Airport won't oppose subdivision proposal

Wed, 05/13/2009 - 6:50pm
By: John Munford

The Peachtree City Airport Authority has decided not to oppose a 80-home subdivision and event center that would be built near the end of the runway at Falcon Field.

The authority is asking developer Pathway Communities to meet four requests upon which its approval is conditioned for the Callula Hill subdivision.

The subdivision, if a rezoning is approved by the City Council, would be located on the other side of the northern end of the runway just on the other side of two golf holes at Planterra Ridge Golf Course. The parcel is not adjacent to any residentially-zoned property but is situated next to industrially-zoned property and also the golf course.

Authority Chairman Mike Brady noted that the Federal Aviation Administration has agreed that the authority is adequately protecting its runway safety zone.

“We are satisfied that we are in compliance,” Brady said.

Pathway has agreed to include information for all homeowners notifying them of the airport’s proximity, Brady said. Doing that will “at best mitigate any future problems from residents in that area,” he added.

Former airport manager Jim Savage asked if the authority would take a stance for or against the development, but Brady replied such a decision is outside of the authority’s jurisdiction.

“It’s not really within our jurisdiction to do that,” Brady said.

Ultimately the rezoning from industrial use to residential and commercial use is up to the City Council.

Airport Manager John Crosby said a small portion of the property, about a third of an acre, is in the airport’s runway safety zone and that Pathway has previously agreed to not build any structures in the airports 20-1 approach slope.

The airport has an 1,000 foot obstacle-free safety area off its runway thanks to a deal several years ago wherein the airport purchased land from Pathway Communities off the runway’s north end to allow two golf holes to be moved at Planterra Ridge. That allowed for the road path for TDK Boulevard, a road that was to extend into rural Coweta County, to be moved further away from the airport, Crosby said.

It wasn’t until months after that deal was consummated that the City Council scuttled funding for the TDK Boulevard project, which drew criticism after Coweta County officials announced a 3,000 home subdivision that would use TDK to access Ga. Highway 74.

The authority's vote to approve a letter that would not oppose the proposed development was unanimous with authority member Jerry Cobb absent.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Steve Brown's picture
Submitted by Steve Brown on Sun, 05/17/2009 - 4:06pm.

The developers and Logsdon finally got their way with the Airport Authority. (See my uncertain post from earlier this month, below)

Steve Brown: Airport Authority decision
Submitted by Steve Brown on Tue, 05/12/2009 - 12:24am.

There is some arm-twisting going on at Falcon Field. It is very obvious this development plan is very wrong for that site.

I am concerned because attorney Doug Warner is probably involved.

Hopefully, the Airport Authority will have the guts to protect their interests, and, in the long run, our interests (because our tax dollars will have to bail them out of future trouble regarding such developments).


Gene61's picture
Submitted by Gene61 on Thu, 05/14/2009 - 2:20pm.

Researchers have known for years that exposure to excessively-loud noise can cause changes in blood pressure as well as changes in sleep and digestive patterns -- all signs of stress on the human body. The very word “noise” itself derives from the Latin word “noxia,” which means injury or hurt.

On a 1997 questionnaire distributed to two groups--one living near a major airport, and the other in a quiet neighborhood--two-thirds of those living near the airport indicated they were bothered by aircraft noise, and most said that it interfered with their daily activities. The same two-thirds complained more than the other group of sleep difficulties, and also perceived themselves as being in poorer health.

Perhaps even more alarming, the European Commission, which governs the European Union (E.U.), considers living near an airport to be a risk factor for coronary heart disease and stroke, as increased blood pressure from noise pollution can trigger these more serious maladies. The E.U. estimates that 20 percent of Europe’s population -- or about 80 million people -- are exposed to airport noise levels it considers unhealthy and unacceptable.

Airport Noise Affects Children

Airport noise can also have negative effects on children’s health and development. A 1980 study examining the impact of airport noise on children’s health found higher blood pressure in kids living near Los Angeles’ LAX airport than in those living farther away. A 1995 German study found a link between chronic noise exposure at Munich’s International Airport and elevated nervous system activity and cardiovascular levels in children living nearby. And a 2005 study published in the prestigious British medical journal, The Lancet, found that kids living near airports in Britain, Holland and Spain lagged behind their classmates in reading by two months for every five decibel increase above average noise levels in their surroundings. The study also associated aircraft noise with lowered reading comprehension, even after socio-economic differences were considered.

Citizen Groups Concerned About Effects of Airport Noise and Pollution
Living near an airport also means facing significant exposure to air pollution. Jack Saporito of the U.S. Citizens Aviation Watch Association (CAW), a coalition of concerned municipalities and advocacy groups, cites several studies linking pollutants common around airports--such as diesel exhaust, carbon monoxide and leaked chemicals--to cancer, asthma, liver damage, lung disease, lymphoma, myeloid leukemia, and even depression. CAW is lobbying for the clean up of jet engine exhaust as well as the scrapping or modification of airport expansion plans across the country.
.


matt.barnes's picture
Submitted by matt.barnes on Wed, 05/13/2009 - 8:41pm.

What are the chances of postponing this vote until we have our new city council?


Submitted by skyspy on Wed, 05/13/2009 - 8:49pm.

How would the current knuckleheads be able to get their thank you greenbacks? It has to pass before they are thrown out.

borntorun's picture
Submitted by borntorun on Wed, 05/13/2009 - 8:24pm.

I'm no expert on this issue but seems to me that as stated by Mike Brady the FAA agreed the authority is adequately protecting its runway zone and it is not within the juridiction of the authority to take a stance either for it or against it, so what else could they say. No legal grounds to take a stance against it as far I can tell. And as for future lawsuits, I doubt it. I remember hearing some of the same comments when Planterra was built. Buyer beware as far as I'm concerned.


Submitted by Dondol on Thu, 05/14/2009 - 11:05am.

"the FAA agreed the authority is adequately protecting its runway zone"
That makes us feel real good and Safe coming from the FAA (First After the Autopsy). Don't know how much you know about the FAA, but they generally don't make any changes or do anything until someone DIES!

Obama's weapon of Choice!

Submitted by Dondol on Thu, 05/14/2009 - 11:05am.

Obama's weapon of Choice!

Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Wed, 05/13/2009 - 8:47pm.

have seen this many times before all over the country. Even though the airport was "there first", homeowners have sued the city, county or airport authorities because the the noise prevents them from enjoying their property. This is followed up by alleged concerns about safety. In many cases, if the zoning authorities had been firm with developers at the get-go and prevented housing encroachment in the airport area then the problems will be much less.
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


borntorun's picture
Submitted by borntorun on Wed, 05/13/2009 - 10:14pm.

Okay...they sued...please quote me cases where they won...again....I can file a suit against anybody and for just anything but big deal...so where was a lawsuit filed under your premise and the plaintiffs prevailed?

Again, this is such a non news story except for grumpy bloggers...oh yeah I forgot....also for Haddix and his campaign for mayor. HE AND DOUG GONNA FIGHT THIS KIND OF DEVELOPMENT!! Please....


Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Thu, 05/14/2009 - 3:23pm.

it starts like this and can escalate as high as this.

-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


borntorun's picture
Submitted by borntorun on Sat, 05/16/2009 - 10:01am.

The lawsuit you reference in the "this" link was for the airport failing to follow through with agreed upon remedies...not for the increase in noise. A little difference.

Regardless, the point I'm making is it doesn't make a hill of beans about the airport authority's stance on this issue as it has no legal authority.

Might as well as asked the Wilshire HOA for an opinion.


Submitted by boo boo on Thu, 05/14/2009 - 2:05am.

Ouch! Lawsuit in favor of homeowners on airport noise.
If it says it is broken the web site is-
www.zimmreed.com/airport_Noise.htm

Lawsuit

Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Wed, 05/13/2009 - 8:14pm.

Pathway has agreed to include information for all homeowners notifying them of the airport’s proximity, Brady said. Doing that will “at best mitigate any future problems from residents in that area,” he added.

Well, it hasn't work for other municipal airports. Pathway will inform the first buyer and that's all. I predict that within ten years the PTC council will be faced with upset residents complaining about the noise and then safety issues. Lawsuits will follow.

-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Wed, 05/13/2009 - 8:40pm.

The first lawsuit will come within 2 years - hopefully for just noise; hopefully not for a plane crashing into a house that should not be there. Brady can't be bought, he's been lobbied by the PCDC clowns - IMHO.


Submitted by skyspy on Wed, 05/13/2009 - 9:03pm.

Isn't there an assumption of risk if people actually choose to live on top of a runway?

I'm sure you are right. Every ambulance chaser liar....oooppps lawyer would jump at the chance to make money off of this.

borntorun's picture
Submitted by borntorun on Wed, 05/13/2009 - 8:50pm.

Again, its a moot point with regard to the airport authority. Their taking a position for or against it means as much as if you or I did. No legal authority. So I doubt PCDC would waste their time on Brady. Pointless.

As far as lawsuits, well hell anyone can file a lawsuit...and there are plenty of ambulance chasing lawyers who would take the case...however, it doesn't mean they would win...and if anyone did file one based on your premise, it'd get kicked out of court so fast the plaintiff's head would spin.

This decision by the airport authority is such a non news event. Just fodder for grumpy bloggers.


mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Wed, 05/13/2009 - 8:00pm.

Tip of the iceberg here. Setting the plate for council to do a 3-2 vote again. We need to be very scared of what is going to happen.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.