bob's. Don't you?

Submitted by Spyglass on Wed, 09/02/2009 - 6:14pm.

The next election will be here soon enough, isn't that good enough? Or do you want the hanging at noon?

Submitted by PTC Observer on Thu, 09/03/2009 - 7:44pm.

According to the judge, yes.

He judges the law and laws are as imperfect as the men who create them.

If we don't like them we should go out and change them.

But we discussed this already, right?

Submitted by Spyglass on Thu, 09/03/2009 - 8:07pm.

Speeding through neighborhoods is more dangerous...

That said, it's over. At least in my eyes.

Submitted by PTC Observer on Fri, 09/04/2009 - 1:13pm.

too....

Submitted by Bonkers on Wed, 09/02/2009 - 5:15am.

"Judge assumes guilt of petitioner for upcoming trial!"
"Will go to jail if doesn't resign"

Voice of Fayette Future's picture
Submitted by Voice of Fayett... on Wed, 09/02/2009 - 8:10am.

Judge Baldwin's impartiality is breathtaking. It's as though he said "We gonna have a trial and then we gonna have a hanging." I hope that Judge Baldwin has been ommitted from the middle school civics lecture tour.


Submitted by PTC Observer on Thu, 09/03/2009 - 7:50pm.

Horgan has already admitted guilt (twice, once during the court hearing), the Judge was simply suggesting a rememdy to Horgan's poor judgement. Not a bad idea either.

Submitted by Bonkers on Fri, 09/04/2009 - 5:07am.

Even in cases of plea bargaining or guilt don't people still get a trial and a sentencing?
Or, can we hang him today?

Submitted by PTC Observer on Fri, 09/04/2009 - 1:15pm.

a plea bargin would be what the judge recommended.... he simply leaves office or serves time. Plea bargin....get it?

Submitted by Bonkers on Fri, 09/04/2009 - 2:59pm.

Are you attled?

A judge throws out a case against an official, and then says he can be found guilty another way (hint-hint) by : when yhou give him probation (which you should) make him quit first or go to jail!

"The dude is guilty I just couldn't get it by the appeals court."

Maybe if they told Obama that he could either resign and go free or he could go to jail for trying to speak to our school kids! (so sayeth Justice Roberts!)

Submitted by PTC Observer on Fri, 09/04/2009 - 5:48pm.

I am attled.......

I never fight with an unharmed man.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.