7 PTC businesses busted for underage alcohol sales

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 4:18pm
By: John Munford

Seven Peachtree City businesses were cited by police for alcohol violations after an undercover sting last week.

She’s Bistro, Gezzo’s Surf and Grill, Grinds and Wines, Chili’s, Kane Yama and Peachtree Bottle Shop were cited for furnishing alcohol to a person under 21, police said. Gezzo’s was also charged with selling alcohol without a permit and allowing an employee to serve alcohol without a permit, police said.

The Rite-Aid at Ga. Highway 54 and Peachtree Parkway was also charged with selling alcohol without a permit and allowing an employee to serve alcohol without a permit, police said.

The other 34 businesses were found to be in compliance with city and state alcohol laws, police said.

The undercover sting featured an attempt by a minor to purchase an alcoholic beverage at 41 local bars, package stores, restaurants and pharmacies, police said. It was a joint effort between the Peachtree City Police Department and the Georgia Department of Revenue’s Alcohol and Tobacco Division.

Peachtree City requires all alcoholic beverage servers to file an application for a permit at the police department. The application process includes a criminal background check, and those with a minor alcohol offense must wait two years before they can be approved for a permit; more significant offenses require a five-year waiting period.

The waiting periods are timed from the date of conviction, not the date of the offense, according to city ordinance.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
DarkMadam's picture
Submitted by DarkMadam on Sun, 08/09/2009 - 10:42am.

I have seen some posts around this newspaper that are faulting a particular store for being vigilant about checking I.D's. Well, it seems to me that any good business owner (especially in this economy) would do whatever the law expected to keep their liquor license. After a bit of digging I found that the verbal exchange that took place was instigated by the patron of the store. All started by being asked for identification. I don't really care what the store was selling I know that I would have yelled back. What I would have yelled, truthfully I don't know. But the first words out of my mouth would have been clearly get out of my store. Followed by a call to the police if the first request was not instantly followed, and then a restraining order from my property! Look, the economy sucks right now and everyone is a bit on edge trying to keep their jobs, keep their families in their homes and keep their heads above water. Maybe we all should keep our words sweet because we never know when we will have to eat them. Even I forget this from time to time and I don't think that I am alone. Read all the signs completely before entering any establishment. Usually they will tell you all you need to know about the store. If you don't agree with the signs and a business' right to reserve service to anyone just don't go in. It is just that simple.


Submitted by capecodders6 on Sun, 08/09/2009 - 9:48am.

Seriously, if you think about the consequences of NOT asking for ID, why would you not? Served alcohol for many years and even when enforcement wasn't as strict, I ALWAYS asked for ID -- even of 75-yr-olds, no matter how slammed I was. The law states that anyone who wants to purchase alcohol in the state of GA (& every other state I know of), must show a picture ID, as proof of age to purchase alcohol -- no exceptions, regardless of age. I just cannot fathom giving my time in jail, my money to pay a fine or losing my ability to work for ANYONE, when it's that easy to prevent. Always carry your ID or expect to be turned down!! It's the LAW!

Submitted by Spyglass on Sun, 08/09/2009 - 10:38am.

in my humble opinion. Asking EVERYONE for ID is a huge waste of time and a hassle for everyone involved. IF an establishment wants to have that as a policy, I have no problem with it, but it shouldn't be a state law. We have too many of those as it is.

Submitted by jnizzle on Thu, 08/06/2009 - 10:56am.

They need larger fines that all there is to it....2500.00 or 5000.00

Submitted by Spyglass on Wed, 08/05/2009 - 8:42pm.

it's old enough for me.

Submitted by AtHomeGym on Thu, 08/06/2009 - 3:17pm.

Amen Brother--it was all tied to Highway funding and the states were blackmailed into raising the age to 21. It basically invites and encourages civil and perhaps criminal disobedience. Where is "change" when it is really called for?

borntorun's picture
Submitted by borntorun on Wed, 08/05/2009 - 9:13pm.

Let's see...you can vote for the President of the US, buy a house, buy a car, apply for a credit card, sign a contract as an adult and be held legally responsible for the payment, be prosecuted in a court of law as an adult, get married, have kids, be recognized in any and all other ways as a responsible adult by society and the legal system and oh yeah DIE FOR YOUR COUNTRY but you cannot purchase a beer legally. Give me a friggin' break! And I'm over 50 years old so this isn't some teenage gripe. Stupid law.


Submitted by MYTMITE on Thu, 08/06/2009 - 6:00pm.

beverages comes under ATF. That's the way it was in FL. Now here is a good one----a very well fixed attorney who handled most of the liquor license cases got a very stringent law passed re: serving of alcohol,etc., with very steep fines. Guess who's daughter started a company that charged dearly to come to your establishment and "teach" your servers and bartenders the law. The class was a farce but, if your employees sold alcohol to a minor or a minor bought cigarettes at your establishment you could be heavily fined or could lose your license. If you paid for these classes and your server, bartender got caught, you would not be held responsible because you had this certificate that they had passed the class. Once we got a citation that a minor had bought cigarettes out of a machine in our establishment. The day it was supposed to happen was a slow day and I was there--the machine located where it could be watched and no young people had been in. Our place was a restaurant/tavern. We were not informed at the time it happened but received a form letter about 15 days later stating cigarettes had been bought by a minor. After talking to other establishments we learned that of the ten we called all ten had gotten same letter for same day and same time. When I was finally allowed to talk to the agent (ATF) who supposedly brought this teen-ager in, he had no idea where our machine was even located! The only thing that saved us from a very big fine was that our employees had had this "training." Shake-down, sure seemed like it but there was nothing you could do. We took the cigarette machine out and not too long after became tobacco free just for that reason.

NUK_1's picture
Submitted by NUK_1 on Thu, 08/06/2009 - 8:03pm.

Booze is regulated at the state and local level in GA, not through the ATF. The ATF is kind of a holdover from another era that doesn't do much any more except on firearms issues at times.


Submitted by Tombo100 on Wed, 08/05/2009 - 8:35pm.

We dwell on the negative but it would be great to say 34 of 41 restaurants trained their staff to properly check IDs and passed a grueling undercover sting by Peachtree City Police.

The police department sent a 20 year old that looked 25 into these establishments and they were on top of things enough to determine that the entrapment failed and they were able to successfully follow the law.

And then list these restaurants. Sounds like the Citizen just retyped a press release.

Submitted by Bonkers on Fri, 08/07/2009 - 4:59am.

Isn't that like saying that 34 0f 41 sick people can now have treatment for an illness, isn't that wonderful?
Such a successful program!
We expect the 34 to do the job, don't we? Positivity, Bah!

Submitted by Tombo100 on Fri, 08/07/2009 - 7:52am.

Bonkers

This test is not one that is set up for the businesses to pass. I promise you. The person sent in does not look underage, they are sent at times when servers are the busiest. And lets face it, most restaurants do not have the long term dedicated employees that are as diligent as the owners or management.

If you ask any one of the restaurant owners that passed if they are happy and relieved they would say yes. The opportunity for an error by the servers is huge, and the penalty for the restaurateur is huge.

Submitted by Bonkers on Fri, 08/07/2009 - 8:40am.

Is it OK to not check ages when the restaurant is busy? Just when you have time?

Is it supposed to be set up so one can pass anytime?

How can anyone err when all that needs to be done is to verify by picture i.d. that someone is 21? An annual chart that says what a birthdate means in years old is simple.

Some busy places even ask 75 year olds for i.d. That is the other unneeded extreme! It is usually an excuse for not checking before that they are made to do that!

I'm not so sure about your statement that owners and managers are diligent!

When I was a kid, good, diligent managers used their judgement as to whom to sell alcohol. They helped protect youth. Seldom did the cops interfere for that reason.

matt.barnes's picture
Submitted by matt.barnes on Wed, 08/05/2009 - 9:59am.

This silly alcohol permit thing is turning out to be quite the money maker for the city.


SPQR's picture
Submitted by SPQR on Wed, 08/05/2009 - 9:12am.

PTC police are certainly within their jurisdiction checking on alcohol age compliance. But what's up with Georgia Department of Revenue’s Alcohol and Tobacco Division? As long as the kids are buying tax paid booze why should it be any of their concern?


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.