The other side of a conversation about race

Terry Garlock's picture

As the hyperventilating over Barack Obama’s election subsides, along with disbelief this could happen in America, maybe a white conservative man like me can finally say a few things.

We wish the country would wake up to the fact that conservatives are not at all surprised a black man was elected; we have been pulling for black Americans to succeed for a very long time. After all, everyone’s prosperity and achievement make America a better place for all of us to chase our dreams.

We applaud millions of successful black Americans and hope they join conservatives in growing numbers with their votes to uphold the values of capitalism, property rights, freedom, limited government and self-reliance that built this country.

We also wish the media, when they turn to racial issues, would focus on blacks who provide for their family, pay taxes and hold American ideals dear, instead of always highlighting the grievance class of the uneducated, unemployed and unproductive.

But there are far too many of the latter, and if you are one of them, we have high hopes for you to take steps to turn your life around.

We encourage you to insist on being treated as the individual you are instead of lumped in a group that is presumed to think and act in unison. You should be outraged when pundits and politicians take your vote for granted by your race.

We look forward to your loud rejection of the likes of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, who profit by appointing themselves your leaders and presuming to speak for you.

We will jump for joy when black activists exchange victimhood for the determination to make the most of America’s opportunities, focusing on responsibilities at least as much as on rights.

We feel like cheering when Bill Cosby speaks the unwelcome truth that black girls should protect against pregnancy, black men should take responsibility for their offspring, academic achievement should be celebrated, not denigrated, and the black community should rebuff street values of thugs, pimps, bitches and “hoes” that has infected America’s music culture.

Three out of four black babies born to unwed mothers is a modern American train wreck that creates cyclical traps of poverty, despair and crime. It cannot be stopped with government programs, but it can be stopped by personal responsibility.

While we pull for you and everyone else to realize the American dream, we hope to end the fiction that racism is a one-way street. You should recognize racism in your own house and do something about it.

When conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is booed because he is expected, as a black man, to hold liberal views, that is fundamentally racist.

You blew a golden opportunity to declare Obama’s Rev. Wright a despicable racist. When Rev. Lowry ended his benediction at Obama’s inauguration with “... and when white will embrace what is right,” you should have cried foul. We would love to see blacks stand up for what is right on our side for a change.

In 1984 when Jesse Jackson first ran for president and Geraldine Ferraro became the Democrat Vice President nominee, pundits asked each other whether a woman or a black man was electable. Wrong question.

The question should have been whether America was ready for a far-left president like Jackson, who morphed over the years from a civil rights activist into a racial shakedown artist. Heck, no!

But give us strong conservatives like Herman Cain, Michael Steele, Bobby Jindal, Linda Lingle or Michelle Malkin, and we’d vote for him or her in a heartbeat. Race and gender have not mattered to us for a long time.

But our conservative ideals do matter quite a lot, and it is regrettable that our first black president is so far left he easily earns the “socialist” label.

I believe President Obama’s programs of anti-capitalism, socialization of medical care, colossal social spending and waging war on the successful, while rewarding the non-producers, will do America grave and lasting harm.

I will oppose those programs, and I fervently hope he fails in his attempts to shift America far to the left.

Whether you are black or not, if you support President Obama’s programs because of who he is rather than because you are aligned with him on the issues, I hope you recognize it is you who are the racist, not me.

[Terry Garlock lives in Peachtree City.]

login to post comments | Terry Garlock's blog

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by Davids mom on Tue, 03/10/2009 - 10:11pm.

But our conservative ideals do matter quite a lot,

Garlock: Where have you been for the last 8 years? How did you allow your conservative leaders to go so far 'right' of the Constitution? I'm a democrat - and a fiscal conservative. There has been NOTHING conservative about the fiscal record for the past 8 years! Why are you suggesting minority leaders to get us out of this mess? What is your party's plan that would improve on what Obama's administration is implementing? Where were you when we spent the first funds for bailing out industry and banking - and there was NO PLAN to help the struggling middle class? The American people elected an American leader who has a plan for recovery. What is your party offering? At this point, who cares about the color of the President? Your argument – and your suggested ‘leaders’ are just another obstructive distraction to the failure of the Republican Party. Stop wasting our time with frivolous rhetoric – and bring meaning back to the two party system. If you have a better plan for economic recovery – let the Americans hear it! What you have offered for the past 8 years has devastated this country and the world. Race has NOTHING to do with this! Right?

Fred Garvin's picture
Submitted by Fred Garvin on Tue, 03/10/2009 - 10:50pm.

It's not that the conservative leaders have gone too far right, it's that the Republican leadership has moved too far to the left. They have forgotten what they stood for and why we elected them in the first place - that is why they have been losing elections.

The Bush tax cuts, which benefited the middle class as well as the upper class, were a conservative principle.

Conservatives (not necessarily Republicans) have been offering suggestions for a long time, but no one (including some Republicans) aren't paying attention.

Let's go over it again.

- Free Market Principles
- Less Government
- Low taxes (both personal and business) so that businesses can afford to hire more Americans.
- Personal Responsibility (end Welfare)
- The same opportunities for all (end discrimination in the workplace - i.e., end Affirmative Action, Government Set-Asides, etc, etc, etc.

True conservatives have been screaming these ideas from the rooftops for years, but liberals like yourself refuse to listen because it puts more responsibility on the individual and puts and end to the welfare state that Obama is so busy promoting.

The United States of America
July 4, 1776 - Jan 20, 2009
Rest in Peace


Submitted by Davids mom on Wed, 03/11/2009 - 2:04pm.

- Free Market Principles - and look what happened to American industry
- Less Government - will be great when we're back working again
- Low taxes (both personal and business) so that businesses can afford to hire more Americans. - this is being implemented as I type.
- Personal Responsibility (end Welfare) - oh please. When Palin's child had a child out of wedlock - it was a blessing - when black girls have one - it is a 'sin'. All of our children need direction based on principle and 'role models'. When we're back on our feet - then we, as adults, can teach personal responsibility in the home and in our worship places. We, as Americans, have not lived up to that responsibility. Welfare right now is saving this country from long soup lines and starving children. The 'greedy' have not lived up to social or fiscal conservative values - but as long as the controlling party benefited, this unregulated/unmonitored greed was allowed to continue. Yelling 'tax cuts' when too many people have no income to tax - is ludicrous. Once we get this country back to work - then we can look at the difference between liberal and conservative policies. Right now - the only policy that the American people are interested in is one that works! For 8 years - that has not been our experience.
- The same opportunities for all (end discrimination in the workplace - i.e., end Affirmative Action, Government Set-Asides, etc, etc, etc.- will be discussed when Americans are back at work!

S. Lindsey's picture
Submitted by S. Lindsey on Wed, 03/11/2009 - 9:44pm.

1. Free Market Principles - and look what happened to American industry The Free Market got us to where we are.. the Goverment put us where we are at..
2. Less Government - will be great when we're back working again When did the Goverment ever help Industry create jobs? Small Busineses Create jobs.. Goverment just gets in the way..
3. Low taxes (both personal and business) so that businesses can afford to hire more Americans. - this is being implemented as I type... Are you on meds??? Just asking... Where are these mythical Tax Cuts.. you mean that 95% remark.. Just like your faith that OBAMA was going to Veto all those earmarks.. don't hold your breath on the tax cuts.. They are going up not down see the Wall street Journals report on Obamanomics.. If he confiscated 100% of everyones salary that makes $75k or more it still will not pay for his programs.. so there goes those much "PROMISED" tax cuts..
4. Welfare right now is saving this country from long soup lines and starving children. REALLLY.. Tell that to the mommas out there with 4-8 kids all on welfare.. and yes I know them.
5. The 'greedy' have not lived up to social or fiscal conservative values.. Who is the "Greedy" you mean the "RICH" the ones who give more in Charity then you or I make..? and when is it their responcibility for someone elses poor choices?
5. Yelling 'tax cuts' when too many people have no income to tax - is ludicrous... If so many people have no income then why is the Goverment spending so much.. that statement is Ludicrous..
6. Right now - the only policy that the American people are interested in is one that works! For 8 years - that has not been our experience. What has changed? We are still in Iran.. We are moving more troops to Afganistan.. Spending has not slowed much less stopped.. Show me the change..
DM I know you mean well.. and you have your views as I have mine..and neither of us will change the other, however this Goverment is no longer "FOR THE PEOPLE" "BY THE PEOPLE".. WE all need to understand that we the people no longer exist to our Goverment.. we do not matter.. Feinstein said it best "Keep your hands off my earmarks.. it's Congress's money" Hey Feinstein it is not your money it OURS and WE WANT IT BACK..

I will not lower my standards.. So UP YOURS.. Evil

GUN CONTROL Link


Submitted by Davids mom on Wed, 03/11/2009 - 10:14pm.

Smiling Good night.

TinCan's picture
Submitted by TinCan on Wed, 03/11/2009 - 2:16pm.

For someone who espouses the refrain from racial references in posting you sure have a lot of racial references in your postings.


Submitted by Davids mom on Wed, 03/11/2009 - 5:11pm.

I joined this discussion years ago to discuss 'race'. I never claimed to be a party of 'refraining from racial references' while discussing race in America. I do continue to react to those who are hell-bent in identifying one segment of our populace always in the negative. Please point out the 'racial reference in the above post. You guys are going back and getting your 'talking points' to upset Davids Mom a little confused...cute tho. Smiling

Submitted by swac on Wed, 03/11/2009 - 4:58pm.

Lets face it folks, when you "messengers" blame President Obama for the financial and moral decay that president Bush caused you deserve to be attacked.

dawn69's picture
Submitted by dawn69 on Tue, 03/10/2009 - 11:05pm.

"They [republicans] have forgotten what they stood for and why we elected them in the first place..."

Mr. Garvin, I believe that is true for ALL politicians. There seems to me to be a severe disconnect between those we elect and 'everyman'. They might as well be saying to us: "Let them eat cake!".

Voltaire once said that a country man between two lawyers is like a mouse between two cats. I think the same metaphor can be used with politicians.

"That it will never come again is what makes life so sweet."
- Emily Dickinson


Spear Road Guy's picture
Submitted by Spear Road Guy on Tue, 03/10/2009 - 8:27pm.

I hope we can do better!!!

Vote Republican


Submitted by swac on Tue, 03/10/2009 - 8:56pm.

Wow! where to start.

As a proud democrat I will match our leadership to your inept conservative leadership anytime. Think Rush, Hannity, Coulter and lets not forget Abramoff, Delay, Gingrich and Bush. Oh! I forgot Cunningham, Libby, Rumsfeld and Cheney
Having just lived through the worst presidency in the history of the USA how can you write such garbage?

dawn69's picture
Submitted by dawn69 on Tue, 03/10/2009 - 10:54pm.

"Having just lived through the worst presidency in the history of the USA..."

Sorry, swac, but I think Andrew Jackson still takes the cake on that one.


S. Lindsey's picture
Submitted by S. Lindsey on Tue, 03/10/2009 - 9:02pm.

Just asking...

I will not lower my standards.. So UP YOURS.. Evil

GUN CONTROL Link


Submitted by skyspy on Tue, 03/10/2009 - 8:20pm.

Well said. Let's hope the leaders of our country see the the wisdom in turning away from socialism.

Has anyone else noticed that everytime obumbles talks about one of his new socialist programs the market tanks? Today I didn't hear any of his drivel and the market rose by 200 points.

The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money- Margaret Thatcher.

Submitted by Davids mom on Tue, 03/10/2009 - 10:19pm.

He spoke today - and the market did go up. You weren't listening. Smiling
Obama's speechs don't affect the market at this point. Only when his programs start putting people back to work; credit starts to flow to small business; etc., etc., etc. - will confidence be restored in the US economy. Let's hope that our monitoring of how the stimulus is being spent in our states will encourage our leaders to make changes if something isn't working!

sniffles5's picture
Submitted by sniffles5 on Tue, 03/10/2009 - 4:22pm.

EDITED for violations of terms of use.


mapleleaf's picture
Submitted by mapleleaf on Wed, 03/11/2009 - 3:40pm.

Where can we find and read the "terms of use"?


Cal Beverly's picture
Submitted by Cal Beverly on Wed, 03/11/2009 - 6:17pm.

On the front page of this site, scroll waaaaay down to the bottom. You'll find clickable links to the site privacy policy and terms of use.

Cal Beverly
publisher
The Citizen
Fayetteville, Ga. 30214

The link is below:

Terms of use


sniffles5's picture
Submitted by sniffles5 on Wed, 03/11/2009 - 3:45pm.

"Keep it clean. No obscene language. No threats of physical harm. No personal attacks on private persons. No "outing" or otherwise identifying or threatening to identify our registered users or their family members. Violate these simple, civilized rules, and we will remove your posts and ban you from any further posting. If you use sexual or smutty innuendoes, you will be banned from posting. Suggestions: Name-calling is usually just plain rude. Make your point with facts and logic. No plagiarism. No picking on Terry Garlock."


meanoldconservatives's picture
Submitted by meanoldconservatives on Wed, 03/11/2009 - 4:19pm.

"......... No picking on Terry Garlock."

Hey Sniffer, this seems like the perfect time to quote your separated-at-birth twin/fellow lib Main Stream.....

"Want some cheese with that whine????????" bwwwwaaahhhh


sniffles5's picture
Submitted by sniffles5 on Wed, 03/11/2009 - 11:46am.

I apologize for violating any "terms of use" in my post above. I hadn't realized that conducting a poll regarding one of your columnist's intentions and motivations was such a violation, I shall endeavor not to post any more such polls in the future.

I do hope that you took a look at the results of that poll before you sent it off to its untimely demise. I was immensely gratified (and conversely, I suspect you were intensely mortified) to note that despite the short life span on this site, the overwhelmingly majority of Citizen bloggers agreed with my position.

By a 5:1 voting ratio your users agreed with me that Terry Garlock is not interested in an altruistic dialogue about race relations, he's simply a patronizing demagogue who uses race as a "wedge issue" to promote the Republican brand.

Where I come from, we call that "race baiting".

I am very pleased that a good segment of your readers correctly see Terry Garlock for what he is.


S. Lindsey's picture
Submitted by S. Lindsey on Wed, 03/11/2009 - 4:25pm.

with your assertion that your poll was pro-your one sided beliefs and against Terry..
May need to go re-count those hanging Chads again.. ask Mr "Were all gonna burn" Gore. He still counts his dimples hoping to get a better result..

I will not lower my standards.. So UP YOURS.. Evil

GUN CONTROL Link


Submitted by Incognito on Wed, 03/11/2009 - 12:58pm.

I forgot to write it down to see the results of your poll. The one that questions what you do for fun on your free time. And what crap about Garlock. What was your sample size, and the motivations of those that took the poll. Where I am from, your posting is called an "Ad hominem" attack.
Not really an intelligent posting at all. I will assume that you suffer from the "Stephen Fowler" syndrome that recently made the news. Full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

sniffles5's picture
Submitted by sniffles5 on Wed, 03/11/2009 - 1:13pm.

I don't know what my sample size was, nor the "voters motivation" was, nor do I care. It was a simple "snap poll" to gauge reader reaction to Terry's patronizing drivel. And as your beloved decider used to brag: "Mission Accomplished!" I feel confident that I exposed him for the intellectual fraud that he is.

I applaud you for your half-assed effort to parody my poll, the pedophilia option was a bit over the top and I suspect that's what caused Cal to push the edit button. In any event, you show sparks of originality for a conservative, which put you above the usual cut-n-paste drivel of Fred Garvin and Li'l Snipey.

Now, both you and Snipey have accused me of "attacking the messenger". I suspect there is a grain of truth to that: over the years I've found that its really not worth my time or effort to debate the substance of the posts of the Looney Tunes fringe: fairtax supporters, creationists, and race-baiting bigots. So I usually just register my disgust, with a dollop or two of sarcasm, and move on.


Submitted by Incognito on Wed, 03/11/2009 - 2:26pm.

Called moral equivalence. I do not know who Garlock is, don't know who you are either. You chose to make overt statements of racism of both this individual, and the republican party in general. By smearing the individual you discredit the message. Do you really think that the entire message is wrong? You didn't care to debate it, just attack. I am tired of conservatives by definition being labeled as racist in whole cloth. If liberals view racism as the big sin that can tank any argument, then I will just label you with a different sin to tank yours. It is no more valid than what you did to Garlock.

hutch866's picture
Submitted by hutch866 on Wed, 03/11/2009 - 12:39pm.

Since I didn't see your poll, how many votes were cast in what time frame?

I yam what I yam....Popeye


Submitted by Incognito on Tue, 03/10/2009 - 7:35pm.

EDITED

I am sorry to not set up a good link. Just cut and paste for the fun. The choices aren't pretty sniffles. If you can tag Garlock with hatred and racism, then what keeps me from tagging you with other overt nastiness? Spousal abuse, child love, dog fighting, etc? I don't know you or what is in your heart. Go ahead and tar Terry Garlock with a racist brush, I will do likewise to you.

Submitted by AtHomeGym on Tue, 03/10/2009 - 6:36pm.

Snif, if you disagree with what Terry wrote, why not refute it with logic. No, instead you launch a oblique attack on the messenger, not the message. Poor form.

S. Lindsey's picture
Submitted by S. Lindsey on Tue, 03/10/2009 - 7:50pm.

Sniff tends to do that.. It is easier to attack the Messager then argue the point... We have to look at the message.. Terry's right it is past time to look this beast in the eye.

I will not lower my standards.. So UP YOURS.. Evil

GUN CONTROL Link


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.