I smell mother of the year here! Another crack pot and another attempt to bring attention to a martical spat? Please, jail time is what will cure of her interest in fire.

Great example there mom on how to talk things out using fire.

I smell mother of the year here! Another crack pot and another attempt to bring attention to a martical spat? Please, jail time is what will cure of her interest in fire.

Great example there mom on how to talk things out using fire.

Adultry used to be...but people have conveniently forgotten that! Wonder why??? They both have tragic consequences. This is a very sad example. WAKE UP AMERICA!

....setting a fire in a dwelling not yours, had intent, and had damage to the dwelling. As there was a small amount of damage that was testified by the Fire Marshall, a few had doubts whether the fire caused the actual damage, did not believe the fire marshall. therefore arson could not be proven as the item the rags were on were not part of the house. As the jury had to be unanimous, the few dissensions were firm that they would not change their minds.

I believe that these few ruled with their hearts and not according to the letter of the law, and I think they felt that first degree arson was too heavy of a charge given the small amount of damage the flames caused. I think people felt Ms Corsey was a misguided but good person which influenced them more than the evidence. These type of people should never sit on a jury, as they lost their objectivity and were more influenced by her plight as a distraught wife. In that, the defense did a great job of planting that seed even though they took a beating for it. I believe the dissenters ruled on sympathy and used reasonable doubt of the small amount of damage as an excuse. Jurors disavow the sworn duty when that occurs.

One is supposed to be impartial when on a jury and make decisions on the facts and testimony. It was Ms Corsey's lucky day that a few jurors had a soft spot over the heavy charge vs the little damage as well as the sordid stories by the defense. And thank goodness it was a jury that recognized it couldn't go any further vs trying to influence anyone that would have simply gone with the majority.

Of course, it should be asked...why would a trained fireman have a home made diesel fuel making machine in his garage and think that was a good idea, especially with children involved? If that's not illegal, we should be all scared.

My husband cheated on me. After finding out (by him announcing that he was leaving me for her), revenge was the furthest thought from my mind. Yes, what he did to me was painful beyond belief. But in the long run it was the best 25th anniversary gift he could have given me. He gave me my life back. Now he's her burden.

I'm stunned.

To do something like this. Just when you thought you have heard it all.

So much for Darwins little theory....lets see.....rabid coyote......crazy ape in the jungle.....crazy woman who actually wants to keep a man who cheated on her, and thinks that burning down their home will make him want her more........Huh?? Thats a good one.

The lesson I take from this is that the human animal is just more destructive than the 4 legged animals....if that is considered "evolution" then maybe Darwin was smoking some good stuff back in the day.

Nice nothing says i love you more than a warm crackling fire,, can you say... Hey honey i smoked the kids... What a selfish ignorant clown, put everyone at risk, cause you and hubby cannot work it out, you know it takes two to tango... Maam rest assured if you do time or not, there will be no shortage of heat where you are going, when the bell tolls.....BLESS

when the husband betrayed his wife and burned up their marriage contract by breaking the marriage vows. Husbands...love your wives as Christ loves us...