BoE: Should Fayette become a charter system?

Tue, 04/28/2009 - 3:48pm
By: Ben Nelms

Board of Education members will begin discussions at the work session May 4 about changing Fayette County’s governance of its school system.

They’ll consider the pros and cons of three options: becoming a charter system, changing to Investing in Education Excellence, also known as IE2 (IE-squared), or staying with the current method.

The first two concepts are touted as providing local school systems greater flexibility and more accountability.

The biggest different is that, unlike IE2 systems, charter systems require a move to local school governance, while IE2 contracts do not.

A change to a charter system would push much of the decision-making down to the individual school level through a governance council. Charter schools have more independence and a governing board within each school, said Superintendent John DeCotis.

DeCotis said nothing will be decided at the May 4 meeting. The agenda item is intended to offer an initial discussion to help determine if the board would like to consider implementing either IE2 or a charter system or maintain the school system’s current status for the next few years.

The state, however, is currently calling for all school systems to move to IE2 by 2013 unless approved for charter system status.

According to Georgia Dept. of Education (DOE), IE2 Partnership contracts are intended to provide local school districts with greater governance flexibility as a means to increasing student achievement.

As created by House Bill 1209 (2008), local boards of education (LBOE) can enter into multi-year contracts with the state Board of Education (SBOE) based on strategic plans developed in partnership with DOE and Governor’s Office of Student Achievement (GOSA). Such plans must identify specific school-level student achievement goals that are in addition to current federal accountability requirements.

Progress on meeting stated goals will be monitored annually by GOSA. A school board will lose local governance if the contract at any school has not met the performance goals for at least three consecutive years, according to DOE.

The other option to be considered by the Fayette board is a charter system. DOE Communications Director Dana Tofig described a charter system as a local school system that is operating under the terms of a charter.

The Charter Systems Act allows local boards of education to contract with the state Board of Education to become a charter system.

A charter system provides the opportunity for teachers, administrators, parents, and school boards to have greater flexibility to determine the educational needs of students within their district and requires some level of school level governance in the system.

To become a charter system, the local school system must submit a charter school petition to the DOE, after such petition has been approved by the local board.

A charter is a performance contract between a local school board and a charter petitioner. The charter petitioner can be a local school, local board of education, private individual, private organization, or state or local public entity that submits a petition for a charter, according to DOE.

The term “charter petitioner” does not include home study programs or schools, sectarian schools, religious schools, private for-profit schools, private educational institutions not established, operated, or governed by the state of Georgia, or existing private schools.

Fayette’s consideration mirrors similar discussions in Georgia’s more than 180 school districts.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by mysteryman on Sun, 05/10/2009 - 1:49pm.

The weather started getting rough....

The tiny ship was tossed....

If not for the courage of the crew...

They Minnow would be lost....

Good to know Colitis is at the helm....

BLESS...

Gene61's picture
Submitted by Gene61 on Wed, 04/29/2009 - 10:55am.

Pros

According to proponents:

Charter schools present students and parents with an increasingly diverse array of education options.

The competition provided by charter schools forces school districts to improve the performance of their schools in order to attract and retain students and dollars.

If managed properly, charter schools serve as laboratories for education experimentation and innovation. The easing of certain regulations can free teachers and administrators to develop and implement new learning strategies.

Increased accountability for charter schools means that schools have to perform or risk closure. This extra incentive demands results.

Cons

According to opponents:

Because charter schools operate as a business, as well as a learning institution, they are subject to market forces that may eventually force them to close, depriving students of a continuous education.

Charter schools sometimes segregate students along racial and class lines and fail to adequately serve students with disabilities or limited English proficiency.

Accountability for student performance is difficult to measure and enforce in the burgeoning charter school movement. The usual complications of accurate student measurement are compounded by the often-conflicting demands of the state government’s need for accountability and the marketplace’s desire for opportunity.

The emergence of education management organizations as proprietors of charter schools creates “pseudo-school districts” in which decisions are made far removed from the school.


sniffles5's picture
Submitted by sniffles5 on Wed, 04/29/2009 - 10:18am.

The FCBOE talking about "greater flexibility" is the greatest use of "code words" since the Dixiecrats used the phrase "states rights" in the 1940s.

Turning Fayette county into a "charter school system" would benefit exactly three people in Fayette county: Janet Smola, Terri Smith, and Lee Wright.

Going "Charter" would remove what little accountability these three commissioners face. It would essentially give legal foregiveness to some of their more questionable practices (i.e. saving Smola's son's job). They'd be given free reign to implement purchasing department kickbacks, unencumbered by policies prohibiting self-dealing and conflict of interest. Janet Smola could continue her practice of renting out school busses to organizations she has a business interest in.

The "more accountability" claim is a canard. INDIVIDUAL SCHOOLS might face more accountability, but we the public don't vote on principals and other school leaders. The "more accountability" for individual schools would be offset by LESS accountability for the school board.

The Gang of Three has essentially life tenure. A lack of district voting allows these three to cater to a small but politically potent base of voters in the Brooks/Woolsey area. When you add in the votes of the school system employees themselves, it virtually guarantees a near-insurmountable edge in votes for the incumbents.

A greater lack of accountability on the part of the school board (one can almost picture Terri Smith whining she did nothing LEGALLY wrong the next time she's caught with her hand in the cookie jar) will only reward the Gang of Three and their continuing record of mismanagement.


Submitted by ptcmom678 on Wed, 04/29/2009 - 9:38am.

The charter school concept might be worth re-visiting once a new BOE is in place, however, seeing what the BOE has done with their current level of powers, I am not sure they're responsible enough to handle additional responsibilities in a professional manner. Heaven knows where new school buildings would wind up, not to mention the total decimation of any technical schools. The current board refuses to admit that not every Fayette County kid wants, needs to, or should go to college immediately upon graduation, which is why our drop-out rate keeps going up.

Submitted by Dondol on Wed, 04/29/2009 - 9:30am.

While we're on the subject of FCBOE I have to ask this question. When did the FCBOE remove all of the hot water faucets and piping from the student bathrooms? In all of the student bathrooms in both JC Booth & McIntosh these were removed and to top if off they have nether paper towels or hot air hand drier's. While the bathrooms that the Teachers use have both hot water and towels. In restaurants they have signs prompting employees to wash hands after going to the bathroom for sanitary reasons, our board of education does not believe that our children should do the same by supplying them with proper means to accomplish this. With the Swine Flu scare we are told to wash our hands frequently, but I have to wonder just what cold water and wiping your wet hands on your pants does to help prevent spend of the Disease. I will bet you anything that they have hot water and paper towels at the BOE home office, but why should they be made to provide these for "those people's kids".

Obama's weapon of Choice!

suggarfoot's picture
Submitted by suggarfoot on Wed, 04/29/2009 - 6:06pm.

scare? Are these people crazy? Let me get this straight, they don't put them in there because the kids ...MIGHT.. STOP UP THE TOLIETS WITH THEM? I'm sure they have cameras in there.

It seems the money flows at the top for salaries...how bout a little money for sanitary paper towels...SO THE KIDS DON'T SPREAD GERMS/SWINE FLU/ AND DIE!!!

WHAT A BUNCH OF DUMB A@@@SSSESS!!


eodnnaenaj1's picture
Submitted by eodnnaenaj1 on Wed, 04/29/2009 - 10:15am.

I can't speak for the hot water situation. However, on the paper towels, it is very sad but true, if towels are provided every toilet in the building and every sink is completely stopped up with paper towels. I don't know about air dryers, shoot that may fall in the category of salt, and not be worthy expense!


Nagatsubo's picture
Submitted by Nagatsubo on Tue, 04/28/2009 - 4:56pm.

It's about time we get charter schools here.


sniffles5's picture
Submitted by sniffles5 on Tue, 04/28/2009 - 4:02pm.

Giving the FCBOE charter school status is the moral equivalent of giving the Taliban a high yield nuclear device.


Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Tue, 04/28/2009 - 4:39pm.

Have you got your campaign signs ready.
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.