Berube-McCammon

Mr. and Mrs. McCammon

login to post comments | view original
This image is copyrighted by The Citizen Newspapers and is intended for private use only. Please contact The Citizen for permission if you use to wish these images elsewhere.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by baroombrawl on Thu, 03/05/2009 - 3:58pm.

Is this image and some comments what the censoring of some on here was about?

Why on earth was such a wedding announcement put up for comments anyway? Did the paper do it or someone else manage it?

Also, I don't remember anyone saying anything bad about these two people.
What is going on here all this censoring?

Submitted by Jlo on Wed, 03/04/2009 - 7:05pm.

DELETED for violating the terms of use: Personal attacks on identified private persons.

Submitted by josephineb on Wed, 03/04/2009 - 8:43pm.

You must be the ex wife...

Submitted by Nitpickers on Wed, 03/04/2009 - 7:46pm.

DELETED for violating terms of use: personal attacks on identified private persons.

Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Wed, 03/04/2009 - 10:27pm.

very naughty!
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


Submitted by Bonkers on Fri, 03/06/2009 - 6:33am.

I looked for the personal attacks but didn't see any!
It seems to me that any time someone puts their picture in the paper no matter what they are doing in the picture, people can comment on it!
Was that the problem?
Must be another reason somewhere!

The Wedge's picture
Submitted by The Wedge on Fri, 03/06/2009 - 10:51am.

Bonkers, et al. I saw the comments before they were deleted. The first one stated their ill wishes point blank. Your posting merely discussed the cost of the wedding and the publicity around it having inversely proportional success. By definition, both of these postings were personal attacks on named private persons. They were on the face of it in bad taste. I agree that I am not understanding why anyone needs to comment on this at all.


Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Fri, 03/06/2009 - 6:45am.

Perhaps you need to discuss with Cal.
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


Submitted by baroombrawl on Fri, 03/06/2009 - 9:32am.

What does bonk need to discuss with Cal?
Do you know Cal? Might he say who is who?

There are four of us on my computer... I don't know how many bonk has, but it seems to me that is supposed to be his business not Cals or anyone else!

Why does this sort of thing fascinate some so much?
Next you will be wanting to know all of the Swiss bank account numbers and names!

Submitted by gregm35 on Thu, 03/05/2009 - 8:44pm.

Hi Cyclist

hutch866's picture
Submitted by hutch866 on Wed, 03/04/2009 - 9:35pm.

Was old $nit a bad boy?

I yam what I yam....Popeye


Submitted by Bonkers on Thu, 03/05/2009 - 4:11am.

Was he banned? Interfere with ad sales, what???
A lot of people here have been really pounding on the "extreme makeover" family, haven't they?

Is that a violation?
Is that what happened to snit?

Submitted by skyspy on Thu, 03/05/2009 - 8:13am.

You have about 20 other personalities that will fill in even though old nitpicker$ is banned.

hutch866's picture
Submitted by hutch866 on Thu, 03/05/2009 - 5:16am.

Well Bonk ol' buddy, since you and $nit are the same person, you tell me, what did $nit do? The extreme makeover was another thread, I imagine you were being your nasty old self and got slapped down for it. I didn't read it like you were banned, just your post was deleted, like when your Sageadvice self was edited.

I yam what I yam....Popeye


Submitted by baroombrawl on Thu, 03/05/2009 - 9:52am.

But for what?
I have read everything and don't remember seeing anything out of line for him!

Are certain subjects censored maybe? The Bush people tried that and got thumped and failed badly.

Is this paper on the verge, maybe?

The Wedge's picture
Submitted by The Wedge on Fri, 03/06/2009 - 12:48pm.

You see...this is where you constantly tip your hand. You have so many different accounts that you forget which alterego is in the thread. You just responded as Bonkers under the handle of baroombrawl. At times, you respond to Nitpickers under the Bonkers designate and aother times a dollaraday gets thrown in there. May I suggest to you that you only post under one handle per day? That way it stays straight in your mind.


meanoldconservatives's picture
Submitted by meanoldconservatives on Wed, 03/04/2009 - 10:18pm.

Banning one of $nit's alter egos is like taking a baby away from OctoMom.....


Submitted by MYTMITE on Thu, 03/05/2009 - 11:19pm.

I just love it when one of $nit's alter egos posts and another one replies and asks questions and/or agrees. Wouldn't you really like to get into that mind for about an hour and see just what is going on there?

meanoldconservatives's picture
Submitted by meanoldconservatives on Fri, 03/06/2009 - 9:26am.

I'll admit I had a chuckle myself!!!

I would take that trip for just one hour.....only with the guarantee I could return to earth.


Submitted by Bonkers on Fri, 03/06/2009 - 6:42am.

I simply do not understand all this stuff about "alter egos" and someone answering themself! I suppose they could if they wanted to do so!
I don't mind reading everyone's comments on here, except when someone starts questioning someone's right to be here!

Maybe more censoring is needed and only leave those on here who say what is expected?
Times are tough and going to get tougher. We may not be here much longer.

Submitted by MYTMITE on Fri, 03/06/2009 - 4:53pm.

Bonkers as Bonk. I don't think anyone is questioning anyone's right to be here. You say "We may not be here much longer." Does that mean that they are going to do an "Eve" on you--as in "Three Faces of Eve"? I hope not--all of you provide such fun for all the rest of us. What makes it even funnier is that you continue to act as if you have no connection with the others. Can it be that you are not in the loop so to speak? Are you the only one who is not in on the joke? Please don't go anywhere--life would be so dull on this site without all of you. To paraphrase "Never before have so many said so much with so little." 'ave a good day, matey.

Submitted by baroombrawl on Fri, 03/06/2009 - 5:37pm.

I saw my name in the subject but I have NO idea what you are talking about, and I doubt you do. Is bonkers the same as bonk?

I am not going anywhere and I think maybe the reference is to the death of newspapers, not someone.

Newspapers, due to technology, are going the way of the idiots who ruined us financially for the last eight years---out for good. Maybe Jindal and Newt and Armey can save you.

hutch866's picture
Submitted by hutch866 on Fri, 03/06/2009 - 7:48am.

So you say you and $nit aren't the same person?

I yam what I yam....Popeye


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.