-->
Search the ArchivesNavigationContact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
BoE: Should Fayette become a charter system?Tue, 04/28/2009 - 3:48pm
By: Ben Nelms
Board of Education members will begin discussions at the work session May 4 about changing Fayette County’s governance of its school system. They’ll consider the pros and cons of three options: becoming a charter system, changing to Investing in Education Excellence, also known as IE2 (IE-squared), or staying with the current method. The first two concepts are touted as providing local school systems greater flexibility and more accountability. The biggest different is that, unlike IE2 systems, charter systems require a move to local school governance, while IE2 contracts do not. A change to a charter system would push much of the decision-making down to the individual school level through a governance council. Charter schools have more independence and a governing board within each school, said Superintendent John DeCotis. DeCotis said nothing will be decided at the May 4 meeting. The agenda item is intended to offer an initial discussion to help determine if the board would like to consider implementing either IE2 or a charter system or maintain the school system’s current status for the next few years. The state, however, is currently calling for all school systems to move to IE2 by 2013 unless approved for charter system status. According to Georgia Dept. of Education (DOE), IE2 Partnership contracts are intended to provide local school districts with greater governance flexibility as a means to increasing student achievement. As created by House Bill 1209 (2008), local boards of education (LBOE) can enter into multi-year contracts with the state Board of Education (SBOE) based on strategic plans developed in partnership with DOE and Governor’s Office of Student Achievement (GOSA). Such plans must identify specific school-level student achievement goals that are in addition to current federal accountability requirements. Progress on meeting stated goals will be monitored annually by GOSA. A school board will lose local governance if the contract at any school has not met the performance goals for at least three consecutive years, according to DOE. The other option to be considered by the Fayette board is a charter system. DOE Communications Director Dana Tofig described a charter system as a local school system that is operating under the terms of a charter. The Charter Systems Act allows local boards of education to contract with the state Board of Education to become a charter system. A charter system provides the opportunity for teachers, administrators, parents, and school boards to have greater flexibility to determine the educational needs of students within their district and requires some level of school level governance in the system. To become a charter system, the local school system must submit a charter school petition to the DOE, after such petition has been approved by the local board. A charter is a performance contract between a local school board and a charter petitioner. The charter petitioner can be a local school, local board of education, private individual, private organization, or state or local public entity that submits a petition for a charter, according to DOE. The term “charter petitioner” does not include home study programs or schools, sectarian schools, religious schools, private for-profit schools, private educational institutions not established, operated, or governed by the state of Georgia, or existing private schools. Fayette’s consideration mirrors similar discussions in Georgia’s more than 180 school districts. login to post comments |