Cops tag serial vandal in PTC

Tue, 05/19/2009 - 3:05pm
By: John Munford

Cops tag serial vandal in PTC

Peachtree City police have filed more criminal charges against a Senoia man for graffiti painted in several areas of town.

Peter John Luker, 23, of Stonebridge Way, Senoia, is accused of “tagging” graffiti on rear business doors at the Braelinn shopping center and brick walls at First Baptist Church and Kane Yama Japanese Steakhouse & Sushi Bar, according to warrants for his arrest.

Luker is also accused of painting graffiti on concrete pillars of the cart path bridge on Ga. Highway 54 near City Hall and also on a cart path sign, a wooden city map and a sewer drain cover on the cart path near Crosstown Drive, court documents said.

Among Luker’s graffiti “art” were drawings of robots and the words “bots,” “tag” and “tag back.”

Police have returned the favor, tagging Luker with five new charges: one count of criminal damage to property in the second degree (felony), two counts of criminal trespassing (misdemeanor) and two counts of interference with government property (misdemeanor).

Luker is also charged with creating graffiti in the Flat Creek Nature Area, which is where police caught up with him Wednesday, May 6. An alert citizen dialed 911 after spotting someone holding a spray paint can, police said.

When officers found Luker in the nature area after 8 p.m., his hands had spray paint on them and the graffiti “tags” in the park were still wet, police said.

Luker was also found in possession of stencils that were apparently used to tie him to the other graffiti reported in town.

Citizens are encouraged to be on the lookout for suspicious persons who might be responsible for graffiti. Residents are also asked to report graffiti to city officials so it may be photographed, documented and cleaned.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by YourGoodPalMike on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 1:52pm.

The reason for the felony charge is similar to purchasing a product in most other countries. You bargain back and forth until an agreement is made.

This kid won't be tagged (pun intended) with a felony. It will be reduced most likely. The felony charge is designed to get him freaked out so that he will confess to a lesser crime. It's like selling your home. Don't list it for the price you want. Go higher and let the buyer talk you down. That way you both get a bit of what you want.

His attorney will work on it right away (to get the felony reduced on a plea bargain). I'd be very surprised if the felony charge stuck.

He's not going to get in that much trouble, but it will be enough to seriously affect him for a couple years (fines, short jail time, community service, a good haircut, etc.).

I also tend to assume that he probably lives on someone else's dime, meaning he is probably unemployed or semi-employed and lives with mommy and daddy. Hopefully his parents will kick him out and make a man out of him. He probably should have been shown the door years ago. They call it tough love for a reason. It's tough on the kid and tougher on the parent, but it works. It's that old "this is going to hurt me more than it will you."

He's the perfect scenario of years gone by when the judge would say, "son, enlist in the military or go to jail." Then he'd go to the military, learn to be a man, and come out with respect, confidence, and real skills to succeed.

I just hope he was the one who was tagging the golfcart bridge over 74, because I am the one who covers it with paint each time it's tagged.

The brick wall he tagged at First Baptist Church (the church my family attends) had a horific message in large letters. It said, "God d--- us all!"

We were horrified when we saw it while driving by with our KIDS.

Is "God D--- us all" art? Not even close. It's vandalism.

I found the trick to beating these taggers is to go to Home Depot and buy specially mixed masonry paint. Then, grafitti or not, go and paint whatever part of town you want to look nice (I used an earthtone brown). Now, each time some young guy tags the bridge, I cover it up and the paint matches perfectly (instead of those ugly rectangles that are obvious).

If each person in the community just picked one wall somewhere to call their own, paint it (and have lots of extra masonry paint), then the taggers would eventually give up.

Our bridge (74) between Centennial and Cedarcroft only gets tagged during long breaks in school. Not too hard to figure out that it's a high school kid.

I'd love to catch someone doing it so I could follow them home and call the cops.

Back to the story: This "kid" who is 23 is about to learn a man-sized lesson. He's been an adult for five years. He should have graduated college by now. He should be finishing up his first year of a real career or in grad school, etc. Or he should be well-advanced in a good skill (like carpentry, welding, plumbing, etc.).

He should be a homeowner by now (or saving to be one in the next few years).

Instead he's a bum, and the sad part is that someone affords him the lifestyle to be a bum.

Submitted by skyspy on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 7:33pm.

Be careful what you chose to destroy.

Gene61's picture
Submitted by Gene61 on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 1:14pm.

I don't feel like this man, yes , he is a adult, is being over charged.The charges fit the crime and hopefully will serve its purpose to be deterrent to others.

As for the postings adding sexuality into the picture, its more evidence that some people just don't get it..Straw man issues serve no real purpose.


John Munford's picture
Submitted by John Munford on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 1:13pm.

The felony charge is predicated on the monetary amount of damage. In this case it's the estimated repair cost of $1,500 to $2,000. I think if the damage was $500 or less it would be a misdemeanor.

The arrest warrant for the felony charge said the damage was caused to "several" rear business doors at Braelinn Village.


Submitted by onewhocares on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 12:01pm.

I don't think he should be charged a felony. I do believe he should be the one to clean it up. Obviously he has never been made to clean up after himself. This will be a perfect opportunity for him to learn how to do so. I bet by the time he has finished cleaning he will never do it again. They can post what address he will be at on what day and the citizens can drive by and honk if they choose to do so. I know when I was growing up if I slammed the screen door, my dad made me stand there and open and close it 20 times without making a squeek. I learned quickly not to let the screen door slam on my way outside.

Submitted by Spyglass on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 2:11pm.

In my humble opinion.

Submitted by Arf on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 5:16am.

First member of the new community service grass cutting team?

Submitted by Spyglass on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 2:12pm.

The goof offs would like nothing better than to be sentenced to cut grass, etc..aka TEAR UP THE EQUIPMENT.

Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 5:26am.

Why should we pay big bucks to a landscape contractor when we can simply sign up for community service "volunteers" who will work half as hard cutting grass as the professionals. No matter, just get twice as many. Only cost would be the supervisors and we could hire back 10 of those we fired and everyone wins. Just think of it - 10 crews cutting grass every day.

There is no shortage of community service people and if we talked to a couple of judges we could have an endless supply for years to come. Best of all, we could make all the speeders in traffic court put in about 30 hours for each speeding offense in addition to their fine. DUI would require 6 months on the grass gang. Think revenue production!


matt.barnes's picture
Submitted by matt.barnes on Thu, 05/21/2009 - 10:00am.

Acually our communtiy service kids used to help with the city maintance before we outsourced the department. Now if you get community service they send you to the thrift store to stand around in the air conditioning.


Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 3:27am.

this young would be caned and sentenced to prison time. Does anyone remember the Michael Fay incident back in 1994?
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


TinCan's picture
Submitted by TinCan on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 1:28pm.

Didn't they eventually let him go without the a-- whipping?


Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Thu, 05/21/2009 - 5:01am.

Nope. President Clinton requested leniency saying the sentence was too harsh so out of respect to the president, Singapore authorities reduced the punishment from 6 to 4 strokes.
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


Submitted by FightThePower on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 12:29am.

For those of you that don't know, felony charges prevent any troubled child to further their lives in a positive way forever. The decisions that this peson made were wrong, and entirely intolerable, but there are better ways to punish him besides giving him felony charges. Felons cannot obtain a passport, vote, get any good job, join any military service. Basically this person will be condemned to a life of misery because of the poor choices he made as a young man? I'm sorry but that just doesn't sit well with me. Felons shoot and kill people, commit fraud, sell drugs and guns, rob people, etc.......... not by tagging. I say he should have to do an insane amount of community service, clean and fix any property he caused damage to on his own nickel, a couple years of probation and a few thousand dollars will curb anyones desire to spraypaimt anything.

Submitted by askari on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 8:17am.

"... felony charges prevent any troubled child ..."

You gotta be kidding. This guy is 23 years old and not a child. He is fully responsible for his actions. By that age I was married, lived in my own home and had done two combat tours.

Submitted by Biggis101 on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 9:36am.

At 23 I had graduated college, bought a home, had started my career, and had a two year old. This is NO child here. It's easy for someone to try and downplay this incident when it's not their property. If this guy had "tagged" their home (and caused thousands of dollars of damage) they would screaming for this guy to hang.

Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Thu, 05/21/2009 - 5:22am.

When I was 23 I completed my military obligation - as an officer, was close to being a college grad and starting law school and had a responsible full-time job. What's so different today? There are plenty of jobs (if you want to actually work), there is certainly an Army option and college as well. In fact you join the Army and serve and they will send you to college.

All those choices and this loser is defacing someone else's property with graffiti? At age 23? That's embarrassing.


Submitted by Jrnlst on Tue, 05/19/2009 - 11:59pm.

He would learn a better lesson from simply cleaning his graffiti and being issued community service. Realistically, we are talking about artwork. Whether or not you like the appearance of this art form, it is still artwork. Sure, it may have made things ugly and most people do not like it, but would you consider it a felony? I don't see how anything he did actually hurt anyone. Did he physically damage any property or just paint it? He should be ordered to return everything he "tagged" back to it's original form, out of his pocket and from his own hard work. This will teach him life lessons instead of instilling fear and hatred in him towards the justice system and the community.

We will quickly lock up a kid who wants to paint and express himself artistically, but sit and watch the scenic destruction caused by the rapid growth of this once pleasant community. The city is currently operating in a deficit, isn't spending money on convicting this kid a waste of resources? They are going to charge the kid ($) then pay someone else to clean it ($). Why not just make him clean (free) it and give him time to think about his foolishness. (free) Then he can do community service for one of the thrift stores. (free+good)

Like the person below said: hang a sign on his neck and make him work for forgiveness. Thats how you learn lessons: give him a felony and he will hate the community forever.

Submitted by Spyglass on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 2:14pm.

Let him work his "art" skills at somewhere he actually has permission. I cannot believe you would condone these actions.

Submitted by Dondol on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 10:02am.

What kind of Puff the Magic Dragon World do you live in? The property that this little darling expressed himself artistically on is owned by people work hard for what they have and have a right to protect their property. This perp that you talk about is also not a kid, he is 23 years old and should know better, but apparently not. The very best thing that could happen to this young Man is to instill a little fear and respect, if his parents had done their job we wouldn't be having this problem. You sound like that nutty art teacher at booth. Put the bong down and come back to reality, it's not a bad place.

Obama's weapon of Choice!

Submitted by BMF on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 7:11am.

I wonder what your opinion of this "artist" would be if he created artwork on your property or on a business you owned. I don't think you'd paint him (forgive the pun) in such a favorable light. I'm not buying the artist/artwork angle at all.

I do agree with what most of the others have said about the felony being a bit harsh. Some community service and restitution to pay for the damages he's caused would be a better suited punishment in my opinion. Kids and young adults sometimes do stupid things. A felony can have a serious impact on someone's future. If the harsh penalty is to prevent future occurrences of spraypainting from happening, the reality is that the kids who do these types of things likely don't keep up with the news. Hence, the stiff penalty wouldn't be a deterrent.

Submitted by Pierrot le fou on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 4:32am.

While I agree that he should not be charged with felonies, I think it is a stretch to call stenciled tags artwork. If you want to make the case for graffiti, talk about something like the Krog Street Bridge in Atlanta, not some kid using stencils and writing "bots" on private property.

Submitted by mysteryman on Tue, 05/19/2009 - 5:46pm.

What a poster child for feed the hungry... Too bad he did not have his Timbalands tied up, or he would have gotten away.... Anyone who had laid eyes on this cat in their neighborhood shoud have called 911 anyway whether he was doing anything or not.... Definately a LUKER....PEACE...

Submitted by MacTheKnife on Tue, 05/19/2009 - 5:41pm.

I like the whole 'caining' thing the Chinese did when they caught the other little scumbucket of ours 'tagging'. But since we are so humane here, I say this guy should have a mandatory sentence of cleaning and picking up trash and cleaning up spray paint all summer and next winter with a big sign on that says "I got caught spray painting buildings in Fayette County". A little humiliation and humble pie and some good hard work I tell you .... that's the ticket for this afro clown!

By the way, does he look like a Republican or Democrat to you? Eye-wink

And also, what kind of tagger uses freaking stencils? A wanna be tagger? Is that a 'wagger'? Maybe he's a fake tagger.... that would be a 'fa'.....oh.... never mind. Ha! What a moron!

mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 4:53am.

That little beard is another indicator of gayness. And I agree, the felony is overkill and non-productive. 12 months of cleaning up after others would be the best punishment. After all, this is kids crime and the goal is to change behavior before he gets out of his teens. We want him to be a big responsible adult with a job by the time he is in his 20's.

I really like the idea of a sign around his neck.


Evil Elvis's picture
Submitted by Evil Elvis on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 8:21am.

Your beloved faggots surely use advanced découpage methods rather than garish fishwife stencils. I mean really.

Muddy: Four gay dudes enter a bar and find but one bar stool to sit on. How do they solve this dilemma?


Submitted by Dondol on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 10:34am.

"Muddy: Four gay dudes enter a bar and find but one bar stool to sit on. How do they solve this dilemma?"

I would say that if it were a four legged bar stool then they all could be accommodated.

Obama's weapon of Choice!

mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Sun, 05/24/2009 - 5:44am.

at all


Submitted by Hey on Wed, 05/20/2009 - 8:17am.

Too late, he's already in his 20's. Maybe by the time he's in his 30's he'll be a responsible adult with a job.

Submitted by dwsscs on Tue, 05/19/2009 - 4:18pm.

Maybe he should be made to actually clean up the graffiti he created. With his own money and sweat...

If your neighbors fences were "tagged" by this guy. Tell them to call the police so it can be added to his list of crimes.

Submitted by Spyglass on Tue, 05/19/2009 - 3:23pm.

Loser...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.