Sgt. Battle arrives amid controversy

Tue, 06/23/2009 - 4:21pm
By: Ben Nelms

Sgt. Battle arrives amid controversy

Maryland charity takes back house built for triple amputee as dispute swirls around homes

Flags have waved, crowds have saluted, and the soldier has come home, but controversy still swirls around Sgt. David Battle, his wife Lakesia, and two handicapped-accessible homes in Georgia that the family may, or may not, have intended to live in.

Battle is a 23-year-old triple amputee who, in December 2007, had part of his body blown off as he served his country in Iraq.

Battle and his family arrived in Fayetteville Saturday on their way to their renovated house off County Line Road just inside the Clayton County line as hundreds of well-wishers lined the way and law enforcement and Georgia Patriot Guard riders led the escort.

It’s the Fayetteville house that set off a national fracas. A charity in Maryland last week withdrew its offer to donate a new home near Washington built specifically for Battle and his family.

The Fayetteville home has recently undergone a complete outfitting of the basement through the efforts of Patriot Guard Riders of Georgia and the contribution of materials and labor by Atlanta’s Parker Young Construction, according to Patriot Guard Riders of Georgia Capt. Michael Louviere.

The controversy involving Battle involves whether ownership of the Fayetteville house violated provisions of the contract Battle signed with Homes for Our Troops in mid-2008 for the charity to raise approximately $800,000 to construct and outfit a 2,400 square-foot house in Maryland.

Speaking Tuesday, Homes for Our Troops President John Gonsalves said the organization works with numerous veterans who have no means of securing property. He said his organization was told by Lakesia Battle that the couple did not own property in Georgia and that the Fayetteville property was owned by her cousin.

Gonsalves added that on the initial application it was noted that the couple would be homeless once David was discharged from the Army. Things changed, said Gonsalves, when he confronted Lakesia recently with evidence that the couple did own the properties.

“In light of what we discussed with home ownership, we felt we had no choice (on the decision to withdraw the offer of the Maryland home),” Gonsalves said. “They would not have been selected if we knew they owned property and it was being rehabbed. She should have told the truth.”

Beyond the issues with the home, and speaking of David Battle as a soldier, Gonsalves said his organization honors everything David has done for his country and that he is glad David has a support system in place.

Commenting on the controversy after he arrived in Fayetteville Saturday afternoon, Battle talked about the $100,000 insurance benefit that all soldiers with injuries such as his receive from the military. In his case, Battle said he and his wife thought it best to invest the money in foreclosure homes to provide a revenue stream for the future. That happened before the Maryland house contract entered the picture.

“We never thought that this good use of the insurance payment would become a problem. Knowing that we would be visiting this area from time to time, the Patriot Guard of Georgia offered to make the basement of this house accessible for me,” Sgt. Battle said. “We did not intend to settle here permanently, as for the next two to three years I still need rehabilitation at Walter Reed (Army Hospital near Washington).”

Battle went on to say he had expected to live in the Maryland house built by Homes for Our Troops.

“But because (Homes for Our Troops) decided that our purchase of investment houses violated their agreement they cancelled our move into this new home,” Battle said, also noting his respect for Homes for Our Troops. “I have the greatest admiration for their work and commitment to a noble cause.”

Maryland residents Dr. Norman Wallis and Inga Guen know David perhaps as well as anyone outside his family. They have come to think of him as a son. During his stay at Walter Reed, Battle — after coming out of a coma — met Karim Peter Guen who, as part of his outreach with the Order of St. John, would spend many days with the wounded soldier. Karim later introduced Battle to his parents, Inga Guen and Dr. Norman Wallis, who live in the area. It was from that point that a friendship and a bond formed.

Speaking of the controversy over the Maryland home, Wallis said a more detailed look at the circumstances might have benefitted both Homes for Our Troops and David Battle.

“I think the best thing they could have done for David and for their organization would have been to delay their decision until they could make a thorough review (of the issues),” Wallis said.

As much as nearly anyone, Inga Guen knows David Battle, the man.

“He’s my very special hero. David is a man of few words and very endearing human being. I saw this beautiful, beautiful young man and fell in love with him,” Inga said. She talked about how the quiet, shy soldier came around to opening up to a stranger that became a friend and of the 100 surgeries he had already endured. “We would talk about what had happened and about his wounds. We talked about his many challenges in the war and the many challenges he faced when he came back to America. David was robbed of a normal life, but I don’t think of him as being disabled. I want to be a constant in his life. I want him to know that he can count on me.”

Unknown to many, said Inga Guen, is that David was raised by his grandmother. She died while he was in Iraq. Inga and David both found a place in each other’s heart, Inga explained in a conversation with The Citizen over the weekend.

“On Mother’s Day this year David said, ‘You care for me like a mother, worry about me like a mother and love me like a mother.’ He had tears in his eyes. I had tears in mine. He said, ‘I am a soldier. I did what I did because this was my job,’” Inga said, her own emotion evident.

That was not the first occasion of a Mother’s Day where Sgt. Battle had made his feeling known for the family that had come to consider him one of their own. It was on that day in 2008 that David, aside from the cookies and chocolate-dipped fruit presented to her on other occasions, gave Inga his Purple Heart. It is gift she carries with her constantly, and will return once his surgeries are complete so that it can be framed and mounted at his home.

Regardless of the controversy over home ownership, Inga and Norman said they continue to count their blessings for having met their hero at Walter Reed, a hero who continues to mean so much in their lives.

It was on Dec. 18, 2007, during Battle’s second tour in Operation Iraqi Freedom that he nearly lost his life. Battle left his M1A2 Abrams tank to clear the area, when he stepped on an improvised explosive device (IED).

He suffered severe wounds resulting in the loss of his right leg and hip and his left leg below the knee. His right arm was later amputated above the elbow. Battle’s internal injuries caused his stomach to be open for three months and he lost a portion of his liver. He was on dialysis for over two months and on life support for three months, according to Patriot Guard Riders of Georgia.

Battle was also in a coma for a portion of his hospital stay and has endured 100 surgeries, with more to come, friends said. Until last week, Walter Reed Army Medical Center had been David Battle’s home since Christmas Day 2007.

In Fayetteville Saturday, somewhere between 400 to 500 people assembled around downtown Fayetteville, along Ga. Highway 54 to Jeff Davis, along McDonough Road at Hwy. 54, at McCurry Park and, finally, in and around the subdivision off County Line Road.

Sgt. Battle is far from finished with the surgeries and rehab at Walter Reed that he will need to put his life in order.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tug13's picture
Submitted by Tug13 on Wed, 06/24/2009 - 8:04pm.

Thanks for writing this soldiers story. Seems to me Sgt. Battle was in no condition to make decisions about the houses and money, now he's paying for the mistakes made by others.
Sgt. Battle you are still a hero in my book. I wish you only the best. I hope you get the care that you need, and deserve from the VA. God Bless you, The Patriot Guard Riders, and Homes For Our Troops.

Ben, I believe there were more than 500 people. Smiling

Tug Smiling


Submitted by hsh87 on Wed, 06/24/2009 - 12:38pm.

First let me say I have complete and utmost respect for Sgt Battle and I was thrilled at the turnout. I honor anyone who stands up and fights for our freedom. In regards to this though, the organization said "...the organization works with numerous veterans who have no means of securing property. He said his organization was told by Lakesia Battle that the couple did not own property in Georgia... that was plain out and out dishonesty. Really he is not to blame, it is his wife who handled this according to the article. They had a means but, as I have experienced numerous other times, she wanted more - someone owed her. They may have bought the houses for investment reasons but there are those who genuinely cannot secure a home and those should be the ones who receive the help. I despise it when people take advantage of charities of any sort. You see so many on welfare and food stamps riding around in their fancy cars and talking on their high dollar cell phones while charities and government programs pay their necessities. This needs to stop. I am glad the Patriot Guard Riders of Georgia did what they did and Ms. Battle needs to see and appreciate the blessing in that.

Submitted by PS1441 on Tue, 06/23/2009 - 9:40pm.

#1 $100,000 does not go very far. Barely a 3 year salary for many. Throw in adaptations in ones living space and vehicles, not much at all.
#2 $100,000 does not cover the loss of limbs.

If he and his wife had invested the $100,000 in stocks, would we be writing articles?

Buying two foreclosures in this market will yield a considerably higher return then any other investment. This is WISE fiscal decision making on their part.

What is the big stink? Modify the Maryland house contract to a $1 lease/let/loan, when therapy is over, they can move out. Another recovering hero at Reed can occupy the adapted house there until he/she moves out.

This is all a tempest in a teapot.

Thanks to all the other local citizens who came out to welcome them home.

Submitted by head_ragg on Wed, 06/24/2009 - 7:11am.

They didn't have to do anything. Ms Battle approached them, not the other way around. They not only told her under what circumstances they normally helped people of their choosing, they gave her written copies to sign. The written copies were to make sure the people seeking to donate were not ripped off.

The fact that when confronted about the houses she said they belonged to her cousin is deceitful at best.

They seem to have a long list of needy vets so there is no reason to make exceptions. Go to the web site and look at their pictures. These are guys in similar situations who don't have anything.

Your agrument is that it was your $100,000. to do with as you pleased. You can't demand a charity give you something. The idea is they can do with their time and money as they see fit. If you can, why can't they?

Submitted by Bonkers on Wed, 06/24/2009 - 5:12am.

This soldier's wife and family had two homes built in two states in violation of the rules of the charity.

I know you and others like you don't fool with rules much and believe in grabbing anything loose, but sometimes it doesn't work!

It has nothing to do with the 100,000 which I'll bet is totally gone now! Those foreclosed houses are worth zero in this recession. Except to maybe a free renter!

There ARE decent and correct ways to do things!

Submitted by PS1441 on Wed, 06/24/2009 - 6:08am.

Oh, Bonkers, once again you assume information you are not privy too. Got to love this forum, so many opinions, so little information.

Submitted by monkey on Wed, 06/24/2009 - 3:21pm.

The info that you may not be privy to is that the two homes purchased are in addition to the beautiful home that was renovated by the PGR -

So they wouldve had two investments homes and two handicap accessible homes if the charity went through with it.

As a donor of the charity and other military charities, THANK GOODNESS they did not waste my hard earned contributions from me on someone who obviously has the means to have a home that is handicap accessible.

BTW - I have no investment properties because I cannot afford it but I contribute to this cause.

And the 3rd home that was renovated was purchased by David for $140,000 in January 09. All this info can be found in the county record online.

SO there are the two "investment" homes that supposedly were purchased in October of 08 with the TSGLI money from the government $100,000 then they bought another beautiful home bordering a golf course and a lake which the PGR renovated and the Battles were welcomed home to in this article.
Enough is enough, I hope the Maryland home will go to a truly needy family....I wish the Battles happiness in their home in Georgia.

Submitted by head_ragg on Wed, 06/24/2009 - 3:38pm.

clayton? I didn't see a 3rd property. What is the address? The other 2 in Clayton that I found were well away from county line rd.

This 'cousin' should have never put this is the paper. Did they think the people wouldn't realize the parade route ended at a different house than the 2 listed as investment properties. It seems the whole thing was stiched together with lies by 'truebeliever' sort of ...if you don't believe this one, here is x, y, and z. Believe anyone you want as the truth.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.