-->
Search the ArchivesNavigationContact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
BoE wary of shorter school yearTue, 07/21/2009 - 4:33pm
By: Ben Nelms
New state law allows systems to shorten 180-day school year; 1 county goes for 160, with instructional hours staying the same Recent state law changes give Georgia school systems the ability to shorten the number of attendance days as long as total instruction time is maintained. At least one school system in Georgia is moving away from the traditional 180-day schedule to a 160-day school year to save on energy costs. Is a similar move feasible in Fayette County? School board members weighed in on that question after Tuesday’s board meeting. Murray County’s 160-day school year will come by increasing the hours of the school day, thus saving on energy expenses such as diesel fuel used in school buses that get 6-to-7.5 miles per gallon. Murray County would save a reported $124,000 yearly by switching to the 160-day schedule. Though the topic has not surfaced for consideration at a board meeting, Fayette school board members were generally agreeable to exploring the many facets involved with such a departure from the norm. Such a transition could presumably mean a shortened school year or a decrease in the number of days per week that schools are open. “I’m open to exploring it, but I’m not prepared to support it until after we would have a lot more information about what it would mean,” said Chairman Terri Smith. Marion Key agreed in substance, saying that the board does not currently have enough information on the variety of topics included in the discussion but that the school system may need to look at it. Lee Wright commented about the distinctions between school districts and the potential that what works for one school system might not be conducive to another. “One size does not fit all. What might work up in Murray County may not work very well in Fayette County,” Wright said. “There are a lot of concerns you have to look at with working parents and day care and concerns about going away from the traditional five-day a week school year (if a four-day week was considered).” The take on the question by Bob Todd was one that centered on student achievement rather than on financial savings. “Student learning is long-term and sequential. Student attention spans are also somewhat short. To explore the notion of cutting the days would have to take those factors into consideration. And a priority would have to be on the impact on the students, not on how many dollars we save,” Todd said. From her perspective, Janet Smola said the possibility included a range of considerations, from student achievement and the impact on some employees on one hand to the amount of money saved on the other. “The questions are really complicated because I don’t feel like I know what the impact of a longer day would have on the different ages of children as far as their ability to retain information and their test scores goes,” Smola said. “Teachers probably wouldn’t get less pay, but cafeteria workers would, bus drivers would, custodians would. There are just so many missing pieces as far as cost saving and test performance, but I would definitely explore it. It’s absolutely worth exploring and (the legislature) is obviously offering it as an opportunity to try to assist school systems to get a handle on the losses coming from the state. I only hope this doesn’t mean they know there are more (cuts) coming.” login to post comments |