PTC still wants control of trash pickup; franchise rule on agenda

Tue, 04/14/2009 - 4:05pm
By: John Munford

Residents would be forced to pay for recycling whether they use it or not

Peachtree City may soon require all garbage service companies to enter an agreement with the city in exchange for the privilege of serving city residents.

Residents will still have the right to select any garbage company they choose under the “non-exclusive franchise” proposed by city staff. But garbage companies will be required to include single stream recycling as part of the base charge.

That means some residents who don’t want recycling will pay for the service anyway. Residents would not be required to recycle, however.

The issue will be discussed at Thursday’s City Council meeting, which starts at 7 p.m. at City Hall.

The city currently offers free recycling for city residents who haul their recyclables to the city-operated recycling center on Rockaway Road. The recycling center accepts #1 and #2 plastics, aluminum cans, cardboard, newspapers and magazines, clear, brown or green glass, electronic waste and yard trimmings. The recycling center is open Wednesdays from 1:30-4:30 p.m. and Saturdays from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

In December the city discontinued plastic recycling there after the hauling company decided to halt the free service. But in March the city took Jennings Trash Can Removal Company up on an offer to haul away the plastics at no charge.

Under the current non-franchise proposal, trash companies would be required to charge a franchise fee of $1 per quarter for each customer, which would equal about $40,000 a year. That money would be paid to the city and passed on to Keep Peachtree City Beautiful to pay for its anti-litter programs.

The city proposal does not mandate any particular rates, but it does require companies to provide a direct company contact for emergency notices.

Trash companies also will be forced to carry certain liability insurance coverage along with an umbrella policy of $1 million.

Last year an effort to mandate a single trash hauler for the entire city fell flat after critics claimed it would endanger the power of the free market system. At the time, city officials said the goal was to reduce trash bills for all residents and also make it easier to address issues such as liquid spilled on streets by trash trucks.

While the current proposal allows customers to choose their provider, it does accomplish another goal of the previously-sought franchise deal: it forces all residents to pay for recycling service by incorporating that charge in the base bill.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Gene61's picture
Submitted by Gene61 on Wed, 04/15/2009 - 3:23am.

Recycling charges, another way counties double dip the tax payer. PTC should change its name to " Money Grab City " .

PTC is fast becoming a joke and the more we read about how the so called " City Council " continues to look to take more and more money of tax payers pockets When will it end > Will PTC simply require its citizens to sign over their paychecks and the county will decide what you need to survive?

See this act before, that country failed. Will we be next?


Submitted by Spyglass on Thu, 04/16/2009 - 1:33pm.

I'm all for it.

Submitted by ignorantcouncil on Tue, 04/14/2009 - 8:57pm.

and they know it... the City stands to gain nothing from mandatory recycling. Bernie and staff were right all along - we should have gone with a single-provider, with a controlled price and mandatory recycling. Now, we're going to end up paying twice as much. Recycling needs to be mandatory to be successful. It's the only way. There are garbage cans out on my street 4 days a week, garbage trucks 4 days a week too. A single provider would have meant 1 day a week, 2 at the most. Much better anyway you look at it.

Submitted by Spyglass on Thu, 04/16/2009 - 1:29pm.

3-4 providers rumble up and down my street weekly. I'm not sure why, but it's the way it is.

Submitted by Dondol on Tue, 04/14/2009 - 9:03pm.

Don't know what hood you live in but in mine we have trash pick-up on Tuesday's only, so we don't have that problem.

Obama's weapon of Choice!

Submitted by Spyglass on Thu, 04/16/2009 - 1:32pm.

And my immediate neighbors too, but the rest of the neighborhood uses 2-3 or more different providers, and I'm quite sure some of them are in here more than once a week. But hey, it's what the Citizens wanted, so I'm in.

Submitted by mysteryman on Tue, 04/14/2009 - 8:54pm.

Cause i forgot the grease.....Looks like it gonna be a DRY ----!!!! You fill in the blank.....PEACE

Don Haddix's picture
Submitted by Don Haddix on Tue, 04/14/2009 - 8:53pm.

Requiring liability is nothing new, here or elsewhere.

Since the discussions, last year, two or three providers have already rolled in recycling pick up at the same rate as just trash. One, at least, was doing that prior to the meetings last year.

There is no requiring anyone to recycle or even to get a recycling can.

I opposed the mandated single provider recycling. Still do.

This gives everyone the option to recycle curb side or not, which is a good thing, since many will not haul recycling to a center. It allows competition to set the price, not the City, which is also a good thing.

With at least two companies already providing the services at the same cost of trash alone, other companies will have to do the same thing to compete.

We have no idea how long the company placing the containers at the recycling centers will be able to do so. They made it very clear that a point would be reached they could inventory no more for free, at which point charges would return, or the market for recyclables would come back.

If there is a better way than this dual approach for this I do not know what it would be. It is also a long term set of solutions that is fairly self adapting to any market condition for recycling.

Don Haddix
PTC Councilman
Post 1
donhaddix.com


Submitted by Spyglass on Thu, 04/16/2009 - 1:31pm.

And I applaud the City for efforts to make recycling more popular.

Submitted by Dondol on Tue, 04/14/2009 - 8:20pm.

This is a Power and Money grab by the City plain and simple. Yes recycling is a good thing and everyone should do it, but by their own accord, not by being bullied into it by a {{{EDITED}}} mayor and his bunch cronies. Bernie is just trying to find a way for the citizens pay for the move of the recycling center that the state should have payed for with the money for the property that they took for the widening of 74. God I can't wait for Otis to be replaced.

Obama's weapon of Choice!

DarkMadam's picture
Submitted by DarkMadam on Thu, 04/16/2009 - 1:23pm.

Here is a question for you. What would you think of Haddix being the new mayor? Just my humble opinion, but I think it would be "out of the frying pan and into the fire"! (BTW I have noticed that suddenly he has reappeared on the blogs).


Submitted by Dondol on Thu, 04/16/2009 - 4:05pm.

I still think that Haddix would be a good choice for Mayor. With that being said Mickey Mouse would be better than what we have now!

Obama's weapon of Choice!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.